This article examines how working-class bodies perform physically, affectively, and discursively in academic spaces. Through its conversation between a tenured professor and graduate student, the article employs performance theory to highlight how disruptive working-class teacher-bodies can be and the potential they offer for understanding the ideological work of academic social space.

In research-intensive universities, a complex web of inter-relations between mandates for research productivity and for general education teaching perpetuates the division into a two-tiered faculty described in the ADE survey of staffing patterns in departments of English. Other published and planned MLA and ADE reports—specifically, on the evaluation of scholarship for tenure and promotion, and on the master's degree—further illuminate the inter-relations between graduate education and general education staffing practices. MLA (in its “Academic Workforce Advocacy Kit”) and the Coalition for the Academic Workforce (in its issue brief entitled “On Faculty Serving All Students”) provide leadership for productive workforce changes.

This article argues that English faculty do not avail themselves sufficiently of research on cognition and learning in their classrooms or in their training of graduate students. The tenets of brain-based learning would enhance our ability to teach practical skills and to hone aesthetic appreciation, but most faculty and graduate students are not familiar with this research and do not incorporate it into their pedagogy.

In this article, an English education professor, a university writing center administrator, and a recent graduate of an undergraduate English education program discuss the role peer tutoring might play in enhancing the education of preservice teachers of writing. The authors argue that by providing additional, authentic field experiences which reflect constructivist, student-centered philosophies often adhered to in English education programs, university peer tutoring can provide undergraduate students with authentic experience in learning collaboratively, developing rapport with students, and conducting student-centered, one-to-one writing conferences.

In this issue, you will have the opportunity to read an unusual piece in our Reviews section.Written by the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Pedagogy Collective, it is a coauthored, multivoiced text that rehearses descriptions of a set of key terms taken from the authors' reading of professional writings on teaching. 1The collective was formed during a required course for graduate students seeking to teach a literature course in the English department.As they describe it, "The major goal for this course was to introduce students to the critical debates in literature pedagogy."As such, students were asked to synthesize their learning through writing a critical book review and a teaching philosophy with an annotated bibliography.Using excerpts from the students' teaching philosophies, the review essay in this issue was organized to expose and elaborate those "critical debates in literature pedagogy."Reading this essay from the UIUC Pedagogy Collective reminds us of how difficult it is to construct a philosophy of teaching.While on the job market, most of us have to write something like a teaching philosophy or create an introduction to a teaching portfolio.At the very least, we are asked in interviews such questions as, "Explain your approach to teaching the introductory survey."How do we construct such overarching philosophy statements without sounding naive, overly idealistic, or abstract?If we embrace an antifoundationalist pedagogical stance (and even if we don't), how do we employ the stance we take?When we turn to theorists (say, to Paolo Freire or Gerald Graff, two whom the collective mentions), do we really believe (that is, enact) the principles they espouse?

This collaboratively written essay offers an account of a group of graduate students preparing to teach a literature course at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. The students, guided by their professor, Dale Bauer, immerse themselves in current debates about teaching by reading Patrick Allitt's I'm the Teacher, You're the Student, Shari Stenberg's Professing and Pedagogy, Paul Kameen's Writing/Teaching, Gerald Graff's Clueless in Academe, and one textbook, Mariolina Salvatori and Pat Donahue's The Elements (and Pleasures) of Difficulty. The essay references a range of additional writing on the college and university classroom—including works by bell hooks, Ira Shor, Jane Tompkins, and Elaine Showalter. The essay includes excerpts from teaching statements the students composed as they worked through the current debates in literature pedagogy.

Research Article| October 01 2003 Graduate Education As Education: The Pedagogical Arts of Institutional Critique Virginia Crisco; Virginia Crisco Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Chris W. Gallagher; Chris W. Gallagher Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Deborah Minter; Deborah Minter Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Katie Hupp Stahlnecker; Katie Hupp Stahlnecker Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google John Talbird John Talbird Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Pedagogy (2003) 3 (3): 359–376. https://doi.org/10.1215/15314200-3-3-359 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Virginia Crisco, Chris W. Gallagher, Deborah Minter, Katie Hupp Stahlnecker, John Talbird; Graduate Education As Education: The Pedagogical Arts of Institutional Critique. Pedagogy 1 October 2003; 3 (3): 359–376. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/15314200-3-3-359 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search Books & JournalsAll JournalsPedagogy Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. © 2003 Duke University Press2003 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Pedagogy - Volume 1, Issue 3, Fall 2001

Research Article| October 01 2001 Preparing Graduate Students to Teach Literature: Composition Studies as a Possible Foundation John Schilb John Schilb Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Pedagogy (2001) 1 (3): 507–526. https://doi.org/10.1215/15314200-1-3-507 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Citation John Schilb; Preparing Graduate Students to Teach Literature: Composition Studies as a Possible Foundation. Pedagogy 1 October 2001; 1 (3): 507–526. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/15314200-1-3-507 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search Books & JournalsAll JournalsPedagogy Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. © 2001 Duke University Press2001 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal Issue Section: Articles You do not currently have access to this content.

Pedagogy - Volume 1, Issue 1, Winter 2001