Abstract
Despite a wealth of research on feedback practices in synchronous and asynchronous courses, little has been done to investigate such practices in hybrid writing pedagogy. How do instructors make choices about providing feedback when both instructional modes are operating in a course? A qualitative study conducted with fourteen instructors who teach hybrid writing courses at a large state university reveals how they navigate a series of choices about providing feedback on student writing. This study shows that instructional modality, use of the LMS, and labor conditions influence the decisions instructors make about how and when to provide feedback, especially on low-stakes work. While there is an emerging sense of thoughtful and critical decision-making around types of feedback and modality, this study finds that instructors do not yet have an integrated strategy when using the LMS to provide feedback in hybrid courses.
- Journal
- Journal of Response to Writing
- Published
- 2022-12-01
- CompPile
- Open Access
- OA PDF Gold
- Topics
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation Context
Citation data not yet available for this article.
Citation data is not available for Journal of Response to Writing. This journal's publisher does not deposit reference lists with CrossRef.
Related Articles
-
College Composition and Communication Jun 2025Kory Lawson Ching; Sabina Simon
-
Computers and Composition Mar 2025High-context instruction: A case study of community college student responses for academic success in online composition courses ↗Roberto Rojas-Alfaro; Jeshua Enriquez
-
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Jun 2024Lynn B. McCool
-
Journal of Business and Technical Communication Jan 2024Digital Video as a Discussion Board: A Case Study and Collaborative Autoethnography of Experiences ↗Tiffany Avery; Jessica Cody; Katherine Griffiths; Kristina Khodai; Ashley Lenahan; Maria Meluso; Yudai Sanada; Kayla Seabaugh; Rhonda Stanton; Emily Woodall
-
Pedagogy Apr 2023Jennifer Horwitz