Research Article| February 01 1997 Victor Hugo et l'art de convaincre Le récit hugolien: rhétorique, argumentation, persuasion. Albert W. Halsall, Victor Hugo et l'art de convaincre Le récit hugolien: rhétorique, argumentation, persuasion (Monfréal: Éditions Balzac, 1995), 496 pp. Áron Kibédi Varga Áron Kibédi Varga Minervalaan 793, NL-1077 NT Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Rhetorica (1997) 15 (1): 117–119. https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1997.15.1.117 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Áron Kibédi Varga; Victor Hugo et l'art de convaincre Le récit hugolien: rhétorique, argumentation, persuasion.. Rhetorica 1 February 1997; 15 (1): 117–119. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1997.15.1.117 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentRhetorica Search This content is only available via PDF. Copyright 1997, The International Society for the History of Rhetoric1997 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

This paper analyzes the rhetoric of the eighteenth- century English debate over occasional conformity in order to develop a better understanding of how persuasive appeals to moderation were used in this particular case. This debate is noteworthy because it reveals how the eighteenth-century veneration of moderation was influenced by the seventeenth-century Protestant reading of the New Testament. This understanding of moderation led to some of the first arguments suggesting a need for separation of church and state. Further, this example extends our theoretical understanding of moderate rhetoric when we observe its use as a justification for social change.

Reviews William M. Purcell, Ars Poetriae: Rhetorical and Grammatical Invention at the Margins of Literacy, Studies in Rhetoric/ Communication (Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1996), 193 pp. In the context of the evolution from oral to written discourse in the classical and medieval periods of western Europe, Purcell discusses six texts on the art of versification, or artes poetriae: 1) Matthew of Vendome, Ars versificatoria; 2) Geoffrey of Vinsauf, Poetria nova and Documentum de modo et arte dictandi et versificandi; 3) John of Garland, De arte prosayca, metrica , et rithmica (Parisiana poetria); 4) Gervasius of Melkley, Ars poetica; and 5) Eberhard the German, Laborintus. Composed in the twelfth and thir­ teenth centuries, these texts are revolutionary in their adaptation of rhetoric and grammar to poetry, which in that period was usually read aloud or recited. The book offers a useful introduction to material which may be difficult for most undergraduate students to obtain or to under­ stand; however, the critical framework into which Purcell places these texts needs justification, as it is part of a growing debate on the history of orality and literacy. The book is divided into two parts. Part I, consisting of two chapters, establishes the two main assumptions of the theoretical framework into which Purcell has placed the six treatises on poetic composition. The first assumption sets up a diachronic dichotomy between orality and literacy, from the Greek tradition to the invention of the printing press. Purcell argues that rhetoric in classical Greece and Rome was a discipline designed for oral delivery. Grammar was a written activity, developed for analysis and correction of text. As the societies of the Middle Ages pro­ gressed in literacy, grammar was increasingly applied to written material. Thus, Purcell sets up an oral-literate time spectrum. He treats the ancient Greek and late medieval periods as two poles, the former primarily oral and the latter increasingly text-based or literate. Citing Paul Prill, Purcell asserts that the arts of poetry of the twelfth and thirteenth centuries stand at the cusp of the shift from orality to literacy. The second major assumption of Purcell's theoretical framework is that grammar and rhetoric exchanged functions along the oral-literate time spectrum. In the classical period, rhetorical theory was used as a system of composition for oral delivery, while grammar was a system to correct and to analyze written text. By the time the arts of poetry were composed, these roles had begun to be reversed: "Ultimately, with the advent of the printing press, the text became the thing in and of itself, moving away 107 108 RHETORICA from the oral end of the spectrum and toward the literate end. At the same time, rhetoric—a more orally focused technology—moved toward the literate, and grammar—a more literally focused technology—moved toward the oral. The tension created by the rhetorical/grammatical move­ ment is reflected in the theoretical treatises in the artes poetriae themselves" (p. 5). Part II consists of five chapters, arranged chronologically, on the artes poetriae which illustrate the developments in the matrix of orality, literacy, grammar, and rhetoric which Purcell has set up in the first section of his book. Purcell provides excellent summaries of these treatises by giving an overview of their sections on invention, arrangement, and style. Less attention is given to invention and arrangement, as the author's primary interest is the overlapping of grammar and rhetoric in the domain of style, a unique contribution of poetic theory in the Middle Ages. Purcell's study of figures in the artes poetriae shows how the medieval tradition leads to the systematic relation of style to stasis theory in Renaissance rhetoric. This is the most valuable contribution of the book. Purcell argues that these treatises are not simply extensions or adapta­ tions of classical rhetoric, but that they establish a unique genre of rhetori­ cal theory at a time when orality and literacy coexisted. To demonstrate this point, he observes that the existing editions of the texts can be mis­ leading in causing readers to assume a debt to the classical sources. For example, the Faral edition and the Nims translation of Geoffrey of Vinsauf's Poetria Nova...

114 RHETORICA than once, insists he is telling the truth: "If I speak untruthfully . . . , O God, let me never come into thy kingdom" (p. 27). In an impressive compression of facts into nine pages of the publish­ ing history of the printed versions and six pages of detailed endnotes, Parker and Johnson give us a wealth of data, and one goes away feeling that indeed one has gotten closer to the speech event than anyone has pre­ viously been privileged to get. The authors conclude, "... it becomes clear that although frequently published, Raleigh's speech has been presented from relatively few of the potentially available texts: three from identifi­ able manuscripts, and four basic printed sources, with various conflations of these texts. The Dutch edition takes its place, therefore, as the earliest of the published texts, the closest to the event it describes" (p. 69). A limited edition of six hundred copies of this volume was printed. Those fortunate enough to secure a copy will possess a classic volume of rigorous scholarship, a model for those drawn to the history of rhetoric. J. Vernon Jensen Lana Cable, Carnal Rhetoric: Milton's Iconoclasm and the Poetics of Desire (Durham and London: Duke University Press, 1995), x + 231 pp. This is an interesting but irritating book. Lana Cable's survey of Milton's affective rhetoric ambitiously extends Paul Ricoeur's doctrine of metaphor, which (more emphatically than the other theory assimilated by Cable) already constitutes a serious implicit challenge to older thinking. For Quintilian, emotion is mainly derived from enargeia and visio, and for the Roman rhetoricians (as Beth Innocenti recently reminded us), such visio was best expressed in graphic, sensory, non-figurative language. For Ricoeur, thinking and poetic feeling (the most positive and transformative mode of emotion) are integral. They work through metaphor, and, in the Aristotelian terms which Ricoeur adopts, the differences between the metaphorical idea (or image) and its referent are as important as the similarities. Overcoming every pre-existent sense of difference, metaphor at its most novel "does not merely actualize a potential connotation, it creates it. It is a semantic innova­ tion, an emergent meaning."1 Since feeling is an integral part of this process, rhetoric will project its most intense pathos when it orients this innovation towards things of the greatest import, as it does in Milton. Ricoeur protests at a tendency, derived from Hume, to think of :Mario J. Valdes, ed., A Ricoeur Reader: Reflection and Imagination (London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991), p. 79. Reviews 115 imagery as decaying sense impression, basically passive; he favours the active Kantian view of "imagination as the place of nascent meanings and categories."2 Applied to the rhetorical arousal of emotion, this means the subsuming of pathos into ethos: sensory images, whether of the past, the present, or the future, of the actual or the potential, are presented through the "likeness" of metaphor. This brings new connotations to bear for both "tenor" and "vehicle" (terms which Ricoeur adopts from Richards), and presses these on the reader or listener through the emotional, logical, and linguistic shock of a comparison that transcends the "first-order feelings" or "bodily emotions"3 derived from sense—or from the direct verbal evo­ cation of sensory experience? Repeated shocks must draw attention from the subjects of debate (however emotive) to the condition of the debaters, and to the inspiriting relationship of persuader and persuadee. Cable's point of departure is to question or qualify Ricoeur's idea that the "second-order feelings" attendant on metaphor transcend (or suspend) the emotional impact of sense. In her view, "A more psychologically cred­ ible account of metaphor's dependence on imagination and feeling would have to recognize that these two are functioning in tandem all the time, whether occasioned by literary experience or by some other kind of experi­ ence . . . drawing ... on sense perceptions both immediate and remem­ bered; on understanding and knowledge; on beliefs, aspirations, opinions, and prejudices . . ." (p. 29). This existing complex of influences must (though Cable never adequately explains the point) constitute the mental and emotional images, the "complacency" (p. 32) which iconoclastic metaphor breaks or refashions. In fusing it with poetry and semantics, Cable is...

Reviews 117 material. Concentrating on the prose and Samson Agonistes, she does best with Areopagitica, Iconoclastes, and Samson itself. Even here, her analysis some­ times lacks rhetorical or lexical precision. An acute analysis of Milton's appalled history of censorship, which recounts how a Pope "excommunicat­ ed the reading of heretical books" (p. 126), would be even richer if she had noticed other aspects of the metonymy which she apparently does not recog­ nise (though semantic innovation might well work in a quite distinctive way through this trope). She misreads "the single whiff of a negative" character­ ising royal arrogance (p. 156) as a bad smell, rather than a puff of wind. But it is invigorating to see the iconoclastic reading extended to positive images like Areopagitica's metaphor of books as men, and she gives a fine account of Milton's demolition job, not only on the false image of Charles I but also on his false religion and his idolised prayers. Her theory works well here, to illuminate the rhetoric of Milton's own rhetorical analysis. Finally, her discussion of Samson forms a challenging summation of the whole approach. Dalila and Harapha are read as metaphors for two related states of mind which Samson must transcend, his "icons of shame and glory." This is persuasive, like the broad idea that Samson "becomes a metaphor for the paradox of bearing witness that is true to transformative desire, true to an impetus toward that which cannot itself be known" (p. 176). But the sharpness of Samson's agon, the complexity of his feelings and the labyrinth of his moral reasoning, remain underplayed. Far more than the other displeasing features of the book, such as its overblown word-processor prose, this failure to integrate a very valuable line of inves­ tigation with a broader and more balanced concept of rhetoric, stands out. Robert Cockcroft Albert W. Halsall, Victor Hugo et l'art de convaincre - Le récit hugolien: rhétorique, argumentation, persuasion (Montréal: Éditions Balzac, 1995), 496 pp. "L'art de convaincre" - c'est sous ce titre qu'Albert Halsall avait déjà publié en 1988 une très intéressante étude consacrée à la rhétorique du récit (aux Éditions Paratexte, à Toronto). Il y insistait sur la nécessité de soumettre les genres narratifs - qui sont devenus depuis deux cents ans les genres littéraires par excellence -, au delà des analyses narratologiques courantes, à un examen rhétorique, afin de mettre en relief leur caractère idéologique, confirmant ou attaquant la doxa (d'une nation, d une péri­ ode). C'est ainsi que l'analyse rhétorique apportera une contribution 118 RHETORICA importante à ¡'histoire des idées. Le présent livre fait suite au premier; il en est une application pra­ tique, non pas à un type particulier de récit mais à l'ensemble de l'œuvre narrative d'un seul auteur. Le choix de Victor Hugo ne paraît surprenant qu'à première vue: nous savons, certes, que dans un vers célèbre et sou­ vent cité des Contemplations le grand poète romantique avait déclaré "la guerre à la rhétorique", mais existe-t-il en fait une écriture qui en soit entièrement dénuée? Halsall montre fort bien que la doctrine romantique de l'originalité peut être considérée comme une stratégie rhétorique et que, en réalité, Hugo entend substituer une nouvelle rhétorique à la vieille: à la mesure classique, il opposera la démesure, aux figures d'atténuation (comme la litote) les procédés hyperboliques d'exténuation (p. 24). Ses fi­ gures préférées seront l'hyperbole et l'antithèse. Loin de rejeter l'art ora­ toire, il en intervertit systématiquement les termes: selon un texte de Hugo datant de 1834, le grand orateur c'est Mirabeau, précisément parce qu'il est "reprochable de toutes parts", parce qu'il possède toutes les pro­ priétés qu'un orateur ne devrait pas posséder: il est laid, il a l'organe dur, il est haï de toute l'assemblée, etc. (p. 30). Dans l'immense bibliographie de...

Abstract: The teaching and practice of rhetoric at Trinity College, Dublin, in the eighteenth century have been little discussed in the literature. This article describes the curriculum and pedagogy related to the old and “new rhetoric” of the Scottish enlightenment as disclosed by documents in the archives of Trinity College Library; the published lectures of two Erasmus Smith Professors of Oratory and History, John Lawson and Thomas Leland; and the lectures of Thomas Sheridan on elocution. Minutes of the student historical clubs in which debates and harangues are preserved illustrate the interests of the students, their techniques of debate, and the demonstrative exhortations of their officers. The student orations chronicle the gradual absorption of the principles of the new rhetoric at the College.

Abstract: This essay explores how classical legal or forensic rhetoric informs Henry Fielding's work as a novelist. Focusing on the dichotomous or contradictory application and characterization of forensic rhetoric in Fielding's three major novels—joseph Andrews, Tom jones, and Amelia—I will suggest that the exuberance and confidence that tjrpify the novelist's portrayal of legal rhetoric within the diegetic realm of his narrators is undermined or rendered problematic by the wariness and pessimism with which the same kind of discourse is presented within the mimetie worlds of the stories themselves. After speculating about the biographical, historical, and aesthetic ramifications of this dichotomy, the essay concludes with brief discussion of the ideological significance of Fielding's portrayal of the lawyerly art of persuasion.

Abstract: Ideology can be considered the ethos of the modern, liberal, democratic, capitalist nation state. Working from the descriptions of political ethos in Aristotle's Rhetoric, Tapies, and Politics, the differences from and similarities to post-Renaissance political structures underline the modern insistence on ways to stabilise the representation of the group in power, giving it its veil of authority, as well as ways to stabilise the description or definition of the individual within the nation. Looking at a number of contemporary commentaries from both political theory and cultural studies, the essay elaborates the rhetoric necessary to constitute ideology as the ethos of the nation state, and goes on to detail some of the constraints on the individual who, in gaining access to power, becomes subject to that state. The rhetoric of ideology provides not only an ethos for the character of the group in power, but also a set of guidelines for establishing a spedfic responsive state in the audience, an ethics of pathos. Its ethos is a strategy that imposes a strategy. The circularity of this ethos marks many of the analyses undertaken by current theory, and it has only recently been challenged by, among others, feminist historians of rhetoric. The discussion moves to a point where it asks: given that multinational and transnational corporations now share with the nation state the regularisation of capitalist exploitation, is ideology effective as a political rhetoric any more? Who is the wife of the nation state? And, what is the ethos of the multinational?

Abstract: Jean-Jacques Rousseau, the enemy of books and civilized learning, might seem poles apart from Quintilian, who was so popular in France in the eighteenth century. Nevertheless, although there are only small traces of direct contact between the author of Émile and the Institutio, comparison between the two works is illuminating. Both are large-scale educational treatises embodying a vision of humanity. The important common ground between them concerns the importance of early childhood, a certain moral idealism, and the prfrence for a manly form of speech. Significant divergences begin to appear in relation to three major areas of concern: citizenship and the public life, the relation of words to things, and the question of acting, imagination, and fiction. Je ne me lasse point de le redire: mettez toutes les leçons des jeunes gens en actions plustôt qu'en discours; qu'ils n'apprennent rien dans les livres de ce que l'expérience peut leur enseigner. Quel extravagant projet de les exercer à parler sans sujet de rien dire, de croire leur faire sentir sur les bancs d'un collège l'énergie du langage des passions, et toute la force de l'art de persuader sans intérêt de rien persuader à personne! Tous les préceptes de la rhétorique ne semblent qu'un pur verbiage à quiconque n'en sent pas l'usage pour son profit. Qu'importe à un Ecolier comment s'y prit Annibal pour déterminer ses soldats à passer les Alpes? (I never tire of repeating it: put ail your tessons for young people into actions, not speeches; let them learn nothing from books which they could learn from experience. What an insane idea to exercise them in speaking when they have nothing to speak about, to believe one can make them feel on their school benches the language of the passions and ail the force of the art of persuasion, when they have no interest in persuading anybody! All the precepts of rhetoric are pure verbiage to anyone who cannot see what use they are to him. What does it matter to a schoolboy how Hannibal set about persuading his soldiers to cross the Alps?)

Abstract: Abstract: Nature is a highly tendentious Word and was already so in the time of Quintilian. Since the Stoic ideal was "to live according to Nature," the concept can be invoked persuasively in every phase of education. But Nature had other regular functions in rhetoric: to demarcate innate talent from acquired skill (Natura vs. Ars); to distinguish reality, the outside world, from verbal imitation; and to privilege preferred patterns of argumentation. These competing uses lead to inconsistencies, especially in presenting the relationship between Nature and imitation. The purpose of this paper is to detect these contradictions and illustrate the assumptions that underlie them in Quintilian's tieatment of invention, organization, and expression.

Abstract: Modern rhetorical theory suggests that the rhetorical concept of doxa entails social dimensions of rank and regard. A trustworthy ethos is one in which the rhetor identifies with orthodoxy by signalling allegiance to doxastic elements of narrarive knowledge, presuppositions and methodology, and hierarchy. In his Letter to the Grand Duchess Christina, Galileo fails to project an orthodox ethos in his attempt to rewrite narrative knowledge because, although he adheres to orthodox methodology and presuppositions, he disregards orthodox hierarchy and even tries to restructure it.

Abstract: Harriet Beecher Stowe, in Uncle Tom's Cabin, used two different and conflicting rhetorical stiategies in her novel's appeals to end slavery. To elicit sympathy for the slaves, she used persuasion, a process relying upon the perception of a sameness of substance among persons. To induce fear of damnation in Northerners who condoned or passively accepted Southern slavery, she used conversion rhetoric, a process relying upon the conviction that personal identity and value are derived entirely from the moral and social “system” that produces the individual. Because the novel projects Northern and Southern whites as belonging to the same system, and since its persuasive processes, by eliciting sympathy for slaves, bring them into the system, their suffering proves the system's corruption, whlie the Southerners' lack of sympathy proves their difference of substance—their lack of humanity. Since the logic of conversion requires condemning the corrupt self, the novel ultimately prepared Northern readers to condemn Southern whites, even though such condemnation went against Stowe's intentions.

Abstract: This essay analyses conversation at archaic and classical Greek banquets and symposia, using first epic, then elegiac and lyric poetry, and finally Old Comedy. Epic offers few topics, mostiy arising from the situation of a guest. Those of sympotic poetry, from which prose exchanges may cautiously be inferred, are more numerous:reflection, praise of the living and the dead, consolation of the bereaved, proclamations of likes and dislikes, declarations of love,narrative of one's own erotic experiences or (scandalously) of others',personal criticism and abuse, and the telling of fables. Many of these verbal interventions are competitive. Comedy reinforces the prevalence of an ethos of entertainment, corroborating the telling of fables and adding creditable anecdotes about one's career, singing skolia,and playing games of "comparisons" and riddles.

Abstract: Although “community” has become an important critical concept in contemporary rhetoric, it is only implicit in ancient rhetorics. In the rhetorical thought of the sophists, Plato, and Aristotle, the polis stands as a presupposition that was both fundamental and troublesome. Various relationships between the faculty of speech and the social order are revealed in different tellings of the history of civilization by Protagoras, Plato, and Aristotle, as well as in more formal discussions of rhetoric and politics. These ancient disagreements about the nature of community can help us reformulate the current debate between liberalism and communitarianism. A rhetorical community as a site of contention can be both pluralist and normative.

Research Article| May 01 1993 Protagoras and Logos: A Study in Greek Philosophy and Rhetoric Edward Schiappa, Protagoras and Logos: A Study in Greek Philosophy and Rhetoric, Studies in Rhetoric / Communication (Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, 1991), xvii + 239 pp. Richard Leo Enos Richard Leo Enos Department of English, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3890, USA Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Rhetorica (1993) 11 (2): 199–202. https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1993.11.2.199 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Richard Leo Enos; Protagoras and Logos: A Study in Greek Philosophy and Rhetoric. Rhetorica 1 May 1993; 11 (2): 199–202. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1993.11.2.199 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentRhetorica Search Copyright 1993, The International Society for the History of Rhetoric1993 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

he question of the existence of a Hebrew concept of per­ suasion arises as a subordinate pofrit in James BCinneavy's book, The Greek Rhetorical Origins of Christian Faith. Kmneavy's thesis is that the Christian notion of TTIO-TIC, faith as dis­ tinct from the Hebrew concept of faithfulness or trust, 'emunâ, owes its origin the Greek concept of TTIO-TIC, beUef as persuasion or proof. In the process of proving this thesis, Kinneavy cites G. Berfram's Hebrew supplement Rudolf Bultmann's essay on -rreidu} in the Theological Dictionary of the New Testament. Berfram comments that bibUcal Hebrew has no word corresponding TTeidu), to persuade (Bultmann 1). From this, and from the con­ cordance the Septuagint which indeed shows that no Hebrew verb was franslated with Greek ireido) in its active fransitive form, Kirmeavy draws the conclusion that this apparent lack is conceptual—that what is lacking is an awareness of a reflective and analytical concept of persuasion as such (54). In my opinion, this conclusion, whUe not in itself incorrect, is unwarranted by the evidence Kinneavy attests, which instead points a more specifie difference between disparate concepts of persuasion, whether pragmatic and impUdt, as in the Hebrew fradition, or reflective and analytical, as in the Greek.

Research Article| August 01 1992 Cicerone, De oratore: la doppia funzione dell'ethos dell'oratore Lucia Calboli Montefusco Lucia Calboli Montefusco Dipartimento di FiloIogia Classica e Medioevale, Universita Degli Studi di Bologna, via Zamboni, 32–34, 40126 Bologna. Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Rhetorica (1992) 10 (3): 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1992.10.3.245 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Lucia Calboli Montefusco; Cicerone, De oratore: la doppia funzione dell'ethos dell'oratore. Rhetorica 1 August 1992; 10 (3): 245–259. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1992.10.3.245 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentRhetorica Search This content is only available via PDF. Copyright 1992, The International Society for the History of Rhetoric1992 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Research Article| August 01 1992 Aristotle on Persuasion Through Character William W. Fortenbaugh William W. Fortenbaugh Dept. of Classics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903-0270. Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Rhetorica (1992) 10 (3): 207–244. https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1992.10.3.207 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation William W. Fortenbaugh; Aristotle on Persuasion Through Character. Rhetorica 1 August 1992; 10 (3): 207–244. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1992.10.3.207 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentRhetorica Search This content is only available via PDF. Copyright 1992, The International Society for the History of Rhetoric1992 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Research Article| August 01 1992 From Disputation to Argumentation: The French Morality Play in the Sixteenth Century Marijke Spies Marijke Spies Herenstratt 11 B, 1015 BX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Rhetorica (1992) 10 (3): 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1992.10.3.261 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Marijke Spies; From Disputation to Argumentation: The French Morality Play in the Sixteenth Century. Rhetorica 1 August 1992; 10 (3): 261–271. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1992.10.3.261 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentRhetorica Search This content is only available via PDF. Copyright 1992, The International Society for the History of Rhetoric1992 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Research Article| May 01 1991 Patterns of Persuasion in the Gospels Burton L. Mack and Vernon K. Robbins; Patterns of Persuasion in the Gospels. Sonoma, CA: Polebridge Press, 1989; 230 pp. James D. Hester James D. Hester Department of Religion, University of Redlands, Redlands, California 92373. Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Rhetorica (1991) 9 (2): 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1991.9.2.179 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation James D. Hester; Patterns of Persuasion in the Gospels. Rhetorica 1 May 1991; 9 (2): 179–185. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1991.9.2.179 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentRhetorica Search Copyright 1991, The International Society for the History of Rhetoric1991 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Research Article| November 01 1987 Narration and Argumentation: Quintilian on Narratio as the Heart of Rhetorical Thinking John O'Banion John O'Banion Humanities Division, Sauk Valley College, R.R. 5, Dixon, IL 61021 Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Rhetorica (1987) 5 (4): 325–351. https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1987.5.4.325 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation John O'Banion; Narration and Argumentation: Quintilian on Narratio as the Heart of Rhetorical Thinking. Rhetorica 1 November 1987; 5 (4): 325–351. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1987.5.4.325 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentRhetorica Search This content is only available via PDF. Copyright 1987, The International Society for the History of Rhetoric1987 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Research Article| May 01 1987 Rhetoric and Praxis: The Contribution of Classical Rhetoric to Practical Reasoning Rhetoric and Praxis: The Contribution of Classical Rhetoric to Practical Reasoning, edited by Jean Dietz Moss. Washington, D.C.: Catholic University Press of America, 1986. pp. xi + 172. Josina M. Makau Josina M. Makau Department of Communication, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210 Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Rhetorica (1987) 5 (2): 194–198. https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1987.5.2.194 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Josina M. Makau; Rhetoric and Praxis: The Contribution of Classical Rhetoric to Practical Reasoning. Rhetorica 1 May 1987; 5 (2): 194–198. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1987.5.2.194 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentRhetorica Search This content is only available via PDF. Copyright 1987, The International Society for the History of Rhetoric1987 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Research Article| November 01 1986 Amatory Persuasion in Antiquity: Studies in Theory and Practice Amatory Persuasion in Antiquity: Studies in Theory and Practiceby Nicolas Gross. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1985. pp. 192. Thomas Conley Thomas Conley Dept. of Speech Communication, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801 USA Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Rhetorica (1986) 4 (4): 424–425. https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1986.4.4.424 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Thomas Conley; Amatory Persuasion in Antiquity: Studies in Theory and Practice. Rhetorica 1 November 1986; 4 (4): 424–425. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1986.4.4.424 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentRhetorica Search This content is only available via PDF. Copyright 1986, The International Society for The History of Rhetoric1986 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Research Article| February 01 1986 Richard Whately's Public Persuasion: The Relationship between his Rhetorical Theory and his Rhetorical Practice Lois Einhorn Lois Einhorn Department of English, General Literature, and Rhetoric, State University of New York, Binghamton, N. Y. 13901, USA Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Rhetorica (1986) 4 (1): 50–65. https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1986.4.1.50 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Lois Einhorn; Richard Whately's Public Persuasion: The Relationship between his Rhetorical Theory and his Rhetorical Practice. Rhetorica 1 February 1986; 4 (1): 50–65. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1986.4.1.50 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentRhetorica Search This content is only available via PDF. Copyright 1986, The International Society for The History of Rhetoric1986 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Research Article| November 01 1985 Rhetorik—Topik—Argumentation. Bibliographie zur Redelehre und Rhetorikforschung im deutschsprachigen Raum 1945-1979/80 Rhetorik—Topik—Argumentation. Bibliographie zur Redelehre und Rhetorikforschung im deutschsprachigen Raum 1 945-1979/80Robert Jamison und Joachim Dyck (Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog, 1983, 349 pp. Ln.). Jørgen Fafner Jørgen Fafner Kobenhavns Universitet Institut for Retorik, Klerkegade 2, 1308 Copenhagen, Denmark. Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Rhetorica (1985) 3 (4): 295–297. https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1985.3.4.295 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Jørgen Fafner; Rhetorik—Topik—Argumentation. Bibliographie zur Redelehre und Rhetorikforschung im deutschsprachigen Raum 1945-1979/80. Rhetorica 1 November 1985; 3 (4): 295–297. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1985.3.4.295 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentRhetorica Search This content is only available via PDF. Copyright 1985, The International Society for the History of Rhetoric1985 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Research Article| May 01 1983 Aristotelian and Ramist Rhetoric in Thomas Hobbes's Leviathan: Pathos versus Ethos and Logos James P. Zappen James P. Zappen College of Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Rhetorica (1983) 1 (1): 65–91. https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1983.1.1.65 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation James P. Zappen; Aristotelian and Ramist Rhetoric in Thomas Hobbes's Leviathan: Pathos versus Ethos and Logos. Rhetorica 1 May 1983; 1 (1): 65–91. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1983.1.1.65 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentRhetorica Search This content is only available via PDF. Copyright 1983, The International Society for the History of Rhetoric1983 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.