Assessing Writing
1 article
Search
Year:
From…
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
1989
1988
1987
1986
1985
1984
1983
1982
1981
1980
1979
1978
1977
1976
1975
1974
1973
1972
1971
1970
1969
1968
1967
1966
1965
1964
1963
1962
1961
1960
1959
1958
1957
1956
1955
1954
1953
1952
1951
1950
1949
1948
1947
1946
1945
1944
1943
1942
1941
1940
1939
–
To…
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
1989
1988
1987
1986
1985
1984
1983
1982
1981
1980
1979
1978
1977
1976
1975
1974
1973
1972
1971
1970
1969
1968
1967
1966
1965
1964
1963
1962
1961
1960
1959
1958
1957
1956
1955
1954
1953
1952
1951
1950
1949
1948
1947
1946
1945
1944
1943
1942
1941
1940
1939
Topic:
All topics…
assessment (279)
multilingual writers (149)
editorial matter (115)
writing pedagogy (61)
teacher development (57)
book reviews (54)
literacy studies (43)
revision (33)
argument (31)
artificial intelligence (31)
grammar and mechanics (30)
genre theory (29)
digital rhetoric (20)
portfolios (18)
qualitative research (18)
empirical research (15)
affect and writing (14)
race and writing (14)
discourse analysis (9)
graduate education (9)
gender and writing (7)
rhetorical criticism (7)
collaborative writing (6)
multimodality (6)
online writing instruction (5)
first-year composition (4)
technical communication (3)
modern rhetorical theory (2)
peer tutoring (2)
translingualism (2)
writing across the curriculum (2)
basic writing (1)
creative writing (1)
professional writing (1)
quantitative research (1)
scientific writing (1)
voice and style (1)
writing program administration (1)
Apply
Clear
Export:
BibTeX
RIS
quantitative research
×
July 2017
Jul 2017
Assessing peer and instructor response to writing: A corpus analysis from an expert survey
↗
Ian G. Anson; Chris M. Anson
revision
quantitative research
editorial matter
doi:10.1016/j.asw.2017.03.001