Assessing Writing Jul 2017

Assessing peer and instructor response to writing: A corpus analysis from an expert survey

Ian G. Anson ; Chris M. Anson
Journal
Assessing Writing
Published
2017-07-01
DOI
10.1016/j.asw.2017.03.001
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Topics
quantitative research revision

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

  1. Finkenstaedt-Quinn et al. (2024)
    Reading, receiving, revising: A case study on the relationship between peer rev…
    Assessing Writing
  2. Hammond (2019)
    Making our invisible racial agendas visible: Race talk in Assessing Writing, 19…
    Assessing Writing
  3. Zheng et al. (2019)
    What has been assessed in writing and how? Empirical evidence from Assessing Wr…
    Assessing Writing
  4. Johnson et al. (2017)
    College student perceptions of writing errors, text quality, and author charact…
    Assessing Writing

Cites in this index (13)

  1. Leijen (2017)
    A Novel Approach to Examine the Impact of Web-based Peer Review on the Revision…
    Computers and Composition
  2. Anson et al. (2016)
    Students’ Perceptions of Oral Screencast Responses to Their Writing
    Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Anderson et al. (2015)
    The Contributions of Writing to Learning and Development: Results from a Large-…
    Research in the Teaching of English
  4. Dixon et al. (2013)
    Everything is illuminated: What big data can tell us about teacher commentary
    Assessing Writing
  5. Vincelette et al. (2013)
    Show and tell: Student and instructor perceptions of screencast assessment
    Assessing Writing
Show all 13 →
  1. Hayes (2012)
    Modeling and Remodeling Writing
    Written Communication
  2. Lunsford et al. (2008)
    “Mistakes Are a Fact of Life”: A National Comparative Study
    College Composition and Communication
  3. Cho et al. (2006)
    Commenting on Writing
    Written Communication
  4. Stern et al. (2006)
    Effective faculty feedback: The road less traveled
    Assessing Writing
  5. Haswell (2005)
    NCTE/CCCC’s Recent War on Scholarship
    Written Communication
  6. Straub (1997)
    Students’ Reactions to Teacher Comments: An Exploratory Study
    Research in the Teaching of English
  7. Harris (1992)
    Collaboration Is Not Collaboration Is Not Collaboration: Writing Center Tutoria…
    College Composition and Communication
  8. Bruffee (1984)
    Collaborative Learning and the "Conversation of Mankind"
    College English
Also cites 22 works outside this index ↓
  1. Bailey (2010)
    Is the feedback in higher education assessment worth the paper it is written on? Teachers…
    Teaching in Higher Education  ↗
  2. Berg (1999)
    The effects of trained peer response on ESL students’ revision types and writing quality
    Journal of Second Language Writing  ↗
  3. Comer (2014)
    Writing to learn and learning to write across the disciplines: Peer-to-peer writing in in…
    The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning  ↗
  4. Connors (1988)
    Frequency of formal errors in current college writing, or Ma and Pa Kettle do research
    College Composition and Communication  ↗
  5. DiPardo (1988)
    Peer response groups in the writing classroom: Theoretic foundations and new directions
    Review of Educational Research  ↗
  6. Duncan (2007)
    “Feed-forward”: Improving students’ use of tutors’ comments
    Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education  ↗
  7. Ferris (2013)
    Written corrective feedback for individual L2 writers
    Journal of Second Language Writing  ↗
  8. Flower (1981)
    A cognitive process theory of writing
    College Composition and Communication  ↗
  9. Flower (1986)
    Detection, diagnosis, and the strategies of revision
    College Composition and Communication  ↗
  10. Goldin (2012)
    Redesigning educational peer review interactions using computer tools: An introduction
    Journal of Writing Research  ↗
  11. Hansen (2005)
    Guiding principles for effective peer response
    ELT Journal  ↗
  12. Jones (2012)
    Student feedback via screen capture digital video: Stimulating student's modified action
    Higher Education  ↗
  13. Keh (1990)
    Feedback in the writing process: A model and methods for implementation
    ELT Journal  ↗
  14. Kim (2009)
    Student–faculty interaction in research universities: Differences by student gender, race…
    Research in Higher Education  ↗
  15. Leijen (2012)
    Linguistic and review features of peer feedback and their effect on the implementation of…
    Journal of Writing Research  ↗
  16. Lundberg (2004)
    Quality and frequency of faculty-student interaction as predictors of learning: An analys…
    Journal of College Student Development  ↗
  17. Lundstrom (2009)
    To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer's own writing
    Journal of Second Language Writing  ↗
  18. Lunsford (1997)
    When less is more: Principles for responding in the disciplines
    New Directions for Teaching and Learning  ↗
  19. Montgomery (2007)
    Teacher-written feedback: Student perceptions, teacher self-assessment, and actual teache…
    Journal of Second Language Writing  ↗
  20. Nelson (2009)
    The nature of feedback: How different types of peer feedback affect writing performance
    Instructional Science  ↗
  21. Nicol (2006)
    Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good fe…
    Studies in Higher Education  ↗
  22. Paulus (1999)
    The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing
    Journal of Second Language Writing  ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 20 View in citation network →

Related Articles

  1. Written Communication Jan 2025
    Self-Regulated Strategy Development With and Without Peer Interaction: Improving High School Students’ L2 Persuasive Essay Revisions ↗
    Albert W. Li
    quantitative research multimodality revision
  2. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Oct 2024
    “Possibly Include Maybe a Fact. . .Perhaps”: Language in Business Communication Students’ Peer Feedback ↗
    Nicole A. Ploeger-Lyons; Jane Strong
    graduate education quantitative research revision
  3. Written Communication Apr 1994
    Revising Psychiatry's Charter Document ↗
    LUCILLE PARKINSON McCARTHY; JOAN PAGE GERRING
    quantitative research multimodality race and writing revision
  4. Assessing Writing Apr 2026
    An ecological approach to L2 learners’ engagement with written feedback ↗
    Zaibo Long; Jinfen Xu
    revision
  5. Assessing Writing Apr 2026
    L2 learners’ engagement with AI-generated feedback on writing ↗
    Xinyu Ma; Cong Zhang; Icy Lee
    revision