Computers and Composition Jun 2023 Open Access

Exploring how response technologies shape instructor feedback: A comparison of Canvas Speedgrader, Google Docs, and Turnitin GradeMark

Angela Laflen California State University, Sacramento

Abstract

There have been few studies examining the variation that exists within modes of feedback: for example, comparing how electronic text feedback created using Google Docs differs from electronic text feedback created using Microsoft Word or how audiovisual feedback created using TechSmith Capture differs from audiovisual feedback created using Screencast-O-Matic. However, the programs that instructors use to create feedback have different affordances, meaning that even within a single mode, the feedback students receive on their writing can vary significantly. To better understand the variation that exists within a single mode, this study investigates how affordances of Canvas Speedgrader, Google Docs, and Turnitin GradeMark impacted electronic text feedback.Based on analysis of 131 feedback files created using the 3 programs, in conjunction with 5 student surveys, and 2 instructor interviews, the study provides insights into how instructor written commentary (location, form, type, focus, and mitigation) varied by program and how participants perceived of feedback provided through the 3 programs. The study...s primary finding is that the affordances of the programs used to create electronic text feedbackresulted in significant differences ininstructorcommentary and instructor and student perceptions of feedback.

Journal
Computers and Composition
Published
2023-06-01
DOI
10.1016/j.compcom.2023.102777
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
online writing instruction

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Townsend et al. (2026)
    Student perceptions of screen recording and screencast assignments in first-yea…
    Computers and Composition

Cites in this index (5)

  1. Neumann et al. (2019)
    Using Google Docs for Peer-then-Teacher Review on Middle School Students’ Writing
    Computers and Composition
  2. Cunningham (2019)
    Student Perceptions and Use of Technology-Mediated Text and Screencast Feedback…
    Computers and Composition
  3. Cope et al. (2011)
    Technology-Mediated Writing Assessments: Principles and Processes
    Computers and Composition
  4. DePew et al. (2009)
    Mediating Power: Distance Learning Interfaces, Classroom Epistemology, and the Gaze
    Computers and Composition
  5. Sommers (1982)
    Responding to Student Writing
    College Composition and Communication
Also cites 15 works outside this index ↓
  1. Alharbi (2019)
    The role of an instructor's asynchronous feedback in promoting students’ interaction and …
    International Journal of English Linguistics  ↗
  2. Al Qunayeer (2020)
    Identifying the linguistic features and content of teacher electronic feedback and studen…
    International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature  ↗
  3. Anson (2017)
    Assessing peer and instructor response to writing: A corpus analysis from an expert survey
    Assessing Writing  ↗
  4. Ene (2014)
    Learner uptake of teacher electronic feedback in ESL composition
    System  ↗
  5. Ene (2018)
    Synchronous and asynchronous teacher electronic feedback and learner uptake in ESL composition
    Journal of Second Language Writing  ↗
  6. Ferris (1997)
    The influence of teacher commentary on student revision
    TESOL Quarterly  ↗
  7. Ferris (1997)
    Teacher commentary on student writing: Descriptions & implications
    Journal of Second Language Writing  ↗
  8. Han (2015)
    Exploring learner engagement with written corrective feedback in a Chinese tertiary EFL c…
    Journal of Second Language Writing  ↗
  9. Ice (2010)
    An analysis of students’ perceptions of the value and efficacy of instructors’ auditory a…
    Journal of Educational Computing Research  ↗
  10. Laflen (2017)
    Responding to student writing online: Tracking student interactions with instructor feedb…
    Assessing Writing  ↗
  11. Nurmukhamedov (2009)
    Teacher feedback on writing: Considering the options
    Writing & Pedagogy  ↗
  12. Orlando (2016)
    A comparison of text, voice, and screencasting feedback to online students
    American Journal of Distance Education  ↗
  13. Ware (2014)
    Feedback for adolescent writers in the English classroom: Exploring pen-and-paper, electr…
    Writing & Pedagogy  ↗
  14. Zhang (2018)
    Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing
    Assessing Writing  ↗
  15. Zheng (2018)
    Student engagement with teacher written corrective feedback in EFL writing: A case study …
    Assessing Writing  ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 3 View in citation network →

Related Articles

  1. Computers and Composition Dec 2025
    Supporting online learning for diverse elementary students: A community of inquiry approach to collaborative multimodal composing—processes, products, and perspectives ↗
    Amanda Yoshiko Shimizu; Jill Santos
    multimodality online writing instruction
  2. Composition Forum Oct 2025
    Lab Notes as Disciplinary Literacy: Developing an Integrated, Genre-Based Writing Curriculum in a First-Year Engineering Physics Program ↗
    graduate education genre theory online writing instruction multilingual writers
  3. Written Communication Jul 2025
    Does ChatGPT Write Like a Student? Engagement Markers in Argumentative Essays ↗
    Feng (Kevin) Jiang; Ken Hyland
    writing pedagogy quantitative research multimodality online writing instruction artificial intelligence
  4. College Composition and Communication Jun 2025
    Beyond the Best of Both Worlds: Student Perceptions of Hybrid Writing Courses ↗
    Kory Lawson Ching; Sabina Simon
    multimodality online writing instruction
  5. Computers and Composition Mar 2025
    Preparing for a new paradigm: A mixed-methods study of student experience in on-site, hybrid, and online writing courses ↗
    Daniel Libertz; Kamal Belmihoub; Constantin Schreiber; Lisa Blankenship
    online writing instruction