Computers and Composition Mar 2026 Open Access

Chinese EFL learners’ engagement with ChatGPT feedback on academic writing: A case study in Malaysia

Zhang Kailin University of Malaya ; Murad Abdu Saeed

Abstract

• Postgraduates engaged behaviorally, affectively, and cognitively with GenAI feedback. • Postgraduates dealt with ChatGPT primarily as a tool for refining their proposals, not for generating content. • Postgraduates demonstrated agency by actively questioning, annotating, and negotiating feedback. • Postgraduates engaged in diverse affective responses, ranging from appreciation to frustration. As Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools such as ChatGPT are becoming increasingly integrated into English as a Foreign Language (EFL) academic writing context, learners’ engagement with AI-generated feedback remains insufficiently examined. This case study investigated how four Chinese EFL postgraduates joining a course in a Malaysian university engaged with ChatGPT feedback while revising their academic research proposals. The study triangulated screen recordings, pre- and post-revision drafts, and stimulated recall interviews. Participants displayed a range of behavioural strategies, including accepting, questioning, rejecting suggestions, annotating visually, and seeking external validation. Affective responses ranged from appreciation and curiosity to doubt and frustration, particularly when feedback appeared conflicting or imprecise. Cognitively, learners applied various strategies such as evaluating, comparing, negotiating feedback, and regulating its use. Yet, they showed differing levels of engagement, shaped by individual perceptions and writing intentions. Importantly, participants regarded ChatGPT as a tool for linguistic refinement rather than content generation. Overall, the findings revealed that learners did not passively receive feedback but interacted with it in agentive and critical ways. The study highlights the interplay among these three dimensions of engagement and the importance of individual differences when evaluating the pedagogical potential of GenAI-generated feedback in academic writing.

Journal
Computers and Composition
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
10.1016/j.compcom.2025.102976
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
qualitative research artificial intelligence multilingual writers

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (4)

  1. Manierre et al. (2025)
    Coexisting with ChatGPT: Evaluating a tool for AI-based paper revision
    Computers and Composition
  2. Bedington et al. (2024)
    Writing with generative AI and human-machine teaming: Insights and recommendati…
    Computers and Composition
  3. Vetter et al. (2024)
    Towards a framework for local interrogation of AI ethics: A case study on text …
    Computers and Composition
  4. Tardy (2012)
    Voice Construction, Assessment, and Extra-Textual Identity
    Research in the Teaching of English
Also cites 63 works outside this index ↓
  1. Afifi (2023)
    Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing: A multiple case study
    The JALT CALL Journal  ↗
  2. Al Mahmud (2023)
    Investigating EFL students' writing skills through artificial intelligence: Wordtune appl…
    Journal of Language Teaching & Research  ↗
  3. Alsaedi (2024)
    ChatGPT and ESL/EFL writing: A systematic review of advantages and challenges
    English Language Teaching  ↗
  4. Banihashem (2024)
    Feedback sources in essay writing: Peer-generated or AI-generated feedback?
    International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education  ↗
  5. Barrot (2023)
    Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Pitfalls and potentials
    Assessing Writing  ↗
  6. Bartolucci (2020)
    Reading aloud narrative material as a means for the student's cognitive empowerment
    Mind, Brain, and Education  ↗
  7. Cheng (2021)
    Teacher written feedback on English as a foreign language learners’ writing: Examining na…
    Frontiers in Psychology  ↗
  8. Cheng (2024)
    Engaging secondary school students with peer feedback in L2 writing classrooms: A mixed-m…
    Studies in Educational Evaluation  ↗
  9. Cheng (2023)
    Understanding student engagement with teacher and peer feedback in L2 writing
    System  ↗
  10. Datskiv (2024)
    Developing future teachers' academic writing and critical thinking skills using ChatGPT
    International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning  ↗
  11. Diab (2015)
    Effectiveness of written corrective feedback: Does type of error and type of correction matter?
    Assessing Writing  ↗
  12. Escalante (2023)
    AI-generated feedback on writing: Insights into efficacy and ENL student preference
    International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education  ↗
  13. Floridi (2020)
    GPT-3: Its nature, scope, limits, and consequences
    Minds and Machines  ↗
  14. Fredricks (2004)
    School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence
    Review of Educational Research  ↗
  15. Fu (2024)
    Visibilizing invisible engagement behind students’ no-revision operation to written feedback
    Language Teaching Research  ↗
  16. Han (2015)
    Exploring learner engagement with written corrective feedback in a Chinese tertiary EFL c…
    Journal of Second Language Writing  ↗
  17. Hyland (2008)
    Academic clusters: Text patterning in published and postgraduate writing
    International Journal of Applied Linguistics  ↗
  18. Ibrahim (2024)
    Potentials and implications of ChatGPT for ESL writing instruction
    The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning  ↗
  19. Ismail (2018)
    Students engaged in learning
    New Directions for Teaching and Learning  ↗
  20. Kang (2023)
    Beyond ChatGPT: Multimodal generative AI for L2 writers
    Journal of Second Language Writing  ↗
  21. Kim (2020)
    Dynamic learner engagement in a wiki-enhanced writing course
    Journal of Computing in Higher Education  ↗
  22. King (2023)
    A conversation on artificial intelligence, chatbots, and plagiarism in higher education
    Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering  ↗
  23. Koltovskaia (2020)
    Student engagement with automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) provided by Grammarl…
    Assessing Writing  ↗
  24. Koltovskaia (2024)
    Graduate students’ use of ChatGPT for academic text revision: Behavioral, cognitive, and …
    Journal of Second Language Writing  ↗
  25. Kubota (2023)
    Another contradiction in AI-assisted second language writing
    Journal of Second Language Writing  ↗
  26. Lee (2014)
    Revisiting teacher feedback in EFL writing from sociocultural perspectives
    Tesol Quarterly  ↗
  27. Li (2024)
    Understanding changes in learner engagement with peer feedback giving in EFL writing: A l…
    Studies in Educational Evaluation  ↗
  28. Lingard (2023)
    Writing with ChatGPT: An illustration of its capacity, limitations & implications for aca…
    Perspectives on Medical Education  ↗
  29. Mahapatra (2024)
    Impact of ChatGPT on ESL students’ academic writing skills: A mixed methods intervention study
    Smart Learning Environments  ↗
  30. Marzuki (2023)
    The impact of AI writing tools on the content and organization of students’ writing: EFL …
    Cogent Education  ↗
  31. McGrew (2019)
    Improving university students’ web savvy: An intervention study
    British Journal of Educational Psychology  ↗
  32. Mizumoto (2024)
    Testing the viability of ChatGPT as a companion in L2 writing accuracy assessment
    Research Methods in Applied Linguistics  ↗
  33. Oktarin (2024)
    Leveraging ChatGPT to enhance students’ writing skills, engagement, and feedback literacy
    Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology  ↗
  34. Panadero (2023)
    Effects of rubrics on academic performance, self-regulated learning, and self-efficacy: A…
    Educational Psychology Review  ↗
  35. Polakova (2024)
    The impact of ChatGPT feedback on the development of EFL students’ writing skills
    Cogent Education  ↗
  36. Qi (2023)
    The promise and peril of ChatGPT in geriatric nursing education: What we know and do not know
    Aging and Health Research  ↗
  37. Rahman (2023)
    ChatGPT for education and research: Opportunities, threats, and strategies
    Applied Sciences  ↗
  38. Saeed (2023)
    Towards fostering Saudi EFL learners' collaborative engagement and feedback literacy in writing
    Assessing Writing  ↗
  39. Saeed (2024)
    Examining teacher’s evaluative language in written, audio and screencast feedback on EFL …
    Assessing Writing  ↗
  40. Schiller (2024)
    Understanding the effectiveness of automated feedback: Using process data to uncover the …
    Computers & Education  ↗
  41. Steiss (2024)
    Comparing the quality of human and ChatGPT feedback of students’ writing
    Learning and Instruction  ↗
  42. Strobl (2024)
    Adopting ChatGPT as a writing buddy in the advanced L2 writing class
    Technology in Language Teaching & Learning  ↗
  43. Tam (2025)
    Interacting with ChatGPT for internal feedback and factors affecting feedback quality
    Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education  ↗
  44. Thorp (2023)
    ChatGPT is fun, but not an author
    Science  ↗
  45. Tian (2020)
    Learner engagement with automated feedback, peer feedback and teacher feedback in an onli…
    System  ↗
  46. Wang (2024)
    Modeling the interaction between teacher credibility, teacher confirmation, and English m…
    Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching  ↗
  47. Wang (2024)
    Using AI-driven chatbots to foster Chinese EFL students’ academic engagement: An interven…
    Computers in Human Behavior  ↗
  48. Wang (2023)
    Chinese EFL teachers’ writing assessment feedback literacy: A scale development and valid…
    Assessing Writing  ↗
  49. Wang (2022)
    Computer-assisted EFL writing and evaluations based on artificial intelligence: A case fr…
    Library Hi Tech  ↗
  50. Wei (2024)
    Academic English writing challenges in a blended EFL and ESL learning environment: Insigh…
    International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research  ↗
  51. Wineburg (2019)
    Lateral reading and the nature of expertise: Reading less and learning more when evaluati…
    Teachers College Record  ↗
  52. Woodworth (2020)
    Perspectives on using automated writing evaluation systems to provide written corrective …
    TESL Canada Journal  ↗
  53. Xiaosa (2025)
    How L2 student writers engage with automated feedback: A longitudinal perspective
    Assessing Writing  ↗
  54. Yan (2024)
    L2 writer engagement with automated written corrective feedback provided by ChatGPT: A mi…
    Humanities and Social Sciences Communications  ↗
  55. Yao (2025)
    Secondary school English teachers’ application of artificial intelligence-guided chatbot …
    Journal of Second Language Writing  ↗
  56. Yeung (2025)
    University students’ engagement with generative AI-supported automated writing evaluation…
    Journal of Second Language Writing  ↗
  57. Yu (2019)
    Understanding student engagement with peer feedback on master’s theses: A Macau study
    Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education  ↗
  58. Yuan (2024)
    The impact of ChatGPT on learners in English academic writing: Opportunities and challeng…
    Language Learning in Higher Education  ↗
  59. Zhan (2025)
    Generative artificial intelligence as an enabler of student feedback engagement: A framework
    Higher Education Research & Development  ↗
  60. Zhang (2018)
    Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing
    Assessing Writing  ↗
  61. Zhang (2022)
    Fostering student engagement with feedback: An integrated approach
    Assessing Writing  ↗
  62. Zhang (2023)
    Student engagement with peer feedback in L2 writing: Insights from reflective journaling …
    Assessing Writing  ↗
  63. Zheng (2018)
    Student engagement with teacher written corrective feedback in EFL writing: A case study …
    Assessing Writing  ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network →

Related Articles

  1. College Composition and Communication Sep 2025
    Using the AI Life Cycle to Unblackbox AI Tools: Teaching Résumé 2.0 with Résumé Analytics and Computational Job-Résumé Matching ↗
    Huiling Ding
    qualitative research artificial intelligence professional writing multilingual writers
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Oct 2024
    Role Play: Conversational Roles as a Framework for Reflexive Practice in AI-Assisted Qualitative Research ↗
    Luke Thominet; Jacqueline Amorim; Kristine Acosta; Vanessa K. Sohan
    qualitative research multimodality artificial intelligence technical communication multilingual writers
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication Jul 2024
    Exploring Artificial Intelligence Tool Use in a Nonprofit Workplace ↗
    Andrew Hillen
    qualitative research artificial intelligence technical communication multilingual writers argument
  4. Pedagogy Apr 2024
    “This Weird Thing I'm Discovering” ↗
    Chris W. Gallagher
    graduate education qualitative research artificial intelligence multilingual writers
  5. Rhetoric & Public Affairs Mar 2024
    The Dynamics of Technological Spectacle in Billy Mitchell's Campaign for Aerial War ↗
    Benjamin Firgens
    qualitative research artificial intelligence multilingual writers