Assessing Writing Apr 2020

Student engagement with automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) provided by Grammarly: A multiple case study

Svetlana Koltovskaia
Journal
Assessing Writing
Published
2020-04-01
DOI
10.1016/j.asw.2020.100450
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Topics
qualitative research

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (13)

  1. Long et al. (2026)
    An ecological approach to L2 learners’ engagement with written feedback
    Assessing Writing
  2. Ma et al. (2026)
    L2 learners’ engagement with AI-generated feedback on writing
    Assessing Writing
  3. Kim et al. (2025)
    The effect of metacognitive instruction with indirect written corrective feedba…
    Assessing Writing
  4. Mau et al. (2025)
    Integrating move analysis and sentence reconstruction in automated writing eval…
    Assessing Writing
  5. Barrot (2025)
    Trinka: Facilitating academic writing through an intelligent writing evaluation…
    Assessing Writing
Show all 13 →
  1. Xiaosa et al. (2025)
    How L2 student writers engage with automated feedback: A longitudinal perspective
    Assessing Writing
  2. Qayyum (2024)
    A teacher’s inquiry into diagnostic assessment in an EAP writing course
    Assessing Writing
  3. Li (2023)
    Using Peerceptiv to support AI-based online writing assessment across the disciplines
    Assessing Writing
  4. Carr (2023)
    Feedback on writing through the lens of activity theory: An exploration of chan…
    Assessing Writing
  5. McCarthy et al. (2022)
    Automated writing evaluation: Does spelling and grammar feedback support high-q…
    Assessing Writing
  6. Zhang et al. (2022)
    Fostering student engagement with feedback: An integrated approach
    Assessing Writing
  7. Yao et al. (2021)
    Perceptions of the inclusion of Automatic Writing Evaluation in peer assessment…
    Assessing Writing
  8. Dong et al. (2021)
    Using Grammarly to support students’ source-based writing practices
    Assessing Writing

Cites in this index (4)

  1. Zheng et al. (2018)
    Student engagement with teacher written corrective feedback in EFL writing: A c…
    Assessing Writing
  2. Zhang et al. (2018)
    Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing
    Assessing Writing
  3. Dikli et al. (2014)
    Automated Essay Scoring feedback for second language writers: How does it compa…
    Assessing Writing
  4. Stevenson et al. (2014)
    The effects of computer-generated feedback on the quality of writing
    Assessing Writing
Also cites 20 works outside this index ↓
  1. Bai (2017)
    In the face of fallible AWE feedback: How do students respond?
    Educational Psychology  ↗
  2. Chapelle (2015)
    Validity arguments for diagnostic assessment using automated writing evaluation
    Language Testing  ↗
  3. Chen (2008)
    Beyond the design of automated writing evaluation: Pedagogical practices and perceived le…
    Language Learning & Technology  ↗
  4. El-Ebyary (2010)
    The impact of computer-based feedback on students’ written work
    International Journal of English Studies  ↗
  5. Ellis (2010)
    Epilogue: A framework for investigating oral and written corrective feedback
    Studies in Second Language Acquisition  ↗
  6. Enright (2010)
    Complementing human judgment of essays written by English language learners with e-rater®…
    Language Testing  ↗
  7. Fredricks (2004)
    School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence
    Review of Educational Research  ↗
  8. Han (2015)
    Exploring learner engagement with written corrective feedback in Chinese tertiary EFL classroom
    Journal of Second Language Writing  ↗
  9. Lai (2010)
    Which do students prefer to evaluate their essays: Peers or computer program
    British Journal of Educational Technology  ↗
  10. Li (2015)
    Rethinking the role of automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback in ESL writing instruction
    Journal of Second Language Writing  ↗
  11. Li (2017)
    The short-term and long-term effects of AWE feedback on ESL students’ development of gram…
    CALICO Journal  ↗
  12. Liao (2015)
    Using automated writing evaluation to reduce grammar errors in writing
    ELT Journal  ↗
  13. Powers (2002)
    Comparing the validity of automated and human scoring of essays
    Journal of Educational Computing Research  ↗
  14. Qassemzadeh (2016)
    The impact of feedback provision by Grammarly software and teachers on learning passive s…
    Theory and Practice in Language Studies  ↗
  15. Ranalli (2018)
    Automated written corrective feedback: How well can students make use of it?
    Computer Assisted Language Learning  ↗
  16. Ranalli (2017)
    Automated writing evaluation for formative assessment of second language writing: Investi…
    Educational Psychology  ↗
  17. Swain (1995)
    Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second langu…
    Applied Linguistics  ↗
  18. Warden (2000)
    EFL business writing behaviors in differing feedback environments
    Language Learning  ↗
  19. Warschauer (2008)
    Automated writing assessment in the classroom
    Pedagogies  ↗
  20. Warschauer (2006)
    Automated writing evaluation: Defining the classroom research agenda
    Language Teaching Research  ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 242 View in citation network →

Related Articles

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication Apr 2026
    From Monologue to Dialogue: Communication Strategies of Chinese Museums on Weibo and the Imperative for Participation Awareness ↗
    Xiaole Zhu; Yoonjae Nam
    qualitative research social media
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Mar 2026
    “It's Hard to Show ROI When You’re Preventing Things from Happening”: How Impact Storytelling Frames Community Health Initiatives for Executive Audiences ↗
    Margaret Hsiao
    qualitative research multimodality technical communication professional writing multilingual writers
  3. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Mar 2026
    Charismatic Leadership Communication: A Finnish Perspective ↗
    Lauri Tapio Louekari
    qualitative research multilingual writers voice and style affect and writing
  4. Computers and Composition Mar 2026
    Chinese EFL learners’ engagement with ChatGPT feedback on academic writing: A case study in Malaysia ↗
    Zhang Kailin; Murad Abdu Saeed
    qualitative research artificial intelligence multilingual writers
  5. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Feb 2026
    Techno-Social Imbrications for Efficient Online Media Appropriation: Insights from Industry ↗
    Apoorva Bharadwaj
    empirical research qualitative research multimodality multilingual writers