Abstract

Peerceptiv is a peer assessment tool developed by learning sciences researchers to help students demonstrate disciplinary knowledge through writing feedback practices. This review of Peerceptiv describes its key features while comparing it with other writing feedback tools and suggesting possibilities and limitations of using it to support AI-based online writing assessment across the disciplines. Future considerations regarding the use of Peerceptiv in assessing, teaching, and researching online writing are discussed.

Journal
Assessing Writing
Published
2023-07-01
DOI
10.1016/j.asw.2023.100746
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export

Citation Context

References (35) · 8 in this index

  1. Assessing Writing
  2. The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback, Assessment & E…
    Education
  3. Validity and reliability of scaffolded peer assessment of writing from instructor and stu…
    Journal of Educational Psychology  
  4. Assessing Writing
  5. Assessing students’ peer feedback literacy in writing: Scale development and validation
    Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education  
Show all 35 →
  1. The bilateral benefits of providing and receiving peer feedback in academic writing acros…
    Studies in Educational Evaluation  
  2. The alignment of written peer feedback with draft problems and its impact on revision in …
    Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education  
  3. Journal of Writing Research
  4. Assessing Writing
  5. Assessing Writing
  6. Scoring rubric reliability and internal validity in rater-mediated EFL writing assessment…
    Reading and Writing  
  7. Exploring revision as a self-regulated process in EFL writing
  8. Unpacking an online peer-mediated and self-reflective revision process in second-language…
    Reading and Writing
  9. Tracing the path toward self-regulated revision: An interplay of instructor feedback, pee…
    Frontiers in Psychology  
  10. Multimodalities and Chinese learners’ L2 practices: Positioning, agency, and community
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  11. Research in the Teaching of English
  12. To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer’s own writing
    Journal of Second Language Writing  
  13. Backward evaluation in peer assessment: A scoping review
    Computers & Education  
  14. Stop! Grammar time: University students’ perceptions of the automated feedback program Gr…
    Australasian Journal of Educational Technology
  15. Peer review of writing: Learning from revision using peer feedback and reviewing peers’ texts
  16. Journal of Writing Research
  17. Peering into large lectures: Examining peer and expert mark agreement using peerScholar, …
    Journal of Computer Assisted Learning  
  18. Technology in second language writing: Advances in composing, translation, writing pedagogy and data-driven learning
  19. The reliability and validity of peer review of writing in high school AP English classes
    Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy  
  20. What ChatGPT and generative AI mean for science
    Nature  
  21. Peer assessment
    Theory Into Practice  
  22. Very like a whale: The assessment of writing programs
  23. From feedback to revisions: Effects of feedback features and perceptions
    Contemporary Educational Psychology  
  24. Assessing Writing
  25. Charting the routes to revision: An interplay of writing goals, peer comments, and self-r…
    Instructional Science  
  26. Changes in the reliability and validity of peer assessment across the college years
    Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education  
  27. EFL student engagement with giving peer feedback in academic writing: A longitudinal study
    Journal of English for Academic Purposes  
  28. Dialogue within peer feedback processes: Clarification and negotiation of meaning
    Higher Education Research & Development  
  29. Learning to improve the quality peer feedback through experience with peer feedback
    Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education  
  30. Student attitudes that predict participation in peer assessment
    Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education