Assessing Writing Oct 2014

Automated Essay Scoring feedback for second language writers: How does it compare to instructor feedback?

Semire Dikli ; Susan Bleyle
Journal
Assessing Writing
Published
2014-10-01
DOI
10.1016/j.asw.2014.03.006
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (6)

  1. Kim et al. (2025)
    The impact of self-revision, machine translation, and ChatGPT on L2 writing: Ra…
    Assessing Writing
  2. Wilson et al. (2024)
    Validity of automated essay scores for elementary-age English language learners…
    Assessing Writing
  3. McCarthy et al. (2022)
    Automated writing evaluation: Does spelling and grammar feedback support high-q…
    Assessing Writing
  4. Zhang et al. (2022)
    Fostering student engagement with feedback: An integrated approach
    Assessing Writing
  5. Koltovskaia (2020)
    Student engagement with automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) provided b…
    Assessing Writing
Show all 6 →
  1. Zhang (2020)
    Engaging with automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback on L2 writing: Studen…
    Assessing Writing

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 13 works outside this index ↓
  1. Ashwell (2000)
    Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom…
    Journal of Second Language Writing  ↗
  2. Bitchener (2010)
    Raising the linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2 writers with written corrective feedback
    Journal of Second Language Writing  ↗
  3. Chandler (2003)
    The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluen…
    Journal of Second Language Writing  ↗
  4. Chodorow (2010)
    The utility of article and preposition error correction systems for English language lear…
    Language Testing  ↗
  5. Doolan (2012)
    Generation 1.5 written error patterns: A comparative study
    Journal of Second Language Writing  ↗
  6. Ferris (1995)
    Student reactions to teacher response in multiple draft composition 35 classrooms
    TESOL Quarterly  ↗
  7. Leacock (2010)
    Automated grammatical error detection for language learners
    Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies  ↗
  8. Truscott (1996)
    The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes
    Language Learning  ↗
  9. Truscott (2004)
    Evidence and conjecture on the effects of correction: A response to Chandler
    Journal of Second Language Writing  ↗
  10. Truscott (2007)
    The effect of error correction on learners’ ability to write accurately
    Journal of Second Language Writing  ↗
  11. Warschauer (2008)
    Automated writing assessment in the classroom
    Pedagogies  ↗
  12. Warschauer (2006)
    Automated writing evaluation: Defining the classroom research agenda
    Language Teaching Research  ↗
  13. Zamel (1985)
    Responding to student writing
    TESOL Quarterly  ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 128 View in citation network →