Student perceptions of screen recording and screencast assignments in first-year writing

Julie Townsend Cleveland State University ; Melanie Gagich Cleveland State University

Abstract

• Students reported better understanding of writing with screencast assignments. • Students reported technology gains from screencast and screen recording assignments. • Students reported screencast and screen recording assignments were not complicated. • Blending spontaneous speech with the writing process helped students. • Students may feel self conscious when recording their screens and voices. Inexperienced writers often resist meaningful revision, which underscores the need for pedagogical approaches that foster deeper engagement. This study explores the use of student-led screen recordings and screencasts as pedagogical tools to promote students’ ownership and confidence in their writing processes. Our study surveyed 76 student writers in First-Year Writing classrooms to investigate this approach. The findings suggest that these assignments are easy to use, focus writers’ attention on the writing process, and leverage learning opportunities afforded by the transmodal blends of writing, video, and speech. Specifically, students reported more benefits from screencast assignments that allowed them to blend spontaneous speech into the writing process. Additionally, students reported that their technology skills improved after completing either the screencast or screen recording assignment. One downside was that students tended to feel self-conscious when recording their screens and voices. Overall, these student-led assignments are worth exploring in composition classrooms as they can lead to a deeper, more hands-on understanding of the writing process.

Journal
Computers and Composition
Published
2026-06-01
DOI
10.1016/j.compcom.2026.102979
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (17)

  1. Computers and Composition
  2. Computers and Composition
  3. Computers and Composition
  4. Computers and Composition
  5. Computers and Composition
Show all 17 →
  1. Computers and Composition
  2. Computers and Composition
  3. Computers and Composition
  4. Computers and Composition
  5. Computers and Composition
  6. Computers and Composition
  7. College Composition and Communication
  8. College Composition and Communication
  9. College Composition and Communication
  10. College Composition and Communication
  11. College Composition and Communication
  12. College Composition and Communication
Also cites 8 works outside this index ↓
  1. Video killed the multiple-choice quiz: capturing pharmacy students' literature searching …
    Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA  
  2. Using technology and structured peer reviews to enhance students’ writing
    Active Learning in Higher Education  
  3. A pedagogy of multiliteracies: designing social futures
    Harvard Educational Review  
  4. Students' conditioned response to teachers' response: portfolio proponents, take note!
    Assessing Writing  
  5. Academic style with substance: A collaborative screencasting project to support referenci…
    The Electronic Library  
  6. Increasing critical language awareness through translingual practices in academic writing
    Journal of English for Academic Purposes  
  7. Completing the first assignment: A case study of the writing processes of a successful an…
    Journal of English for Academic Purposes  
  8. Leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) technology for English writing: introducing wordt…
    RELC Journal  
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →