Abstract

Rhetoric and composition’s increasing attention to multimodal composing involves challenges that go beyond issues of access to digital technologies and electronic composing environments. As a specific case study, this article explores the history of aural composing modalities (speech, music, sound) and examines how they have been understood and used within English and composition classrooms and generally subsumed by the written word in such settings. I argue that the relationship between aurality (and visual modalities) and writing has limited our understanding of composing as a multimodal rhetorical activity and has thus, deprived students of valuable semiotic resources for making meaning. Further, in light of scholarship on the importance of aurality to different communities and cultures, I argue that our contemporary adherence to alphabetic-only composition constrains the semiotic efforts of individuals and groups who value multiple modalities of expression. I encourage teachers and scholars of composition, and other disciplines, to adopt an increasingly thoughtful understanding of aurality and the role it—and other modalities—can play in contemporary communication tasks.

Journal
College Composition and Communication
Published
2009-06-01
DOI
10.58680/ccc20097190
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (44)

  1. Computers and Composition
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Pedagogy
  4. Written Communication
  5. Computers and Composition
Show all 44 →
  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Pedagogy
  3. Computers and Composition
  4. Computers and Composition
  5. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  6. Computers and Composition
  7. Computers and Composition
  8. Writing and Pedagogy
  9. Computers and Composition
  10. Computers and Composition
  11. Computers and Composition
  12. Computers and Composition
  13. Reflections: A Journal of Community-Engaged Writing and Rhetoric
  14. Pedagogy
  15. Pedagogy
  16. Computers and Composition
  17. Computers and Composition
  18. Written Communication
  19. Computers and Composition
  20. Computers and Composition
  21. Computers and Composition
  22. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  23. Computers and Composition
  24. Rhetoric Review
  25. Computers and Composition
  26. Computers and Composition
  27. Computers and Composition
  28. Pedagogy
  29. Computers and Composition
  30. Pedagogy
  31. Computers and Composition
  32. Computers and Composition
  33. Computers and Composition
  34. Rhetoric Review
  35. Computers and Composition
  36. Computers and Composition
  37. Pedagogy
  38. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  39. Computers and Composition

References (0)

No references on file for this article.