Abstract

Rhetoric and composition’s increasing attention to multimodal composing involves challenges that go beyond issues of access to digital technologies and electronic composing environments. As a specific case study, this article explores the history of aural composing modalities (speech, music, sound) and examines how they have been understood and used within English and composition classrooms and generally subsumed by the written word in such settings. I argue that the relationship between aurality (and visual modalities) and writing has limited our understanding of composing as a multimodal rhetorical activity and has thus, deprived students of valuable semiotic resources for making meaning. Further, in light of scholarship on the importance of aurality to different communities and cultures, I argue that our contemporary adherence to alphabetic-only composition constrains the semiotic efforts of individuals and groups who value multiple modalities of expression. I encourage teachers and scholars of composition, and other disciplines, to adopt an increasingly thoughtful understanding of aurality and the role it—and other modalities—can play in contemporary communication tasks.

Journal
College Composition and Communication
Published
2009-06-01
DOI
10.58680/ccc20097190
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (42)

  1. Computers and Composition
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Pedagogy
  4. Written Communication
  5. Computers and Composition
Show all 42 →
  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Pedagogy
  3. Computers and Composition
  4. Computers and Composition
  5. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  6. Computers and Composition
  7. Computers and Composition
  8. Computers and Composition
  9. Computers and Composition
  10. Computers and Composition
  11. Computers and Composition
  12. Pedagogy
  13. Pedagogy
  14. Computers and Composition
  15. Computers and Composition
  16. Written Communication
  17. Computers and Composition
  18. Computers and Composition
  19. Computers and Composition
  20. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  21. Computers and Composition
  22. Rhetoric Review
  23. Computers and Composition
  24. Computers and Composition
  25. Computers and Composition
  26. Pedagogy
  27. Computers and Composition
  28. Pedagogy
  29. Computers and Composition
  30. Computers and Composition
  31. Computers and Composition
  32. Rhetoric Review
  33. Computers and Composition
  34. Computers and Composition
  35. Pedagogy
  36. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  37. Computers and Composition

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

CrossRef global citation count: 73 View in citation network →