College Composition and Communication Dec 1981

Analyzing Revision

Lester Faigley ; Stephen Witte

Abstract

Preview this article: Analyzing Revision, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/ccc/32/4/collegecompositionandcommunication15887-1.gif

Journal
College Composition and Communication
Published
1981-12-01
DOI
10.58680/ccc198115887
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
revision
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (15)

  1. Townsend et al. (2026)
    Student perceptions of screen recording and screencast assignments in first-yea…
    Computers and Composition
  2. Gao et al. (2026)
    Modeling Writing Processes and Predicting Text Quality in Technical Communication
    Written Communication
  3. Smith et al. (2025)
    Introducing TrackEDT: A Tool to Accelerate Empirical Editing Research
    IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  4. Zhang et al. (2023)
    Student engagement with peer feedback in L2 writing: Insights from reflective j…
    Assessing Writing
  5. McCarthy et al. (2022)
    Automated writing evaluation: Does spelling and grammar feedback support high-q…
    Assessing Writing
Show all 15 →
  1. Rossetti et al. (2022)
    Accessible Communication of Corporate Social Responsibility: Development and Pr…
    Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  2. Conijn et al. (2022)
    A Product- and Process-Oriented Tagset for Revisions in Writing
    Written Communication
  3. Zhang et al. (2022)
    Fostering student engagement with feedback: An integrated approach
    Assessing Writing
  4. Latif (2021)
    Remodeling writers’ composing processes: Implications for writing assessment
    Assessing Writing
  5. Elabdali et al. (2020)
    Group Dynamics across Interaction Modes in L2 Collaborative Wiki Writing
    Computers and Composition
  6. Wang et al. (2020)
    eRevis(ing): Students’ revision of text evidence use in an automated writing ev…
    Assessing Writing
  7. Zhang (2020)
    Engaging with automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback on L2 writing: Studen…
    Assessing Writing
  8. Hewett et al. (2019)
    Online Metaphorical Feedback and Students’ Textual Revisions: An Embodied Cogni…
    Computers and Composition
  9. Neumann et al. (2019)
    Using Google Docs for Peer-then-Teacher Review on Middle School Students’ Writing
    Computers and Composition
  10. Chen et al. (2019)
    Assessing student-writers’ self-efficacy beliefs about text revision in EFL writing
    Assessing Writing

References (0)

No references on file for this article.

CrossRef global citation count: 1000 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Computers and Composition Jun 2026
    Student perceptions of screen recording and screencast assignments in first-year writing ↗
    Julie Townsend; Melanie Gagich
    first-year composition writing pedagogy revision
  2. Assessing Writing Apr 2026
    An ecological approach to L2 learners’ engagement with written feedback ↗
    Zaibo Long; Jinfen Xu
    revision
  3. Assessing Writing Apr 2026
    L2 learners’ engagement with AI-generated feedback on writing ↗
    Xinyu Ma; Cong Zhang; Icy Lee
    revision
  4. Computers and Composition Mar 2026
    Chinese EFL learners’ engagement with ChatGPT feedback on academic writing: A case study in Malaysia ↗
    Zhang Kailin; Murad Abdu Saeed
    writing pedagogy revision qualitative research artificial intelligence multilingual writers
  5. Written Communication Feb 2026
    Reading Medium and Communicative Purpose in Writing: Effects on Pausing Behaviour and Text Quality, Controlling for Reading Comprehension and Executive Functions ↗
    Ángel Valenzuela; Cristian A. Rojas-Barahona; Ramón D. Castillo; Ladislao Salmerón
    discourse analysis curriculum design revision assessment