IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Dec 2025

Introducing TrackEDT: A Tool to Accelerate Empirical Editing Research

Jordan Smith University of Northern Colorado ; Matthew J. Baker ; Lauryn Wilde Brigham Young University ; Scout McMillan

Abstract

<bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><i>Introduction:</i></b> The technical editing discipline stands in need of additional empirical research—particularly language-level research. However, the time- and resource-intensive nature of data collection and analysis may prevent some scholars from completing the needed research. Therefore, this tutorial introduces TrackEDT, a tool we have developed to ease the process of collecting and analyzing edits and comments from edited documents. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><i>Key concepts:</i></b> TrackEDT extracts editors’ tracked insertions, deletions, moves, and comments from Microsoft (MS) Word documents—all elements of traditional editorial markup. It outputs the extracted data into an MS Excel format that affords easier analysis of the editors’ data than would be possible in the data’s original MS Word format. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><i>Key lessons:</i></b> Researchers can download TrackEDT as an executable file at <uri xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">editingresearch.byu.edu/trackedt</uri>. To run the file, they select a folder containing edited MS Word documents that have tracked changes and comments. After TrackEDT processes the documents, the researchers can analyze the extracted tracked changes, comments, and metadata in the resulting Excel reports, which include information such as who made the edit, what type of edit was made, when the edit was made, how long the edit was, and what comments were appended. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><i>Implications for practice:</i></b> Technical editing researchers can use TrackEDT and its reports to ease their collection and analysis of editing data, thereby answering important empirical research questions related to language-level editorial changes and processes.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2025.3615256
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
empirical research
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (21)

  1. Schreiber (2024)
    What Is Technical About Technical Editing?
    IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. Mackiewicz et al. (2024)
    Editors’ Use of Comprehensive Style Guides: The Case of Singular <i…
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Mallette (2024)
    Preparing Future Technical Editors for an Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Workplace
    Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Mackiewicz et al. (2024)
    Editors’ Perceptions of Singular <i>They</i>
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Smith (2023)
    Corpus Linguistics and Technical Editing: How Corpora Can Help Copy Editors Ado…
    Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Show all 21 →
  1. Gallagher et al. (2022)
    Project-Oriented Web Scraping in Technical Communication Research
    Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Clem et al. (2022)
    Unjust Revisions: A Social Justice Framework for Technical Editing
    IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  3. Baker et al. (2021)
    An Editing Process for Blind or Visually Impaired Editors
    IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  4. Gubala et al. (2020)
    Do Writing Errors Bother Professionals? An Analysis of the Most Bothersome Erro…
    Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Doan (2019)
    Contradictory Comments: Feedback in Professional Communication Service Courses
    IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  6. Boettger et al. (2018)
    Analyzing Error Perception and Recognition Among Professional Communication Pra…
    Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  7. Kreth et al. (2017)
    A Descriptive Survey of Technical Editors
    IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  8. Boettger (2016)
    Using Corpus-based Instruction to Explore Writing Variation Across the Discipli…
    Across the Disciplines
  9. Wininger (2014)
    Measuring the evolution of a revised document
    Journal of Writing Research
  10. Blakeslee (2009)
    The Technical Communication Research Landscape
    Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  11. Bisaillon (2007)
    Professional Editing Strategies Used by Six Editors
    Written Communication
  12. Blakeslee et al. (2004)
    The State of Research in Technical Communication
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  13. Bernhardt (2003)
    Improving Document Review Practices in Pharmaceutical Companies
    Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  14. Wolfe et al. (2001)
    From the Margins to the Center
    Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  15. Johnson (1998)
    Complicating technology: Interdisciplinary method, the burden of comprehension,…
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  16. Faigley et al. (1981)
    Analyzing Revision
    College Composition and Communication
Also cites 16 works outside this index ↓
  1. Flanagan (2019)
    Preface
     ↗
  2. 10.2307/358602
     ↗
  3. 10.1109/procomm53155.2022.00055
     ↗
  4. 10.4324/9781003096962-8
     ↗
  5. 10.55177/tc377227
     ↗
  6. 10.2307/jj.22730732.17
     ↗
  7. 10.37514/PRA-B.2019.0230
     ↗
  8. 10.4324/9781351132756-1
     ↗
  9. 10.2307/j.ctvjghx3t
     ↗
  10. 10.18637/jss.v059.i10
     ↗
  11. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
     ↗
  12. 10.2307/359061
     ↗
  13. 10.2307/jj.22730732.18
     ↗
  14. 10.1057/9781137350466
     ↗
  15. 10.2307/356588
     ↗
  16. 10.37514/TPC-B.2023.2104
     ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Argumentation Mar 2026
    Metaphors and Linguistic Intimacy in Ad Populum Arguments ↗
    Francesca Ervas; Giulia Zucca; Oriana Mosca
    empirical research
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Mar 2026
    Bridging the Gap: A Comparative Study of Students’ and LSPs’ Perceptions of Translation Internships ↗
    Shuang Liu
    collaborative writing assessment professional writing empirical research
  3. Written Communication Feb 2026
    Rhetoric and Affect: The Role of Faith in Student Writers’ Wayfinding ↗
    Amy D. Williams; Jonathan Ostenson
    rhetorical criticism discourse analysis empirical research affect and writing
  4. Journal of Writing Research Feb 2026
    Prompting for scaffolding: A thematic analysis of K-12 students’ use of educational chatbots for writing support ↗
    Jon Olav Sørhaug
    writing pedagogy empirical research qualitative research artificial intelligence
  5. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Feb 2026
    Techno-Social Imbrications for Efficient Online Media Appropriation: Insights from Industry ↗
    Apoorva Bharadwaj
    professional writing empirical research qualitative research