Abstract

Scholars have long argued that technical editing should be viewed as a rhetorical practice in which copy editors take “a situational approach to each individual task” (Buehler, 1980/2003, p. 458). Yet many editing pedagogies still treat some language-level editing tasks, like those that involve prescriptive usage rules, as mechanical rather than rhetorical. This article discusses how empirical data from corpora can help copy editors adopt a more rhetorical view of prescriptive usage rules and introduces corpus linguistics as a methodology that can contribute to technical editing pedagogy.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
2023-04-01
DOI
10.1177/10506519221143125
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (6)

  1. Computers and Composition
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Show all 6 →
  1. Technical Communication Quarterly

References (46) · 8 in this index

  1. About—Conscious Style Guide. (n.d.). https://consciousstyleguide.com/about/
  2. Anthony L. (2021). TagAnt (Version 1.3.0) [Computer software]. Wa…
  3. 10.1017/CBO9780511804489
  4. Readings in rhetorical criticism
  5. Across the Disciplines
Show all 46 →
  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Language and symbolic power
  3. #LancsBox (Version 6.0.0) [Computer software]
  4. 10.4324/9781351132756-4
  5. Technical Communication
  6. Chicago manual of style . (2010). (16th ed.). University of Chicago Press.
  7. Chicago manual of style . (2017). (17th ed.). University of Chicago Press.
  8. 10.1017/S0047404514000748
  9. Technical Communication
  10. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  11. Technical editing
  12. Davies M. (2008). The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA) …
  13. Davies M. (2018). The iWeb Corpus . https://www.english-corpora.o…
  14. DEI scholarly resources. (n.d.). https://www.councilscienceeditors.org/resource-library…
  15. Diversity & inclusion resources . (n.d.). https://aceseditors.org/resources/diversity-i…
  16. Technical Communication
  17. Proper English usage: A sociolinguistic investigation of attitudes towards usage problems…
  18. 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003
  19. 10.4324/9781351132756-2
  20. 10.1093/acref/9780190491482.001.0001
  21. The computational analysis of English: A corpus-based approach
  22. 10.2307/356888
  23. Technical Communication Quarterly
  24. 10.1353/lan.2015.0062
  25. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  26. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  27. Technical Communication
  28. 10.2307/375964
  29. Owen J. (2016, April 2). Copyediting and corpus linguistics [Pres…
  30. Owen J. (2020, August 27). Right, wrong, and relative [Blog]. Arrant pedantry …
  31. Pope M. (2013, April 2). Copyediting principles [Blog]. Mike’s web log …
  32. 10.4324/9781351132756-5
  33. Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). (2010). Americ…
  34. Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). (2020). Americ…
  35. What editors do: The art, craft, and business of book editing
  36. 10.4324/9780429263088
  37. The levels of edit
  38. 10.4324/9780429198748
  39. Style: Ten lessons in clarity and grace
  40. Technical Communication Quarterly
  41. Journal of Business and Technical Communication