Abstract

Twitter is widely used by companies to reach various stakeholders, but how they use this social media platform is still unclear. To investigate how companies use Twitter, this study analyzes the content of the Twitter accounts of four large information technology companies, focusing on the arrangement of different Twitter accounts and on message characteristics (content, message elements, and communication strategies). The results show that companies used architectures of different Twitter accounts to serve various stakeholder groups. The companies’ tweets covered diverse topics within the corporate, marketing, and technical communication domains. The tweets focused more on providing information and promoting action than on facilitating dialogue.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
2020-10-01
DOI
10.1177/1050651920932191
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication

Cites in this index (4)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Also cites 48 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1108/IntR-04-2017-0172
  2. 10.1057/bm.2016.3
  3. 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
  4. 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.01.003
  5. 10.1080/1553118X.2017.1298114
  6. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.11.012
  7. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.07.001
  8. 10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.022
  9. 10.1108/S2043-052320160000009009
  10. 10.1080/1062726X.2013.795866
  11. 10.1177/0899764012471585
  12. Iankova S., Davies I., Archer-Brown C., Marder B., Yau A. (2019). A comparison of social media marketing betw…
  13. 10.1002/asi.21149
  14. 10.1016/j.elerap.2017.05.002
  15. 10.1016/j.bushor.2011.10.009
  16. 10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
  17. 10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.020
  18. 10.1002/smj.2678
  19. 10.1080/15252019.2011.10722187
  20. 10.1145/3068698.3068702
  21. 10.2753/JEC1086-4415180204
  22. 10.1080/15252019.2014.935536
  23. 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01576.x
  24. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.01.005
  25. 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.04.008
  26. 10.2501/IJMR-2013-070
  27. 10.2501/IJA-30-1-013-046
  28. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.12.003
  29. 10.1080/10810730.2012.727956
  30. 10.1080/00909889909365539
  31. 10.2308/isys-50994
  32. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.08.004
  33. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.02.005
  34. 10.1080/1062726X.2014.908721
  35. 10.1177/1750635218810912
  36. 10.3390/su10082617
  37. 10.1108/JCOM-01-2013-0004
  38. 10.2501/JAR-51-1-258-275
  39. 10.1177/2329488415572785
  40. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.08.015
  41. 10.1177/2329488414525400
  42. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.03.002
  43. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.07.002
  44. 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054188
  45. 10.1080/09537325.2019.1587161
  46. 10.1080/09537325.2017.1385759
  47. 10.1108/CCIJ-03-2019-0031
  48. 10.1177/0266666915602522
CrossRef global citation count: 29 View in citation network →