Power, Freedom, and Privacy on a Discipline-and-Control Facebook, and the Implications for Internet Governance

Ming Cheung; Zhen Troy Chen

doi:10.1109/tpc.2022.3191103

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Dec 2022

Power, Freedom, and Privacy on a Discipline-and-Control Facebook, and the Implications for Internet Governance

Ming Cheung ; Zhen Troy Chen Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology

Abstract

<bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Background: The proliferation and penetration of social media into professional and everyday lives have reshaped the way in which people deal with their personal information and call for refreshed perceptions and conceptualizations of the power relationship between individual users and technology giants. Despite intensified privacy concerns and crises over social media, there is little research on the correlations between users’ privacy perception and protection in non-Western settings. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Research question: To what extent are Hong Kong Facebook users willing to sacrifice control over their information in exchange for self-expression, sociality, and intimacy in their social roles and relationships? <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Literature review: We first identified a gap in the literature on user perceptions and concerns over privacy in Eastern cultures, which is scarce despite the increasing concern over privacy in professional communication. Informed by the recent literature on the privacy paradox and Foucault and Deleuze's work on power, the unbalanced and normalizing power relationship between Facebook and its users in Eastern contexts is identified as a synthesis of discipline and control. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Research methodology: Data from a survey of 797 young users in Hong Kong were used for our analysis of privacy perception and protection. The survey contained three sections: Facebook usage, attitudes and behaviors, and basic demographics. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Results: The findings support our hypotheses in revealing that the privacy paradox is evident for Facebook users in Hong Kong. In addition, excessive Facebook use leads to reactive privacy awareness and normalization behaviors. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Conclusion: We believe that technology giants, such as Facebook, should be pioneers in safeguarding users’ privacy while encouraging the establishment of social relationships and freedom of expression. The implications for internet governance are discussed from a multistakeholder perspective.

Journal: IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published: 2022-12-01
DOI: 10.1109/tpc.2022.3191103
CompPile: Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access: Closed
Topics: professional writing social media
Export: BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (11)

Young (2021)

Zoombombing Your Toddler: User Experience and the Communication of Zoom’s Priva…

Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Zhang et al. (2020)

How Large Information Technology Companies Use Twitter: Arrangement of Corporat…

Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Alaiad et al. (2017)

Patients' Adoption of WSN-Based Smart Home Healthcare Systems: An Integrated Mo…

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Chai et al. (2009)

Internet and Online Information Privacy: An Exploratory Study of Preteens and E…

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Markel (2006)

Safe harbor and privacy protection: a looming issue for IT professionals

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

Show all 11 →

Zappen (2005)

Digital Rhetoric: Toward an Integrated Theory

Technical Communication Quarterly
Perkins et al. (2004)

Multinational Data-Privacy Laws: An Introductionfor IT Managers

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Chociey (1997)

"Who's reading my e-mail?": a study of professionals' e-mail usage and privacy …

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Perugini (1996)

Anytime, anywhere: the social impact of emerging communication technology

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Gurak (1995)

Rhetorical dynamics of corporate communication in cyberspace: the protest over …

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Hitch et al. (1994)

Historical perspectives on technology, ethics, and privacy

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

Also cites 32 works outside this index ↓

10.1177/1461444809342738

↗
10.1016/j.chb.2015.10.033

↗
10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00383.x

↗
10.1016/j.paid.2015.12.051

↗
10.1016/j.chb.2011.09.009

↗
10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.017

↗
10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.022

↗
10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.027

↗
10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.059

↗
10.1007/s10896-011-9360-x

↗
10.1037/h0054346

↗
10.1007/s11423-012-9260-7

↗
10.1108/09593841011087770

↗
10.1177/1527476411415699

↗
10.1016/j.chb.2011.01.012

↗
10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.008

↗
10.1108/14779961211226994

↗
10.1007/s10676-010-9224-8

↗
10.1515/9780748633371-005

↗
10.1509/jmr.10.0355

↗
10.1080/10447318.2010.516719

↗
10.1016/j.cose.2014.10.012

↗
10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.055

↗
10.5210/fm.v15i8.3075

↗
10.1007/s10551-015-2565-9

↗
10.1007/s10676-018-9480-6

↗
10.1177/0263276409347697

↗
10.1177/1745691612442904

↗
10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02126.x

↗
10.1177/1354856512442764

↗
10.1177/0162243915571167

↗
10.3366/dls.2015.0193

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 4 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Power, Freedom, and Privacy on a Discipline-and-Control Facebook, and the Implications for Internet Governance

Abstract

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

Cites in this index (11)

Related Articles