Building Relationships Through Integrated Online Media

Wonsun Shin Nanyang Technological University ; Augustine Pang Nanyang Technological University ; Hyo Jung Kim Nanyang Technological University

Abstract

Many studies have examined organizations’ use of specific types of online media, but few studies have examined how organizations generate dialogues and develop relationships by using multiple online communication platforms. This study takes an integrated approach by examining how top global organizations incorporate brand Web sites, Facebook, and Twitter to cultivate relationships with stakeholders. Its findings suggest that those particular online media are used similarly, that is, more for information dissemination than user engagement and more for one-way than two-way communication. The findings also suggest that the types of products promoted can affect the way that organizations use different online media to develop relationships.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
2015-04-01
DOI
10.1177/1050651914560569
Open Access
OA PDF Green
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication

Cites in this index (7)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Show all 7 →
  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Also cites 37 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1108/13563281111156853
  2. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.05.002
  3. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.12.006
  4. 10.1207/s1532754xjprr0902_01
  5. 10.1016/j.im.2010.06.002
  6. 10.1080/15252019.2011.10722189
  7. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.07.003
  8. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.06.005
  9. 10.2753/JOA0091-3367360103
  10. 10.1016/S0363-8111(00)00029-1
  11. 10.1080/1553118X.2010.489499
  12. 10.1016/S0363-8111(99)80143-X
  13. 10.1108/13632540610646355
  14. 10.1080/10627260802520488
  15. 10.1080/15252019.2011.10722187
  16. 10.4324/9781410604668-10
  17. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.01.005
  18. 10.1177/1080569911423959
  19. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.10.006
  20. 10.1108/03090560510572034
  21. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2008.06.006
  22. 10.1080/15252019.2011.10722191
  23. 10.1108/13563280510630098
  24. 10.1177/0021943610385657
  25. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.08.004
  26. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.02.005
  27. 10.1080/1062726X.2010.504791
  28. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.02.002
  29. 10.1080/13527260802481207
  30. 10.1016/S0363-8111(01)00086-8
  31. 10.2501/S0021849910091452
  32. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.01.006
  33. 10.5840/jcr20113416
    Journal of Communication and Religion  
  34. 10.1108/13563281111141679
  35. 10.1016/S0363-8111(99)00027-2
  36. 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2010.01528.x
  37. 10.1177/0093650210362682
CrossRef global citation count: 59 View in citation network →