Assertions of Expertise in Online Product Reviews

Jo Mackiewicz Auburn University

Abstract

In online consumer reviews on Web sites such as Epinions, laypeople write and post their evaluations of technical products. But how do they get readers to take their opinions seriously? One way that online reviewers establish credibility is to assert expertise. This article describes 10 types of assertions that online reviewers used (along with the three broader categories of these types), explaining the method used to test the types for reliability. This testing revealed that the types are reliable. This study lays the groundwork for understanding how reviewers construct expertise and, therefore, credibility and for gauging readers' perceptions of reviews that contain these assertions.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
2010-01-01
DOI
10.1177/1050651909346929
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (12)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Show all 12 →
  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  6. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  7. Technical Communication Quarterly

Cites in this index (2)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
Also cites 32 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1109/MIS.2007.55
  2. 10.1093/ijl/6.4.253
  3. 10.1177/002194369102800403
  4. 10.1086/267745
  5. 10.1287/mnsc.46.4.563.12061
  6. 10.1177/0170840602235001
  7. 10.1509/jmkr.43.3.345
  8. Coulmas, F. ( 1986). Reported speech: Some general issues. In F. Coulmas (Ed.), Direct and indirect speech (p…
  9. 10.1080/00224545.1973.9922597
  10. 10.1037/0022-3514.36.4.424
  11. 10.1207/s15327663jcp0702_02
  12. 10.1086/209135
  13. 10.1086/209388
  14. 10.1086/208906
  15. 10.1075/swll.5
  16. 10.1177/002194360103800404
  17. 10.1177/002194368902600204
  18. 10.1086/230539
  19. 10.1145/268092.268122
  20. 10.4018/978-1-59904-863-5.ch020
  21. 10.2307/3152028
  22. 10.1086/208756
  23. 10.1080/00913367.1990.10673191
  24. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02547.x
  25. 10.1016/S0278-0984(02)11030-3
  26. 10.1080/1369857031000123948
  27. 10.1207/S15327973RLSI3502_2
  28. 10.1111/1467-6451.00162
  29. 10.1016/j.tourman.2008.04.008
  30. 10.1111/1467-9481.00080
  31. 10.1108/07363760410525678
  32. 10.1300/J238v01n01_09
CrossRef global citation count: 74 View in citation network →