Assertions of Expertise in Online Product Reviews

Jo Mackiewicz Auburn University

Abstract

In online consumer reviews on Web sites such as Epinions, laypeople write and post their evaluations of technical products. But how do they get readers to take their opinions seriously? One way that online reviewers establish credibility is to assert expertise. This article describes 10 types of assertions that online reviewers used (along with the three broader categories of these types), explaining the method used to test the types for reliability. This testing revealed that the types are reliable. This study lays the groundwork for understanding how reviewers construct expertise and, therefore, credibility and for gauging readers' perceptions of reviews that contain these assertions.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
2010-01-01
DOI
10.1177/1050651909346929
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (16)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Show all 16 →
  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
  6. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  7. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  8. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  9. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  10. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  11. Technical Communication Quarterly

References (45) · 2 in this index

  1. About Epinions. (n.d.). Retrieved July 1, 2009, from http://www.epinions.com/about/
  2. 10.1109/MIS.2007.55
  3. 10.1093/ijl/6.4.253
  4. 10.1177/002194369102800403
  5. Bennett, P. ( 1999). Understanding responses to risk: Some basic findings . In P. Bennett, & K. Calman (Eds.)…
Show all 45 →
  1. 10.1086/267745
  2. 10.1287/mnsc.46.4.563.12061
  3. 10.1177/0170840602235001
  4. 10.1509/jmkr.43.3.345
  5. Coulmas, F. ( 1986). Reported speech: Some general issues. In F. Coulmas (Ed.), Direct and indirect speech (p…
  6. 10.1080/00224545.1973.9922597
  7. Technical Communication Quarterly
  8. 10.1037/0022-3514.36.4.424
  9. Earnings on Epinions.com
  10. 10.1207/s15327663jcp0702_02
  11. 10.1086/209135
  12. When management becomes personal: An activity-theoretic analysis of Palm technologies
  13. 10.1086/209388
  14. 10.1086/208906
  15. Communication and persuasion
  16. 10.1075/swll.5
  17. 10.1177/002194360103800404
  18. 10.1177/002194368902600204
  19. 10.1086/230539
  20. Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts
  21. 10.1145/268092.268122
  22. New York Times
  23. 10.4018/978-1-59904-863-5.ch020
  24. 10.2307/3152028
  25. 10.1086/208756
  26. Guide to managerial communication
  27. 10.1080/00913367.1990.10673191
  28. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02547.x
  29. 10.1016/S0278-0984(02)11030-3
  30. 10.1080/1369857031000123948
  31. Time and narrative
  32. 10.1207/S15327973RLSI3502_2
  33. Dynamics in document design: Creating text for readers
  34. Transforming traditional agriculture
  35. 10.1111/1467-6451.00162
  36. 10.1016/j.tourman.2008.04.008
  37. 10.1111/1467-9481.00080
  38. 10.1108/07363760410525678
  39. 10.1300/J238v01n01_09
  40. Journal of Business and Technical Communication