The Naked Truth about the Naked<i>This</i>: Investigating Grammatical Prescriptivism in Technical Communication

Ryan K. Boettger University of North Texas ; Stefanie Wulff University of Florida

Abstract

The decision to follow the demonstrative this with a noun phrase is important to students’ writing development. Previous research has emphasized when students should not attend this rather than studying why students make the choice. Using a corpus-linguistic approach, we investigated 1,999 instances of (un)attended this in student technical and academic writing. High shares of unattended this were found in both text types as well as in original and revised drafts.

Journal
Technical Communication Quarterly
Published
2014-04-01
DOI
10.1080/10572252.2013.803919
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (5)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Written Communication
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication

Cites in this index (10)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Research in the Teaching of English
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
Show all 10 →
  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. College Composition and Communication
  5. Written Communication
Also cites 13 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.2307/455450
  2. 10.1109/TPC.2006.880753
  3. 10.0.3.249/S0267190502000041
  4. 10.1075/ijcl.9.1.06gri
  5. 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.02.002
  6. 10.1109/47.749369
  7. 10.2307/357901
  8. 10.1109/TPC.2006.880750
  9. 10.17239/jowr-2010.02.02.2
    Journal of Writing Research  
  10. 10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste
  11. Wulff , S. & Gries , S. Th. ( 2011 ). Corpus-driven methods for assessing accuracy in learner production. In …
  12. 10.3366/E1749503209000276
  13. 10.1515/cllt-2012-0006
CrossRef global citation count: 13 View in citation network →