Abstract

Experts on style agree that writers frequently have trouble using the unattended anaphoric this clearly. Few, however, have proposed explicit guidelines for sorting appropriate from inappropriate uses. This article examines the limitations of a recent classification proposed by Moskovit (1983), and then suggests an alternate classification relying on concepts from functional grammar. In particular, Moskovit's distinction between demarcational, syntactic, and semantic reference is found not to predict actual readers' judgments. In its place, the authors suggest a classification based on the functional notions of topic and focus. The unattended this is shown to be English's economical routine for moving the focus of a discourse from nominal topics to clausal predications relating those topics. Before deciding to employ this routine, however, writers are warned to evaluate its consequences on clarity and rhetoric.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
1985-04-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088385002002002
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Written Communication
  3. Written Communication

References (12) · 1 in this index

  1. 10.1080/00335638409383685
  2. Syntax and semantics
  3. Theoretical issues in natural language processing-2
  4. Cohesion in English
  5. Hodgart, M. (1969). Satire (p. 193). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Show all 12 →
  1. Harbrace college handbook
  2. Playboy
  3. Dissertation Abstracts International
  4. 10.2307/357901
  5. Understanding written language
  6. Towards a computational theory of definite anaphora comprehension in English discourse
  7. College Composition and Communication