Technical Communication Quarterly Oct 2024

“I Feel Like I’m in a Box”: Contrasting Virtual Reality “Imaginaries” in the Context of Academic Innovation Labs

Brent Lucia ; Matthew A. Vetter Indiana University of Pennsylvania ; David A. Solberg

Abstract

ABSTRACTAs immersive technology grows in popularity, universities are developing academic innovation labs (AIL) that often introduce students to virtual reality (VR) and other emerging cross reality applications. Although these labs help educate students on emerging technology, a more critical eye is needed to examine user experience (UX). This article reports on a qualitative, multimethod study that employed a talk-aloud UX protocol to gather data on VR users' experience at the University of Connecticut's OPIM Research Lab. To fully define and contrast this data, we juxtapose these individual narratives with rhetorical analysis of marketing discourse, as presented by VR platform HTC Vive, Google's VR application Tilt Brush, and the Research Lab's promotional material. Based on our findings, we assert that sociotechnical imaginaries as constructed by promotional material often reduce the complexities of immersion in user experience. Such marketing rhetoric creates "top-down" imaginaries that contrast with "bottom-up" imaginaries generated in user experience, reinforcing the complex and fluid definitions of immersion. The resulting study has practical implications for stakeholders across higher education, especially in the context of innovation labs, as well as for technical and professional communication educators and practitioners.KEYWORDS: Immersive technologyinnovation labsvirtual realityimmersionuser experienceemerging technologyfuture imaginariessociotechnical imaginaries Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsBrent LuciaBrent Lucia is an Assistant Professor In-Residence at the University of Connecticut School of Business. He has a PhD in Composition and Applied Linguistics from Indiana University of Pennsylvania. His current research explores the rhetorics of technology and its relationship to the production of space. His recent scholarship can be found in Rhetoric Review, Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, and Enculturation.Matthew A. VetterMatthew A. Vetter is an Associate Professor of English and affiliate faculty in the Composition and Applied Linguistics PhD program at Indiana University of Pennsylvania. His research, which asks questions related to technology, rhetoric, and writing, has been published widely in venues such as Social Media and Society, Rhetoric Review, Studies in Higher Education, and Computers and Composition. His co-authored book, Wikipedia and the Representation of Reality, was published by Routledge in 2021.David A. SolbergDavid A. Solberg is a teaching assistant at the Holy Family Institute in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. He received his MA degree in TESOL (Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages) from Indiana University of Pennsylvania. His master's thesis was entitled The Use of Parallelism in Poetry Writing for the Acquisition of English Grammar (available from ProQuest).

Journal
Technical Communication Quarterly
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
10.1080/10572252.2023.2245442
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
rhetorical criticism discourse analysis creative writing graduate education teacher development professional writing digital rhetoric social media grammar and mechanics editorial matter
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Jiang et al. (2024)
    From Hype to Practice: Reinterpreting the Writing Process Through Technical Wri…
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Tham (2024)
    Researching With Virtual Reality: Exploring the Methodological Affordances of V…
    IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

References (61) · 10 in this index

  1. St.Amant (2021)
    Cognition, Care, and Usability: Applying Cognitive Concepts to User Experience …
    Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. 10.1089/cpb.2004.7.734
     ↗
  3. Berkhout F. (2004)
    Socio-technological regimes and transition contexts
    System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability: Theory, Evidence and Policy
  4. 10.1109/TVCG.2018.2794658
     ↗
  5. 10.4324/9781315232713
     ↗
Show all 61 →
  1. Calbay R. F. (2019)
    Co-defining technology in user-to-user online support: The case of Virtual Reality (VR) h…
    Journal of Content, Community & Communication
  2. Chan M. A. (2018)
    Analysing movement, the body and immersion in virtual reality
    Refractory: A Journal of Entertainment Media
  3. Crunchbase. (n.d.) Skillman and Hackett: Crunchbase company profile and funding. Retrieved January 10 2022 fr…
  4. 10.1177/14614448221119785
     ↗
  5. 10.1080/22041451.2015.1047941
     ↗
  6. 10.1145/3328778.3366825
     ↗
  7. 10.1177/1461444821993120
     ↗
  8. 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8
     ↗
  9. 10.7551/mitpress/11836.001.0001
     ↗
  10. 10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.008
     ↗
  11. Hatter et al. (2013)
    Intentional Bias: An Empirical Study of Interpellative User Experiences on Univ…
    Computers and Composition
  12. 10.1162/105474601300343621
     ↗
  13. Introducing Meta: A Social Technology Company. (2021 October 28). Retrieved December 7 2021 from https://abou…
  14. 10.1007/s11024-009-9124-4
     ↗
  15. 10.1162/PRES_a_00124
     ↗
  16. Kimball (2017)
    The Golden Age of Technical Communication
    Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  17. Kimball (2017)
    Tactical Technical Communication
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  18. Kitalong (2000)
    “You Will”: Technology, Magic, and the Cultural Contexts of Technical Communication
    Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  19. Kitalong et al. (2009)
    Beyond the Screen: Narrative Mapping as a Tool for Evaluating a Mixed-Reality S…
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  20. Knievel (2006)
    Technology Artifacts, Instrumentalism, and the Humanist Manifestos: Toward an I…
    Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  21. 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00302.x
     ↗
  22. 10.1080/1369118X.2014.989252
     ↗
  23. 10.1177/1461444820924623
     ↗
  24. 10.37716/HBAB.2020010105
     ↗
  25. 10.1177/1461444820929321
     ↗
  26. McCormick R. (2014 28 February). Valve’s virtual reality headset might be better than the Oculus Rift. The Ve…
  27. McCormick R. (2015 23 February). Valve showing off new virtual reality hardware and updated Steam controller …
  28. 10.1145/3411764.3445253
     ↗
  29. Miles (2009)
    Reconceptualizing Analysis and Invention in a Post-Technê Classroom: A Comparat…
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  30. Pedersen I. (2013)
    Ready to wear: A rhetoric of wearable computers and reality-shifting media
  31. Robertson A. (2016 5 April). HTC Vive review: Great ideas unfinished execution. The Verge. https://www.thever…
  32. 10.1145/3546607.3546611
     ↗
  33. Saldaña J. (2009)
    The coding manual for qualitative researchers
  34. Salisbury A. D. & Crews T. (2019). How higher ed. can change faster. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehigh…
  35. 10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.012
     ↗
  36. 10.1080/1369118X.2017.1411519
     ↗
  37. 10.1177/0306312720944753
     ↗
  38. Slater M. (2003)
    Presence 2003: The 6thAnnual International Workshop on Presence
  39. 10.1162/105474600566925
     ↗
  40. 10.1162/pres.1997.6.6.603
     ↗
  41. Smith J. W. (2017)
    Proceedings of the Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference (…
  42. Sun H. (2017)
    Localizing User Experience
    Technical Communication
  43. Tham J. C. K. (2018)
    Interactivity in an age of immersive media: Seven dimensions for wearable technology, int…
    Technical Communication
  44. 10.4324/9781003036760
     ↗
  45. Tham et al. (2018)
    Understanding Virtual Reality: Presence, Embodiment, and Professional Practice
    IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  46. Tham et al. (2018)
    Guest Editors’ Introduction: Immersive Technologies and Writing Pedagogy
    Computers and Composition
  47. Tilt Brush by Google. Retrieved February 5 2021 from https://www.tiltbrush.com/. Archived at https://web.arch…
  48. Tonurist P. Kattel R. & Lember V. (2015). Discovering innovation labs in the public sector. The Other Canon F…
  49. UConn School of Business. (2017 January 26). OPIM Innovate [Video file]. Retrieved January 26 2017 from https…
  50. Ungerleider N. (2016). Google’s Tilt Brush is the first great VR app. Fast Company. April 5 2016. Retrieved M…
  51. 10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00334-7
     ↗
  52. Van Someren M. W. (1994)
    The think-aloud method: A practical guide to modeling cognitive processes
  53. Vive | Discover Virtual Reality Beyond Imagination. (2016). Vive.com. https://web.archive.org/web/20160921023…
  54. 10.1155/2011/282345
     ↗
  55. 10.1016/j.chb.2007.11.002
     ↗
  56. 10.1162/105474698565686
     ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 7 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Pedagogy Jan 2022
    Contributors ↗
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism genre theory discourse analysis african american rhetorics decolonial rhetorics first-year composition writing pedagogy basic writing writing across the curriculum graduate education teacher development argument collaborative writing transfer assessment portfolios writing program administration writing centers peer tutoring technical communication professional writing archival research digital rhetoric social media grammar and mechanics literacy studies race and writing gender and writing disability studies public rhetoric community literacy literary studies editorial matter
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly Oct 2024
    Editors’ Use of Comprehensive Style Guides: The Case of Singular They ↗
    Jo Mackiewicz; Shaya Kraut; Allison Durazzi
    rhetorical criticism discourse analysis first-year composition writing pedagogy graduate education teacher development writing centers technical communication professional writing digital rhetoric multilingual writers grammar and mechanics literacy studies race and writing public rhetoric editorial matter
  3. Pedagogy Apr 2025
    Contributors ↗
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism african american rhetorics cultural rhetorics first-year composition writing pedagogy basic writing graduate education two-year college teacher development writing centers technical communication professional writing labor and working conditions digital rhetoric multimodality social media literacy studies race and writing gender and writing community literacy literary studies editorial matter
  4. Pedagogy Apr 2023
    Contributors ↗
    rhetorical criticism first-year composition writing pedagogy creative writing graduate education two-year college service learning teacher development writing centers technical communication professional writing labor and working conditions digital rhetoric multimodality race and writing gender and writing literary studies editorial matter
  5. Pedagogy Oct 2025
    Contributors ↗
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism genre theory cultural rhetorics first-year composition writing pedagogy advanced composition creative writing writing across the curriculum graduate education two-year college service learning teacher development technical communication professional writing labor and working conditions archival research multimodality artificial intelligence literacy studies race and writing gender and writing disability studies literary studies editorial matter