Gender Effects in Student Technical and Scientific Writing—A Corpus-Based Study

Ryan K. Boettger University of North Texas ; Stefanie Wulff University of Florida

Abstract

Background: This study adopted a corpus-linguistics approach to investigate the gender effects in students' technical and scientific writing. Specifically, we analyzed whether gender influenced how males and females used adverbs (e.g., very, really, and definitely) and passive voice (e.g., the article was published in the journal). The overuse of both adverbs and passive voice has been associated with poor writing clarity and concision. Literature review: Previous research works on gender effects in language have been mixed. Since these are all the essential elements of effective technical communication, teachers need to know what gender effects might exist. Research questions are as follows: 1. Does gender influence the student writers' use of adverbs? 2. Does gender influence the student writers' use of passive voice? Methodology: The sample included 87 writers (46 females and 41 males) who contributed to a 757,533-word corpus. Researchers analyzed 12,111 instances of adverbs and 4,732 instances of passive voice within a variety of technical texts. Results/discussion: Female writers used significantly more adverbs as well as more additive/restrictive, degree, and stance adverbs than expected. Male writers used more linking and manner adverbs than expected. Female writers also used significantly more passives, particularly passive verbs associated with reporting findings and interpretation. In contrast, male writers associated with passive verbs used to describe methods and analyses. Overall, the results suggested that females and males used the same style markers to fulfill different rhetorical functions.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2019-09-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2019.2920029
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  3. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

References (65) · 12 in this index

  1. Technical Communication A Reader-Centered Approach
  2. Handbook of Technical Writing
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Discourses of difference? Examining gender differences in linguistic characteristics of writing
    Journal of Cancer Education
Show all 65 →
  1. 10.1080/01425690301891
  2. Technical Communication
  3. Real Grammar A Corpus-based Approach to English
  4. Technical Communication
  5. 10.2307/375964
  6. 10.1515/stap-2017-0004
  7. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  8. Disciplinary Discourses Social Interactions in Academic Writing
  9. Linking adverbials in research articles across eight disciplines
    Ibérica
  10. Evaluation and teachers’ perceptions of gender in sixth-grade student writing
    Research in the Teach of Engl
  11. Gender and expressions of dissatisfaction: A study of complaining in mixed-gendered stude…
    Women and Language
  12. 10.4324/9780203486375
  13. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01001.x
  14. Written Communication
  15. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  16. 10.1093/hcr/27.1.121
  17. 10.1080/01638530802073712
  18. 10.1126/science.7604277
  19. Male/female Language With a Comprehensive Bibliography
  20. 10.1002/pits.21733
  21. 10.1016/j.paid.2016.08.016
  22. Composing in the style of Mozart: An exploration of the “struggling boy writer&#x2…
    The English Teacher
  23. 10.4324/9781315045115
  24. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English
  25. 10.1075/ijcl.9.1.06gri
  26. Research in the Teaching of English
  27. 10.1598/JAAL.49.3.1
  28. 10.1080/08934219509367614
  29. 10.1177/0261927X8652001
  30. 10.1017/S0047404500005030
  31. Coll.analysis 3.2. A program for R for Windows 2.x
  32. 10.1515/CLLT.2006.012
  33. 10.1075/z.136.17wul
  34. 10.1007/s10936-014-9295-5
  35. 10.1017/S0047404500006680
  36. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English
  37. He wrote, she wrote: Gender similarities and differences in written business communication
    J Bus Diversity
  38. 10.1348/014466601164812
  39. 10.1515/text.2003.014
  40. 10.1017/CBO9780511804489
  41. 10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.857
  42. 10.1016/0271-5309(94)90007-8
  43. 10.1177/0261927X00019004001
  44. 10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581
  45. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  46. Technical Communication Quarterly
  47. Communication Design Quarterly
  48. 10.1109/IPCC.2017.8013953
  49. 10.1177/002194368602300205
  50. Journal of Writing Research
  51. Developing AntConc for a new generation of corpus linguists
    Proc Corpus Linguistics Conf
  52. 10.1177/002194368802500402
  53. 10.1017/S0267190502000041
  54. Technical Communication Today
  55. The Technical Writing Project
  56. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  57. 10.1016/S0898-5898(96)90025-X
  58. Object-centered—How engineering writing embodies objects: A study of four engineer…
    Tech Commun
  59. Technical Editing
  60. Journal of Business and Technical Communication