A Corpus-Assisted Critical Discourse Analysis of News Construction of the Flint Water Crisis

Yeqing Kong University of North Carolina Wilmington

Abstract

<bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Background:</b> News media play a critical role in communicating risks and shaping public perceptions of social issues. Covering a multilayered disaster that grew from a local story to a national one, the ways that news media at different levels construct the Flint water crisis have not been previously explored. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Literature review:</b> Despite the well-established role of journalism as a government watchdog, news media do not neutrally mirror every social event. Instead, news reporting, highly mediated by language, is filled with political interests, values, and attitudes. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Research questions:</b> 1. How did local/regional and national newspapers construct the Flint water crisis? 2. Are there any similarities and/or differences in local/regional and national news construction of the Flint water crisis? 3. What are the practical implications for media coverage of risks, emergencies, or crises? 4. What are the methodological implications of this study for professional communication research? <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Methodology:</b> This study integrates corpus linguistics and critical discourse analysis to analyze 1858 news reports about the Flint water crisis published between 2014 and 2018. I use keywords as a core analytical technique to compare the local/regional and national news coverage. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Results:</b> The results show that both local and national news reports overemphasized government activities while downplaying the unofficial voices of Flint residents and community activists. In addition, national newspapers were more likely than local newspapers to use racial cues in describing the Flint community and to associate the crisis with other social problems. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Conclusions:</b> This study suggests that news media should provide wide coverage of the affected community's efforts in risk/crisis communication rather than reproducing official messages. News representations should be cautious of strengthening stereotypes or forming negative conceptual associations of traditionally disenfranchised communities.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2022-12-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2022.3200286
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

Cites in this index (3)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Also cites 35 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1093/applin/ams048
  2. 10.2217/fvl-2018-0022
  3. 10.20999/nam.2017.a001
  4. Metaphors, motifs and similes across discourse types: Corpus-assisted discourse studies (…
    Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy  
  5. 10.1080/13549839.2020.1747415
  6. 10.1177/0957926508088962
  7. Critical discourse analysis
    The Handbook of Discourse Analysis  
  8. 10.1017/CBO9781139524773
  9. 10.1093/applin/15.2.201
  10. 10.1002/9780470758427
  11. 10.1177/1077699012448873
  12. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00341.x
  13. 10.1080/13691830120103912
  14. 10.1177/1750481314568548
  15. 10.5040/9781350933996
  16. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190653934.001.0001
  17. 10.1177/0957926513516041
  18. 10.1080/1461670X.2016.1150193
  19. 10.1177/002234336500200104
  20. 10.1007/s12111-003-1006-5
  21. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00020.x
  22. 10.1016/j.dcm.2015.11.004
  23. 10.1177/107769900508200412
  24. 10.1177/073953290903000102
  25. 10.1080/1461670X.2012.726499
  26. 10.4324/9780203931653
  27. 10.1177/107769900207900405
  28. 10.1057/9781137431738_14
  29. 10.1080/00909880601065664
  30. 10.1080/10410236.2018.1536949
  31. 10.1080/17512786.2015.1121786
  32. 10.3109/09638237.2016.1167849
  33. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113403
  34. 10.1177/0075424204269894
  35. 10.1016/S0346-251X(97)00011-0