Presenting and Making Relevant: Analyzing Teaching Assistant Perceptions of Writing in Statistics Using Semantic Frames

Ben Markey Carnegie Mellon University

Abstract

<italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><b>Background:</b></i> Instructors in STEM fields help prepare students to be effective communicators in the workplace, partially through instruction of professional genres such as client-facing reports. At the same time, class sizes are increasing, and writing assessment often falls to teaching assistants (TAs). <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><b>Literature review:</b></i> Research suggests that TAs possess a maturing but inchoate sense of writing in their field, which potentially complicates their ability to deliver quality feedback. This study uses frame semantics, a form of discourse analysis, to probe TAs for their beliefs about writing in statistics. <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><b>Research questions:</b></i> 1. When asked to describe the function and role of writing in statistics, what lexical verbs do TA informants use? 2. What frames are invoked by those verbs? 3. How do the invoked semantic frames position writing in relation to disciplinary and professional work in the field? <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><b>Research methodology:</b></i> This study interviewed three TAs from an introductory statistics course about their perceptions of writing in statistics. Frame semantics was used to analyze TA responses. <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><b>Results:</b></i> Less experienced TAs tended to perceive writing as a means of presentation, which entailed a weak sense of the role of rhetoric in technical communication and a muddied understanding of writing assessment. The more advanced TA perceived writing as a means of contextualizing statistical evidence for particular audiences. <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><b>Conclusion:</b></i> Due to their maturing perceptions of writing in their disciplines, TAs might not possess the ability to deliver quality formative feedback. One means of support for these TAs may be opportunities to discuss assessment decisions with one another, thereby calibrating against available expectations and rubrics.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2025-06-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2025.3561609
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (27)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. Journal of Writing Research
  3. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  4. Across the Disciplines
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Show all 27 →
  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Across the Disciplines
  5. Journal of Writing Analytics
  6. Assessing Writing
  7. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  8. Across the Disciplines
  9. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  10. Across the Disciplines
  11. Written Communication
  12. Across the Disciplines
  13. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  14. Assessing Writing
  15. Technical Communication Quarterly
  16. College Composition and Communication
  17. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  18. Research in the Teaching of English
  19. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  20. Written Communication
  21. College Composition and Communication
  22. Written Communication
Also cites 24 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1093/oso/9780198862741.001.0001
  2. 10.4324/9781410601155
  3. 10.1002/sce.21454
  4. 10.1080/0309877x.2018.1499883
  5. 10.2979/teachlearninqu.2.2.25
  6. 10.7551/mitpress/7702.001.0001
  7. 10.1007/s11948-011-9261-7
  8. 10.1080/10691898.2019.1696257
  9. 10.1111/test.12194
  10. 10.19030/tlc.v1i7.1968
  11. 10.1080/03043790600911803
  12. 10.1086/681964
  13. 10.4324/9781410604262-21
  14. 10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00072
  15. 10.1088/1361-6404/ab9890
  16. 10.1187/cbe.18-07-0137
  17. 10.1187/cbe.17-04-0070
  18. 10.1139/cjp-2017-0030
  19. 10.1103/physrevphyseducres.13.010120
  20. 10.1016/b0-08-044854-2/00424-7
  21. 10.1075/bct.58.05uch
  22. 10.4324/9780203811269
  23. 10.1002/berj.3082
  24. 10.1080/02602938.2019.1570483