Written Communication Apr 2011

Argumentation Across the Curriculum

Christopher R. Wolfe Miami University

Abstract

This study explores how different kinds of arguments are situated in academic contexts and provides an analysis of undergraduate writing assignments. Assignments were collected from the schools of business, education, engineering, fine arts, and interdisciplinary studies as well as the humanities, natural sciences, and social sciences in the College of Arts and Science. A total of 265 undergraduate writing assignments from 71 courses were analyzed. Assignments were reliably categorized into these major categories of argumentative writing: explicitly thesis-driven assignments, text analysis, empirical arguments, decision-based arguments, proposals, short answer arguments, and compound arguments. A majority of writing assignments (59%) required argumentation. All engineering writing assignments required argumentation, as did 90% in fine arts, 80% of interdisciplinary assignments, 72% of social science assignments, 60% of education assignments, 53% in natural science, 47% in the humanities, and 46% in business. Argumentation is valued across the curriculum, yet different academic contexts require different forms of argumentation.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2011-04-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088311399236
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
discourse analysis writing pedagogy graduate education argument
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (9)

  1. Markey (2025)
    Presenting and Making Relevant: Analyzing Teaching Assistant Perceptions of Wri…
    IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. Ihara et al. (2020)
    Feature: Writing on the Periphery: The Writing Landscape of a Two-Year College
    Teaching English in the Two-Year College
  3. Zabihi et al. (2020)
    Are Two Voices Better Than One? Comparing Aspects of Text Quality and Authorial…
    Written Communication
  4. Yoon et al. (2020)
    Quantifying Disciplinary Voices: An Automated Approach to Interactional Metadis…
    Written Communication
  5. Wolfe et al. (2018)
    Most Any Reason Is Better Than None: Consequences of Implausible Reasons and Wa…
    Written Communication
Show all 9 →
  1. Imbrenda (2018)
    “No Facts Equals Unconvincing”: Fact and Opinion as Conceptual Tools in High Sc…
    Written Communication
  2. Abdollahzadeh et al. (2017)
    Argumentative Writing Behavior of Graduate EFL Learners
    Argumentation
  3. Kuhn et al. (2016)
    Tracing the Development of Argumentive Writing in a Discourse-Rich Context
    Written Communication
  4. Wolfe (2012)
    Individual Differences in the “Myside Bias” in Reasoning and Written Argumentation
    Written Communication

References (39) · 6 in this index

  1. ACT. (2010)
    National Ranks for ACT Scores
  2. Anderson, P. (2010)
    Getting more without assigning more: Implications of the NSSE study for Miami faculty and…
  3. Andrews, R. (2010)
    Argumentation in higher education: Improving practice through theory and research
  4. Aristotle. (1991)
    On rhetoric: A theory of civic discourse
  5. 10.1080/00221546.2009.11779016
     ↗
Show all 39 →
  1. 10.1080/01638530701739207
     ↗
  2. 10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00002-0
     ↗
  3. 10.17011/ht/urn.20105241909
     ↗
  4. College Board. (2010)
    SAT Percentile Ranks, 2009 College-Bound Seniors
  5. 10.1080/09500690801992870
     ↗
  6. 10.1007/s10648-007-9056-1
     ↗
  7. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A
     ↗
  8. 10.1002/sce.20012
     ↗
  9. Fahnestock, J. (2003)
    A rhetoric of argument: Brief
  10. FAHNESTOCK et al. (1988)
    The Stases in Scientific and Literary Argument
    Written Communication
  11. 10.1177/0170840607079536
     ↗
  12. Giltrow, J. ( 2000). "Argument" as a term in student talk about writing . In S. Mitchell & R. Andrews (Eds.),…
  13. 10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6<757::AID-SCE5>3.0.CO;2-F
     ↗
  14. 10.1016/j.cogdev.2008.09.006
     ↗
  15. 10.3200/JEXE.77.4.339-366
     ↗
  16. 10.1177/1750481308091907
     ↗
  17. Miami University Assessment. (2010)
    Did you know? Quick facts about the Oxford Campus Class of 2011
  18. 10.1109/32.142872
     ↗
  19. Regli, W.C., Hu, X., Atwood, M. & Sun, W. ( 2000). Engineering with Computers, 16, 209-235.
     ↗
  20. 10.1016/j.lindif.2008.11.001
     ↗
  21. 10.1207/S15327809JLS1202_3
     ↗
  22. STOCKTON (1995)
    Writing in History: Narrating the Subject of Time
    Written Communication
  23. Toulmin, S.E. (1958)
    The uses of argument
  24. 10.1023/A:1015100631027
     ↗
  25. Voss (2005)
    Toulmin’s Model and the Solving of Ill-Structured Problems
    Argumentation
  26. Voss et al. (1993)
    On the processing of arguments
    Argumentation
  27. 10.1016/S0883-0355(97)89733-9
     ↗
  28. 10.1037/0022-0663.91.2.301
     ↗
  29. Wilder (2005)
    “The Rhetoric of Literary Criticism” Revisited: Mistaken Critics, Complex Conte…
    Written Communication
  30. Wolfe, C.R.
    44th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society
  31. 10.1080/13546780701527674
     ↗
  32. Wolfe et al. (2009)
    Argumentation Schema and the Myside Bias in Written Argumentation
    Written Communication
  33. Wolfe, C.R. (2003)
    Issues in Integrative Studies
  34. Wolfe, C.R. (2003)
    Peer Review
CrossRef global citation count: 73 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Pedagogy Jan 2024
    The Radical Role of Student Writing in Composition ↗
    Jessica Masterson
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism genre theory discourse analysis cultural rhetorics first-year composition writing pedagogy graduate education teacher development argument collaborative writing professional writing grammar and mechanics literacy studies race and writing gender and writing
  2. Pedagogy Jan 2022
    Contributors ↗
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism genre theory discourse analysis african american rhetorics decolonial rhetorics first-year composition writing pedagogy basic writing writing across the curriculum graduate education teacher development argument collaborative writing transfer assessment portfolios writing program administration writing centers peer tutoring technical communication professional writing archival research digital rhetoric social media grammar and mechanics literacy studies race and writing gender and writing disability studies public rhetoric community literacy literary studies editorial matter
  3. Journal of Academic Writing Dec 2020
    Supporting Academic Writing and Publication Practice: PhD Students in Engineering and their Supervisors ↗
    Alena Kasparkova; Kamila Etchegoyen Rosolová
    rhetorical criticism genre theory discourse analysis writing pedagogy graduate education teacher development argument professional writing digital rhetoric
  4. Rhetoric Review Mar 2009
    Rogerian Principles and the Writing Classroom: A History of Intention and (Mis)Interpretation ↗
    Julie Kearney
    classical rhetoric rhetorical criticism composition theory discourse analysis writing pedagogy graduate education revision argument disability studies public rhetoric
  5. College Composition and Communication Dec 2002
    Writing/Teaching: Essays toward a Rhetoric of Pedagogy ↗
    Toby Fulwiler; Paul Kameen
    rhetorical criticism discourse analysis writing pedagogy graduate education teacher development argument