Tracing the Development of Argumentive Writing in a Discourse-Rich Context — Rhetoric & Composition

Written Communication Jan 2016

Tracing the Development of Argumentive Writing in a Discourse-Rich Context

Deanna Kuhn Columbia University ; Laura Hemberger Columbia University ; Valerie Khait Columbia University

Abstract

In most assessments of students’ argumentive writing and in most research on the topic, students write on topics for which they have no specific prior preparation. We examined development in the argumentive writing urban middle school students did as part of a two-year dialogic-based intervention in which students engaged deeply with a series of topics and participated in various kinds of electronic and verbal dialogic activities related to the topic. Students’ achievements exceeded those typical of the extemporaneous expository writing of middle school students. The gradual developments observed over time included ones in (a) addressing and seeking to weaken the opposing position, (b) identifying weaknesses in a favored position and strengths in an opposing one, (c) connecting and integrating opposing arguments, and (d) using evidence to weaken as well as support claims. In addition to identifying a trajectory of what develops in the development of argumentive writing, these analyses support the claim of dialogic argumentation as a productive bridge to individual argumentive writing and highlight the contribution of deep engagement with the topic in enhancing writing.

Journal: Written Communication
Published: 2016-01-01
DOI: 10.1177/0741088315617157
Open Access: Closed
Topics: multilingual writers argument

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (6)

Bodger (2025)

Gateways to a Different World of Meaning: Expanding Theme Use in Primary-Aged C…

Written Communication
Steiss et al. (2024)

U.S. Secondary Students’ Source-Based Argument Writing in History

Written Communication
Ferretti (2023)

When the Truth Doesn’t Seem to Matter: The Affordances of Disciplinary Argument…

Written Communication
Zabihi et al. (2020)

Are Two Voices Better Than One? Comparing Aspects of Text Quality and Authorial…

Written Communication
Imbrenda (2018)

“No Facts Equals Unconvincing”: Fact and Opinion as Conceptual Tools in High Sc…

Written Communication

Show all 6 →

Geisler (2018)

Coding for Language Complexity: The Interplay Among Methodological Commitments,…

Written Communication

Cites in this index (9)

Felton et al. (2015)

Arguing to Agree

Written Communication
O’Hallaron (2014)

Supporting Fifth-Grade ELLs’ Argumentative Writing Development

Written Communication
Olson et al. (2014)

The Quotation Theory of Writing

Written Communication
VanDerHeide et al. (2013)

Instructional Chains as a Method for Examining the Teaching and Learning of Arg…

Written Communication
Paz et al. (2012)

Adolescents’ Disciplinary Use of Evidence, Argumentative Strategies, and Organi…

Written Communication

Show all 9 →

Wolfe (2012)

Individual Differences in the “Myside Bias” in Reasoning and Written Argumentation

Written Communication
Wolfe (2011)

Argumentation Across the Curriculum

Written Communication
Butler et al. (2011)

Investigating Instruction for Improving Revision of Argumentative Essays

Written Communication
Wolfe et al. (2009)

Argumentation Schema and the Myside Bias in Written Argumentation

Written Communication

Also cites 39 works outside this index ↓

10.7208/chicago/9780226161822.001.0001

↗
10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.626

↗
10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01017.x

↗
10.1002/sce.20402

↗
10.1080/15248372.2012.725187

↗
10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A

↗
10.1002/tea.21076

↗
10.1037/a0014702

↗
10.2307/356600

↗
10.1080/07370008.2012.689383

↗
10.1037/a0029185

↗
10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445

↗
10.1163/9789004368811_003

↗
10.1002/sce.21152

↗
10.1017/CBO9780511571350

↗
10.1177/0956797611402512

↗
10.1080/23735082.2015.994254

↗
10.1080/07370008.2013.830618

↗
10.3200/JEXE.77.4.339-366

↗
10.3102/0034654314558490

↗
10.1016/j.tsc.2010.08.002

↗
10.1207/S15326985EP3501_3

↗
McNeill K. (2010)

10.1002/sce.20364

Science Education ↗
10.1017/S0140525X10000968

↗
10.1007/s11145-007-9067-9

↗
Newell G. E. (2011)

10.1598/RRQ.46.3.4

Reading Research Quarterly ↗
10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.549

↗
10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.157

↗
10.3200/JEXE.76.1.59-92

↗
10.1207/S15326950DP3202&3_04

↗
10.1002/sce.20306

↗
10.1017/CBO9781139519526.025

↗
10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734689.013.0022

↗
10.1080/13546780600780796

↗
10.1037/a0029870

↗
10.1007/BF00128147

↗
10.17239/jowr-2015.07.01.02

↗
10.17239/jowr-2015.07.01.03

↗
10.1080/13546780701527674

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 74 View in citation network →