Tracing the Development of Argumentive Writing in a Discourse-Rich Context

Deanna Kuhn Columbia University ; Laura Hemberger Columbia University ; Valerie Khait Columbia University

Abstract

In most assessments of students’ argumentive writing and in most research on the topic, students write on topics for which they have no specific prior preparation. We examined development in the argumentive writing urban middle school students did as part of a two-year dialogic-based intervention in which students engaged deeply with a series of topics and participated in various kinds of electronic and verbal dialogic activities related to the topic. Students’ achievements exceeded those typical of the extemporaneous expository writing of middle school students. The gradual developments observed over time included ones in (a) addressing and seeking to weaken the opposing position, (b) identifying weaknesses in a favored position and strengths in an opposing one, (c) connecting and integrating opposing arguments, and (d) using evidence to weaken as well as support claims. In addition to identifying a trajectory of what develops in the development of argumentive writing, these analyses support the claim of dialogic argumentation as a productive bridge to individual argumentive writing and highlight the contribution of deep engagement with the topic in enhancing writing.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2016-01-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088315617157
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cites in this index (9)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Written Communication
  5. Written Communication
Show all 9 →
  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Written Communication
Also cites 39 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.7208/chicago/9780226161822.001.0001
  2. 10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.626
  3. 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01017.x
  4. 10.1002/sce.20402
  5. 10.1080/15248372.2012.725187
  6. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A
  7. 10.1002/tea.21076
  8. 10.1037/a0014702
  9. 10.2307/356600
  10. 10.1080/07370008.2012.689383
  11. 10.1037/a0029185
  12. 10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445
  13. 10.1163/9789004368811_003
  14. 10.1002/sce.21152
  15. 10.1017/CBO9780511571350
  16. 10.1177/0956797611402512
  17. 10.1080/23735082.2015.994254
  18. 10.1080/07370008.2013.830618
  19. 10.3200/JEXE.77.4.339-366
  20. 10.3102/0034654314558490
  21. 10.1016/j.tsc.2010.08.002
  22. 10.1207/S15326985EP3501_3
  23. 10.1002/sce.20364
    Science Education  
  24. 10.1017/S0140525X10000968
  25. 10.1007/s11145-007-9067-9
  26. 10.1598/RRQ.46.3.4
    Reading Research Quarterly  
  27. 10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.549
  28. 10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.157
  29. 10.3200/JEXE.76.1.59-92
  30. 10.1207/S15326950DP3202&3_04
  31. 10.1002/sce.20306
  32. 10.1017/CBO9781139519526.025
  33. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734689.013.0022
  34. 10.1080/13546780600780796
  35. 10.1037/a0029870
  36. 10.1007/BF00128147
  37. 10.17239/jowr-2015.07.01.02
  38. 10.17239/jowr-2015.07.01.03
  39. 10.1080/13546780701527674
CrossRef global citation count: 74 View in citation network →