Adolescents’ Disciplinary Use of Evidence, Argumentative Strategies, and Organizational Structure in Writing About Historical Controversies

Written Communication Oct 2012

Adolescents’ Disciplinary Use of Evidence, Argumentative Strategies, and Organizational Structure in Writing About Historical Controversies

Susan De La Paz University of Maryland, College Park ; Ralph Ferretti ; Daniel Wissinger ; Laura Yee ; Charles MacArthur

Abstract

This study considers how adolescents compose historical arguments, and it identifies theoretically grounded predictors of the quality of their essays. Using data from a larger study on the effects of a federally funded Teaching American History grant on student learning, we analyzed students’ written responses to document-based questions at the 8th grade ( n = 44) and the 11th ( n = 47). We report how students use evidence (a hallmark of historical thinking), how students structure their historical arguments, and what kinds of argumentative strategies they use when writing about historical controversies. In general, better writers cite more evidence in their arguments than weaker writers, and older students demonstrate how to situate evidence in ways that are consistent with the discipline. Both the structure of students’ arguments and their use of evidence were predictive of the overall quality of their essays. Finally, students’ use of argumentation strategies revealed patterns relevant to the historical topic and sources in question, as well as to differences related to writing skill. In our sample, better writers used strategies based on facts and evidence from the documents more so than weaker writers and demonstrated the capacity to contextualize and corroborate evidence in their arguments.

Journal: Written Communication
Published: 2012-10-01
DOI: 10.1177/0741088312461591
Open Access: Closed
Topics: artificial intelligence multilingual writers argument

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (7)

Ehrlich et al. (2025)

The Structure of Argumentative Texts Written by Hebrew Speaking Children in Pri…

Written Communication
Steiss et al. (2024)

U.S. Secondary Students’ Source-Based Argument Writing in History

Written Communication
Olson et al. (2023)

Examining the Impact of a Cognitive Strategies Approach on the Argument Writing…

Written Communication
Backman et al. (2023)

Beyond Structure: Using the Rational Force Model to Assess Argumentative Writing

Written Communication
Nokes et al. (2023)

Historical Argumentation: Watching Historians and Teaching Youth

Written Communication

Show all 7 →

Kuhn et al. (2016)

Tracing the Development of Argumentive Writing in a Discourse-Rich Context

Written Communication
O’Hallaron (2014)

Supporting Fifth-Grade ELLs’ Argumentative Writing Development

Written Communication

Cites in this index (1)

YOUNG et al. (1998)

Writing from Primary Documents

Written Communication

Also cites 41 works outside this index ↓

10.1207/s1532690xci1502_1

↗
10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00775.x

↗
10.1207/S1532690XCI2004_2

↗
10.3102/00028312039002423

↗
10.1207/S1532690XCI2101_2

↗
10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.139

↗
10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.03.001

↗
10.1080/00933104.2011.10473465

↗
10.1080/01638538109544512

↗
10.1080/0163853X.2001.9651595

↗
10.1037/a0014702

↗
10.1037/0022-0663.92.4.694

↗
10.2307/1511296

↗
10.1016/S0735-004X(05)18011-2

↗
10.1177/002221949602900501

↗
10.1016/j.jslw.2011.05.004

↗
10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445

↗
10.1016/S0883-0355(97)89728-5

↗
10.1017/CBO9780511571350

↗
10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.06.001

↗
10.1598/JAAL.52.2.1

↗
10.3102/0002831208319733

↗
10.1080/10508406.2010.481014

↗
10.1177/1086296X12450445

↗
10.1598/RRQ.46.3.4

↗
10.1080/0022027900220103

↗
10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.492

↗
10.1080/10508406.2011.564567

↗
10.2307/3588259

↗
10.17763/haer.78.1.v62444321p602101

↗
10.2307/2505213

↗
10.3102/00346543075002125

↗
10.1086/392651

↗
10.1007/s10648-007-9056-1

↗
10.4324/9781410602442

↗
10.3102/000283120390041089

↗
10.4324/9780203839195

↗
10.1017/CBO9780511802034

↗
10.1037/0022-0663.83.1.73

↗
10.3102/00028312028003495

↗
10.1016/j.jeap.2006.08.005

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 59 View in citation network →