Abstract

Nurturing the ability to argue is of great importance in science education, despite students often encountering cognitive and emotional barriers. The aim of this study was to examine the quality of argumentation and the issues raised by secondary school students when they are asked to respond to structured argumentation tasks. We chose topics from two different socio-scientific issues of varied perceived relevance to students’ daily lives: the sale of fast food in school canteens (Group 1) and the addition of antibiotics in animal feed (Group 2). The study involved 249 high school students aged 14–16, in Poland. A total of 139 participants took part in an intervention about fast food, and 110 in an intervention about the use of antibiotics. Data were collected in the form of written arguments developed by students as part of a structured teaching intervention. Quantitative and qualitative methods were used to process and analyze the data. On average, students’ arguments scored higher on the topic of antibiotic use on animal feed. Qualitative content analysis of the students’ arguments identified four thematic groups: (1) personal aspects revealing personal meanings, values, and defence mechanisms; (2) scientific aspects revealing substantive knowledge; (3) socio-cultural aspects revealing economic, sociological or cultural aspects; (4) nonsensical or incoherent arguments. A topic related to students’ personal decisions and perceived to be closest to their lives and daily experience (eating fast food in the school canteen) more often prompted arguments indicating cognitive defence, by denying the harmfulness of fast food and emphasizing possible advantages or appealing to the right to choose. Based on this finding, we discuss the need for defence mechanisms to be considered in pedagogical designs for the teaching of argumentation.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
10.1007/s10503-026-09693-4
CompPile
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (50) · 1 in this index

  1. Andrus, M.R., and M.T. Roth. 2002. Health literacy: A review. Pharmacotherapy: THe Journal of Human Pharmacol…
    Pharmacotherapy: THe Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy  
  2. Readings about the social animal
  3. Social psychology
  4. Aubert-Teillaud, B., A. Bran, and D. C. Vaidis. 2023. Expectation violation and cognitive dissonance theory: …
    European Journal of Social Psychology  
  5. Baker, M. 2009. Argumentative interactions and the social construction of knowledge. In Muller-Mirza N., Perr…
Show all 50 →
  1. Baytelman, A., K. Iordanou, and C.P. Constantinou. 2020. Epistemic beliefs and prior knowledge as predictors …
    Journal of Research in Science Teaching  
  2. Adolescents and Risk. Behavior, Functions, and Protective Factors
  3. Bröder, J., O. Okan, U. Bauer, and P. Pinheiro. 2019. Health literacy in childhood and adolescence. In Intern…
  4. Cicchetti, D., and F. A. Rogosch. 2002. A developmental psychopathology perspective on adolescence. Journal o…
    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology  
  5. Nutrition Education: Linking Research, Theory and Practice
  6. Dawson, V.M., and G. Venville. 2009. High school students’ informal reasoning and argumentation about biotech…
    International Journal of Science Education  
  7. Erikson EH. 1994 Identity and the life cycle. W. W. Norton & Co.
  8. Freijy, T., and E. J. Kothe. 2013. Dissonance-based interventions for health behaviour change: A systematic r…
    British Journal of Health Psychology  
  9. Fulton, J.J., D.K. Marcus, and T. Merkey. 2011. Irrational health beliefs and health anxiety. Journal of Clin…
    Journal of Clinical Psychology  
  10. Gawronski, B., and F. Strack. 2012. Cognitive consistency: A fundamental principle in social cognition. Guilf…
    Guilford Press.
  11. Graneheim, U.H., and B. Lundman. 2004. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures…
    Nurse Education Today  
  12. Graneheim, U.H., B.M. Lindgren, and B. Lundman. 2017. Methodological challenges in qualitative content analys…
    Nurse Education Today  
  13. Haggbloom, S.J., R. Warnick, J.E. Warnick, V.K. Jones, G.L. Yarbrough, T.M. Russell, C.M. Borecky, R. McGahhe…
    Review of General Psychology  
  14. Hashemi, R., and E. A. Vogel. 2024. Adolescents’ perceptions of substance use messaging in the age of social …
    Health Education Research  
  15. Högström, P., N. Gericke, J. Wallin, and E. Bergman. 2024. Teaching socioscientific issues: A systematic revi…
    Science & Education  
  16. Isohätälä, J., P. Näykki, S. Järvelä, and M. J. Baker. 2018. Striking a balance: Socio-emotional processes du…
    Learning, Culture and Social Interaction  
  17. Jankowiak BA. 2017. Zachowania ryzykowne współczesnej młodzieży. Studium teoretyczno-empiryczne. Uniwersytet …
  18. Jimenez, P.C., A.R. Alred, and J.M. Dauer. 2024. Describing undergraduate students’ reasoning and use of evid…
    Frontiers in Education  
  19. Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research
  20. Keskindağ, B. 2023. Understanding smoking behaviour: Interpretative phenomenological analysis highlighting co…
    Current Researches in Health Sciences-III.
  21. Kleemola, K., H. Hyytinen, and A. Toom. 2022. The challenge of position-taking in novice higher education stu…
    Frontiers in Education  
  22. Klein, J., and G. McColl. 2019. Cognitive dissonance: How self-protective distortions can undermine clinical …
    Medical Education  
  23. Koo, T.K., and M.Y. Li. 2016. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for …
    Journal of Chiropractic Medicine  
  24. Handbook of research on science education
  25. Lee, Y. J., M. Kim, and H. G. Yoon. 2015. The intellectual demands of the intended primary science curriculum…
    International Journal of Science Education  
  26. Luginbühl, M., V. Mundwiler, J. Kreuz, D. Müller-Feldmeth, and S. Hauser. 2021. Quantitative and qualitative …
    Gesprächsforschung: Online-Zeitschrift Zur Verbalen Interaktion
  27. McGuire, L., A. Farooq, and A. Rutland. 2023. Adolescents social and moral reasoning about COVID-19 public he…
    Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology  
  28. McNeill, K.L., R. Katsh-Singer, M. González-Howard, and S. Loper. 2016. Factors impacting teachers argumentat…
    International Journal of Science Education  
  29. Mercier, H., and D. Sperber. 2011. Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral an…
    Behavioral and Brain Sciences  
  30. Orcullo, D. J. C., and H. S. Teo. 2016. Understanding cognitive dissonance in smoking behaviour: A qualitativ…
    International Journal of Social Science and Humanity  
  31. Osborne, J. 2010. Arguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourse. Science 328:463…
    Science  
  32. Pérez-Rodrigo, C., and J. Aranceta. 2001. School-based nutrition education: Lessons learned and new perspecti…
    Public Health Nutrition  
  33. Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change
  34. Pfeifer, J.H., and E.T. Berkman. 2018. The development of self and identity in adolescence: Neural evidence a…
    Child Development Perspectives  
  35. Polo, C., K. Lund, C. Plantin, and G. P. Niccolai. 2016. Group emotions: The social and cognitive functions o…
    International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning  
  36. Sadler, T.D. 2006. Promoting discourse and argumentation in science teacher education. Journal of Science Tea…
    Journal of Science Teacher Education  
  37. Sadler, T.D., A. Amirshokoohi, M. Kazempour, and K.M. Allspaw. 2006. Socioscience and ethics in science class…
    Journal of Research in Science Teaching  
  38. Sampson, V., J. Grooms, and J. P. Walker. 2011. Argument-driven inquiry as a way to help students learn how t…
    Science Education  
  39. Argumentation
  40. Schen, M. 2013. A comparison of biology majors’ written arguments across the curriculum. Journal of Biologica…
    Journal of Biological Education  
  41. Schwartz, R.S., N.G. Lederman, and B.A. Crawford. 2004. Developing views of nature of science in an authentic…
    Science Education  
  42. Schworm, S., and A. Renkl. 2007. Learning argumentation skills through the use of prompts for self-explaining…
    Journal of Educational Psychology  
  43. Synowiec-Piłat, M., A. Pałęga, and M. Jędrzejek. 2017. Promocja zdrowia w działaniu: od teorii do praktyki. W…
    Wydawnictwo Eurosystem
  44. The uses of argument
  45. Witte, K., and M. Allen. 2000. A meta-analysis of the effects of fear appeals: Implications for effective pub…
    Health Education & Behavior