Argumentation Mar 2026 Open Access

Between Rationality and Self-protection: Student-Constructed Arguments on Fast Food Consumption and Antibiotic Overuse as Public Health Issues in Biology Education

Eliza Rybska Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań ; Michał Klichowski Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań ; Costas P. Constantinou ; Barbara Jankowiak Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań

Abstract

Nurturing the ability to argue is of great importance in science education, despite students often encountering cognitive and emotional barriers. The aim of this study was to examine the quality of argumentation and the issues raised by secondary school students when they are asked to respond to structured argumentation tasks. We chose topics from two different socio-scientific issues of varied perceived relevance to students’ daily lives: the sale of fast food in school canteens (Group 1) and the addition of antibiotics in animal feed (Group 2). The study involved 249 high school students aged 14–16, in Poland. A total of 139 participants took part in an intervention about fast food, and 110 in an intervention about the use of antibiotics. Data were collected in the form of written arguments developed by students as part of a structured teaching intervention. Quantitative and qualitative methods were used to process and analyze the data. On average, students’ arguments scored higher on the topic of antibiotic use on animal feed. Qualitative content analysis of the students’ arguments identified four thematic groups: (1) personal aspects revealing personal meanings, values, and defence mechanisms; (2) scientific aspects revealing substantive knowledge; (3) socio-cultural aspects revealing economic, sociological or cultural aspects; (4) nonsensical or incoherent arguments. A topic related to students’ personal decisions and perceived to be closest to their lives and daily experience (eating fast food in the school canteen) more often prompted arguments indicating cognitive defence, by denying the harmfulness of fast food and emphasizing possible advantages or appealing to the right to choose. Based on this finding, we discuss the need for defence mechanisms to be considered in pedagogical designs for the teaching of argumentation.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
10.1007/s10503-026-09693-4
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
writing pedagogy teacher development argument qualitative research
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (1)

  1. Sardag et al. (2025)
    Informal Formative Assessment in Argumentation-Based Science Education: A Micro…
    Argumentation
Also cites 36 works outside this index ↓
  1. MR Andrus (2002)
    Andrus, M.R., and M.T. Roth. 2002. Health literacy: A review. Pharmacotherapy: THe Journal of Human Pharmacol…
    Pharmacotherapy: THe Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy  ↗
  2. B Aubert-Teillaud (2023)
    Aubert-Teillaud, B., A. Bran, and D. C. Vaidis. 2023. Expectation violation and cognitive dissonance theory: …
    European Journal of Social Psychology  ↗
  3. Baker, M. 2009. Argumentative interactions and the social construction of knowledge. In Muller-Mirza N., Perr…
     ↗
  4. A Baytelman (2020)
    Baytelman, A., K. Iordanou, and C.P. Constantinou. 2020. Epistemic beliefs and prior knowledge as predictors …
    Journal of Research in Science Teaching  ↗
  5. D Cicchetti (2002)
    Cicchetti, D., and F. A. Rogosch. 2002. A developmental psychopathology perspective on adolescence. Journal o…
    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology  ↗
  6. VM Dawson (2009)
    Dawson, V.M., and G. Venville. 2009. High school students’ informal reasoning and argumentation about biotech…
    International Journal of Science Education  ↗
  7. T Freijy (2013)
    Freijy, T., and E. J. Kothe. 2013. Dissonance-based interventions for health behaviour change: A systematic r…
    British Journal of Health Psychology  ↗
  8. JJ Fulton (2011)
    Fulton, J.J., D.K. Marcus, and T. Merkey. 2011. Irrational health beliefs and health anxiety. Journal of Clin…
    Journal of Clinical Psychology  ↗
  9. UH Graneheim (2004)
    Graneheim, U.H., and B. Lundman. 2004. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures…
    Nurse Education Today  ↗
  10. UH Graneheim (2017)
    Graneheim, U.H., B.M. Lindgren, and B. Lundman. 2017. Methodological challenges in qualitative content analys…
    Nurse Education Today  ↗
  11. SJ Haggbloom (2002)
    Haggbloom, S.J., R. Warnick, J.E. Warnick, V.K. Jones, G.L. Yarbrough, T.M. Russell, C.M. Borecky, R. McGahhe…
    Review of General Psychology  ↗
  12. R Hashemi (2024)
    Hashemi, R., and E. A. Vogel. 2024. Adolescents’ perceptions of substance use messaging in the age of social …
    Health Education Research  ↗
  13. P Högström (2024)
    Högström, P., N. Gericke, J. Wallin, and E. Bergman. 2024. Teaching socioscientific issues: A systematic revi…
    Science & Education  ↗
  14. J Isohätälä (2018)
    Isohätälä, J., P. Näykki, S. Järvelä, and M. J. Baker. 2018. Striking a balance: Socio-emotional processes du…
    Learning, Culture and Social Interaction  ↗
  15. PC Jimenez (2024)
    Jimenez, P.C., A.R. Alred, and J.M. Dauer. 2024. Describing undergraduate students’ reasoning and use of evid…
    Frontiers in Education  ↗
  16. MP Jiménez-Aleixandre (2007)
    Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research
     ↗
  17. K Kleemola (2022)
    Kleemola, K., H. Hyytinen, and A. Toom. 2022. The challenge of position-taking in novice higher education stu…
    Frontiers in Education  ↗
  18. J Klein (2019)
    Klein, J., and G. McColl. 2019. Cognitive dissonance: How self-protective distortions can undermine clinical …
    Medical Education  ↗
  19. TK Koo (2016)
    Koo, T.K., and M.Y. Li. 2016. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for …
    Journal of Chiropractic Medicine  ↗
  20. YJ Lee (2015)
    Lee, Y. J., M. Kim, and H. G. Yoon. 2015. The intellectual demands of the intended primary science curriculum…
    International Journal of Science Education  ↗
  21. L McGuire (2023)
    McGuire, L., A. Farooq, and A. Rutland. 2023. Adolescents social and moral reasoning about COVID-19 public he…
    Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology  ↗
  22. KL McNeill (2016)
    McNeill, K.L., R. Katsh-Singer, M. González-Howard, and S. Loper. 2016. Factors impacting teachers argumentat…
    International Journal of Science Education  ↗
  23. H Mercier (2011)
    Mercier, H., and D. Sperber. 2011. Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral an…
    Behavioral and Brain Sciences  ↗
  24. DJC Orcullo (2016)
    Orcullo, D. J. C., and H. S. Teo. 2016. Understanding cognitive dissonance in smoking behaviour: A qualitativ…
    International Journal of Social Science and Humanity  ↗
  25. J Osborne (2010)
    Osborne, J. 2010. Arguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourse. Science 328:463…
    Science  ↗
  26. C Pérez-Rodrigo (2001)
    Pérez-Rodrigo, C., and J. Aranceta. 2001. School-based nutrition education: Lessons learned and new perspecti…
    Public Health Nutrition  ↗
  27. RE Petty (1986)
    Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change
     ↗
  28. JH Pfeifer (2018)
    Pfeifer, J.H., and E.T. Berkman. 2018. The development of self and identity in adolescence: Neural evidence a…
    Child Development Perspectives  ↗
  29. C Polo (2016)
    Polo, C., K. Lund, C. Plantin, and G. P. Niccolai. 2016. Group emotions: The social and cognitive functions o…
    International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning  ↗
  30. TD Sadler (2006)
    Sadler, T.D. 2006. Promoting discourse and argumentation in science teacher education. Journal of Science Tea…
    Journal of Science Teacher Education  ↗
  31. TD Sadler (2006)
    Sadler, T.D., A. Amirshokoohi, M. Kazempour, and K.M. Allspaw. 2006. Socioscience and ethics in science class…
    Journal of Research in Science Teaching  ↗
  32. V Sampson (2011)
    Sampson, V., J. Grooms, and J. P. Walker. 2011. Argument-driven inquiry as a way to help students learn how t…
    Science Education  ↗
  33. M Schen (2013)
    Schen, M. 2013. A comparison of biology majors’ written arguments across the curriculum. Journal of Biologica…
    Journal of Biological Education  ↗
  34. RS Schwartz (2004)
    Schwartz, R.S., N.G. Lederman, and B.A. Crawford. 2004. Developing views of nature of science in an authentic…
    Science Education  ↗
  35. S Schworm (2007)
    Schworm, S., and A. Renkl. 2007. Learning argumentation skills through the use of prompts for self-explaining…
    Journal of Educational Psychology  ↗
  36. K Witte (2000)
    Witte, K., and M. Allen. 2000. A meta-analysis of the effects of fear appeals: Implications for effective pub…
    Health Education & Behavior  ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Pedagogy Apr 2023
    A Mighty Cooperative ↗
    Jennifer Horwitz
    discourse analysis decolonial rhetorics writing pedagogy teacher development argument qualitative research digital rhetoric multimodality online writing instruction race and writing disability studies place and space editorial matter
  2. Writing and Pedagogy Mar 2021
    The ‘practice’ of close reading and writing in social work education ↗
    Miriam Jaffe
    writing pedagogy teacher development argument qualitative research literacy studies
  3. Literacy in Composition Studies Feb 2021
    Composing Literary Arguments in an 11th Grade International Baccalaureate Classroom: How Classroom Instructional Conversations Shape Modes of Participation ↗
    George E. Newell; Theresa Siemer Thanos; Matt Seymour
    discourse analysis writing pedagogy teacher development argument collaborative writing qualitative research editorial matter
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Jan 2019
    Teaching Public, Scientific Controversy: Genetically Modified Mosquitoes in the Technical Writing Classroom ↗
    Stephanie Phillips
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism writing pedagogy teacher development argument technical communication qualitative research multimodality
  5. Composition Forum 2019
    Service before Self: Military Leadership and Definitions of Service for Composition Studies ↗
    Laura J. Davies
    feminist rhetorics first-year composition writing pedagogy teacher development argument qualitative research gender and writing