Argumentation Sep 2025 Open Access

Teachers’ Perceptions of Argumentation in Citizenship Education: Psychometric Validation of the AASES Instrument and Mediation Analysis of Sociodemographic Variables Using SEM

Delfín Ortega-Sánchez ; Carlos Pérez-González

Abstract

Abstract This study aims to analyze the perceptions of Spanish secondary school teachers in the fields of social and experimental sciences (n = 215) regarding the formative relevance of argumentative competence in the context of citizenship education. It also seeks to provide a psychometric instrument supported by robust empirical evidence of reliability and validity to achieve this goal. Based on a non-experimental, cross-sectional design, the AASES (Assessment of Argumentation in Social and Experimental Sciences) instrument,—developed ad hoc,—is administered to identify the potential relationship of sociodemographic factors with the theoretical subconstructs it comprises, the statistical association between age, origin, and gender, and the mediating role of gender in the relationship between age/place of origin and the defined latent factors, and the existence of significant differences among sociodemographic groups. The results indicate that, although a statistical association between age and gender was observed, the mediating role of gender in the relationship between age, origin, and the latent factors cannot be confirmed. SEM analyses showed that none of the sociodemographic predictors (age, origin, and gender) exert statistically significant direct or mediating effects on the latent factors. Furthermore, the comparative analyses complement the model by indicating that perceptions vary moderately by gender and age, even though these variables do not explain the latent factors in the SEM. Indeed, the analysis of variance revealed significant differences in the Critical and Ethical Skills dimension based on these two factors, with higher scores among male teachers and in the oldest age group, as well as increasing trends, with age, in the perceived importance of argumentation for the development and acquisition of critical thinking skills, informed decision-making, and ethical discussion. The findings highlight the need to incorporate specific spaces within the curriculum and teacher education programs to foster argumentative competencies and informed engagement with controversial socio-scientific issues, taking into account sociodemographic variables as influential factors in the educational process.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2025-09-13
DOI
10.1007/s10503-025-09676-x
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
teacher development argument assessment gender and writing
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (3)

  1. Zenker et al. (2024)
    Norms of Public Argumentation and the Ideals of Correctness and Participation
    Argumentation
  2. Blair (2023)
    Teaching the Fallacies
    Argumentation
  3. Eemeren et al. (2023)
    The Pragma-Dialectical Approach to the Fallacies Revisited
    Argumentation
Also cites 39 works outside this index ↓
  1. E Altun (2025)
    Altun, E., and T. Ozsevgec. 2025. Making argumentation-based learning and teaching happen: Exploring the deve…
    Science & Education  ↗
  2. CSC Asterhan (2016)
    Asterhan, C. S. C., and B. B. Schwarz. 2016. Argumentation for learning: Well-trodden paths and unexplored te…
    Educational Psychologist  ↗
  3. SI Bangdiwala (2013)
    Bangdiwala, S. I., and V. Shankar. 2013. The agreement chart. BMC Medical Research Methodology 13:97. https:/…
    BMC Medical Research Methodology  ↗
  4. SK Banihashem (2024)
    Banihashem, S. K., O. Noroozi, H. J. A. Biemans, and V. C. Tassone. 2024. The intersection of epistemic belie…
    Innovations in Education and Teaching International  ↗
  5. E Bernal-Cavieres (2024)
    Bernal-Cavieres, E., and G. Villalón. 2024. Profesores, deliberación y Contenidos históricos En contexto de E…
    Educación Y Humanismo  ↗
  6. J Bubikova-Moan (2022)
    Bubikova-Moan, J., and M. Sandvik. 2022. Argumentation in early childhood: A systematic review. Human Develop…
    Human Development  ↗
  7. L Casado-Ledesma (2021)
    Casado-Ledesma, L., I. Cuevas, and E. Martín. 2021. Learning science through argumentative synthesis writing …
    Reading and Writing  ↗
  8. Y Dilekli (2019)
    Dilekli, Y., and E. Tezci. 2019. A cross-cultural study: Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for teaching thinkin…
    Thinking Skills and Creativity  ↗
  9. M Evagorou (2023)
    Evagorou, M., M. Vrikki, and E. Papanastasiou. 2023. Students’ and teachers’ voice on the outcomes of a citiz…
    Citizenship, Social and Economics Education  ↗
  10. Fuentes-Moreno, C., M. Sabariego-Puig, and A. Ambrós-Pallarés. 2020. Developing social and civic competence i…
     ↗
  11. Hair, J. F., G. T. M. Hult, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt. 2022. A primer on partial least squares structural…
     ↗
  12. Hair, J. F., M. Sarstedt, C. M. Ringle, and S. P. Gudergan. 2024. Advanced issues in partial least squares st…
     ↗
  13. K Iordanou (2022)
    Iordanou, K. 2022. Supporting strategic and meta-strategic development of argument skill: The role of reflect…
    Metacognition and Learning  ↗
  14. K Iordanou (2015)
    Iordanou, K., and C. P. Constantinou. 2015. Supporting use of evidence in argumentation through practice in a…
    Science Education  ↗
  15. K Iordanou (2021)
    Iordanou, K., and C. Rapanta. 2021. Argue with me: A method for developing argument skills. Frontiers in Psyc…
    Frontiers in Psychology  ↗
  16. D Kuhn (2022)
    Kuhn, D., and M. Halpern. 2022. How might argumentation research inform discourse-based social studies educat…
    The Social Studies  ↗
  17. D Kuhn (2013)
    Kuhn, D., N. Zillmer, A. Crowell, and J. Zavala. 2013. Developing norms of argumentation: Metacognitive, epis…
    Cognition and Instruction  ↗
  18. F Macagno (2016)
    Macagno, F. 2016. Argument relevance and structure: Assessing and developing students’ uses of evidence. Inte…
    International Journal of Educational Research  ↗
  19. O Mallahi (2024)
    Mallahi, O. 2024. Exploring the status of argumentative essay writing strategies and problems of Iranian EFL …
    Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education  ↗
  20. M Martins (2022)
    Martins, M., and F. Macagno. 2022. An analytical instrument for coding and assessing argumentative dialogues …
    Science Education  ↗
  21. F Matos (2021)
    Matos, F. 2021. Collaborative writing as a bridge from peer discourse to individual argumentative writing. Re…
    Reading and Writing  ↗
  22. M Morawski (2019)
    Morawski, M., and A. Budke. 2019. How digital and oral peer feedback improves high school students’ written a…
    Education Sciences  ↗
  23. O Noroozi (2023)
    Noroozi, O., S. K. Banihashem, N. T. Kerman, M. P. A. Khaneh, M. Babaee, H. Ashrafi, and H. J. A. Biemans. 20…
    Interactive Learning Environments  ↗
  24. EM Nussbaum (2020)
    Nussbaum, E. M. 2020. Critical integrative argumentation: Toward complexity in students’ thinking. Educationa…
    Educational Psychologist  ↗
  25. P Olmos (2022)
    Olmos, P. 2022. Argumentación y Pensamiento crítico: Convergencias y desafíos. SCIO: Revista De Filosofía 22:…
    SCIO: Revista De Filosofía  ↗
  26. MP Pérez-Echeverría (2016)
    Pérez-Echeverría, M.P., Y. Postigo, and M. García-Mila. 2016. Argumentation and education: Notes for a debate…
    Infancia y Aprendizaje  ↗
  27. C Rapanta (2021)
    Rapanta, C. 2021. Can teachers implement a student-centered dialogical argumentation method across the curric…
    Teaching and Teacher Education  ↗
  28. C Rapanta (2022)
    Rapanta, C., and M. K. Felton. 2022. Learning to argue through dialogue: A review of instructional approaches…
    Educational Psychology Review  ↗
  29. C Rapanta (2016)
    Rapanta, C., and F. Macagno. 2016. Argumentation methods in educational contexts: Introduction to the special…
    International Journal of Educational Research  ↗
  30. C Rapanta (2013)
    Rapanta, C., M. García-Mila, and S. Gilabert. 2013. What is meant by argumentative competence?? An integrativ…
    Review Of Educational Research  ↗
  31. O Sengul (2019)
    Sengul, O. 2019. Linking scientific literacy, scientific argumentation, and democratic citizenship. Universal…
    Universal Journal of Educational Research  ↗
  32. Y Shi (2020)
    Shi, Y. 2020. Constructed dialogs reveal skill development in argumentive writing. Reading and Writing 33:231…
    Reading and Writing  ↗
  33. C Spagnolo (2024)
    Spagnolo, C. 2024. Teachers’ and students’ beliefs on developing argumentative competence. Edma 0–6: Educació…
    Edma 0–6: Educación Matemática en la Infancia  ↗
  34. E Tsemach (2021)
    Tsemach, E., and A. Zohar. 2021. The intersection of gender and culture in argumentative writing. Internation…
    International Journal of Science Education  ↗
  35. B Ucar-Longford (2024)
    Ucar-Longford, B., A. Hosein, and M. Heron. 2024. Improving pre-service teachers’ argumentation skills: A hol…
    Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education  ↗
  36. Ö Ulu-Kalin (2024)
    Ulu-Kalin, Ö., and H. Kumandaş-Öztürk. 2024. Classification of higher-order thinking skills of the teachers b…
    Behavioral Sciences  ↗
  37. A Valero Haro (2022)
    Valero, A., O. Noroozi, H. Biemans, and M. Mulder. 2022. Argumentation competence: Students’ argumentation kn…
    Journal of Constructivist Psychology  ↗
  38. JJ Vicente (2024)
    Vicente, J.J., A.J. Franco-Mariscal, and J.M. Oliva. 2024. Enhancing argumentation and decision-making of pre…
    Science & Education  ↗
  39. Wang, L. J. 2025. Enhancing EFL argumentative writing: The impact of an online collaborative argumentation en…
     ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Pedagogy Apr 2024
    To Reimagine . . . To Start Again ↗
    Zachary C. Beare; Jessica Masterson; Shari J. Stenberg
    rhetorical criticism first-year composition writing pedagogy graduate education teacher development argument assessment writing program administration professional writing labor and working conditions multimodality race and writing gender and writing affect and writing editorial matter
  2. Pedagogy Oct 2022
    Contributors ↗
    rhetorical criticism first-year composition writing pedagogy teacher development argument assessment technical communication archival research multimodality gender and writing literary studies book reviews editorial matter
  3. Pedagogy Jan 2022
    Contributors ↗
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism genre theory discourse analysis african american rhetorics decolonial rhetorics first-year composition writing pedagogy basic writing writing across the curriculum graduate education teacher development argument collaborative writing transfer assessment portfolios writing program administration writing centers peer tutoring technical communication professional writing archival research digital rhetoric social media grammar and mechanics literacy studies race and writing gender and writing disability studies public rhetoric community literacy literary studies editorial matter
  4. Pedagogy Jan 2026
    “Not a Detour from Rigor” ↗
    Krysten Stein; Kishonna Gray
    writing pedagogy teacher development collaborative writing assessment gender and writing
  5. Assessing Writing Jan 2026
    How reliable and valid is peer evaluation in adolescents’ L2 argumentative writing? ↗
    Albert W. Li; Steve Graham
    writing pedagogy teacher development argument assessment multilingual writers grammar and mechanics literacy studies