Abstract

Abstract This article argues that care — especially care grounded in Black feminist traditions — is not an affective supplement to teaching but rather the radical foundation of liberatory pedagogy. Amid rising attacks on critical education and the austerity logics of the neoliberal university, the authors theorize care as infrastructure, method, and resistance. Drawing from the work of bell hooks, Audre Lorde, Patricia Hill Collins, Mia Mingus, and Leah Lakshmi Piepzna-Samarasinha, they offer a framework for care-centered teaching that foregrounds mutuality, trust, and collective accountability. Through vignettes, student reflections, and practices such as trauma-informed design, mutual aid, and collaborative assessment, the article demonstrates how care fosters relational transformation and deep intellectual engagement. It also interrogates the structural devaluation of care labor, particularly for women and faculty of color, and challenges dominant educational paradigms that equate rigor with detachment. As one student reflected, “You believed me when I said I needed more time, without asking for proof. That made me want to do the work even more.” Drawing from their institutional experiences, the authors position teaching as a form of organizing — an insurgent, relational practice that refuses extractive academic norms while building collective conditions for educational and institutional transformation.

Journal
Pedagogy
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
10.1215/15314200-12097258
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 3 works outside this index ↓
  1. Boring, Anne , KellieOttoboni, and Philip B.Stark. 2016. “Student Evaluations of Teaching (Mostly) …
  2. The Gig Academy: Mapping Labor in the Neoliberal University
  3. Race and Gender Oppression in the Classroom: The Experiences of Women Faculty of Color wi…
    Teaching Sociology  
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →