The Pragma-Dialectical Approach to the Fallacies Revisited

Frans H. van Eemeren Leiden University ; Bart Garssen University of Amsterdam

Abstract

AbstractThis article explains the design and development of the pragma-dialectical approach to fallacies. In this approach fallacies are viewed as violations of the standards for critical discussion that are expressed in a code of conduct for reasonable argumentative discourse. After the problem-solving validity in resolving differences of opinion of the rules of this code has been discussed, their conventional validity for real-life arguers is demonstrated. Starting from the extended version of the theory in which the strategic maneuvering taking place in argumentative discourse is included, the article explains that the violations of the rules that are committed in the fallacies involve derailments of strategic maneuvering. This culminates in a discussion of the exploitation of hidden fallaciousness as an unreasonable way of increasing the effectiveness of argumentative discourse – a vital topic of research in present-day pragma-dialectics.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2023-06-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-023-09605-w
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cites in this index (1)

  1. Argumentation
Also cites 11 works outside this index ↓
  1. van Eemeren, F. H. 2010. Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse. Extending the pragma-dialectical t…
  2. Reasonableness and effectiveness in argumentative discourse. Fifty contributions to the d…
  3. van Eemeren, F. H. 2018. Argumentation theory. A pragma-dialectical perspective. Dordrecht etc.: Springer. Ar…
  4. In actual practice. Topical studies about argumentative discourse in context
  5. van Eemeren, F. H., B. Garssen, and B. Meuffels. 2012b. The extended pragma-dialectical argumentation theory …
  6. Scrutinizing argumentation in practice
  7. Speech acts in argumentative discussions. A theoretical model for the analysis of discuss…
  8. van Eemeren, F. H., and R. Grootendorst. 1988. Rationale for a pragma-dialectical perspective. In F. H. van E…
  9. Dialectic and rhetoric. The warp and woof of argumentation analysis
  10. van Eemeren, F. H., and P. Houtlosser. 2009. How to respond to fallacious moves? In F. H. van Eemeren (2015),…
  11. Fallacies, selected papers 1972–1982