Argumentation Apr 2026

Ad Hominem at the Boundary of Reasonableness: Strategic Maneuvering and Ideological Polarization in the 2024 Indonesian Presidential Debates

Saiyidinal Firdaus State University of Jakarta
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2026-04-02
DOI
10.1007/s10503-026-09700-8
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (30) · 5 in this index

  1. S Aikin (2025)
    Aikin, S. 2025. Three puzzles with Ad hominem arguments. Journal of the American Philosophical Association 11…
    Journal of the American Philosophical Association  ↗
  2. AntaraNews. 2023. Indonesia’s KPU opens first presidential debate for 2024 elections. https://en.antaranews.c…
  3. Ardipandanto, A. 2024. Kelemahan Pelaksanaan Debat Calon Presiden / Wakil Presiden 2024. Info Singkat XVI (1)…
  4. Benoit, W. L. 2022. Communication in political campaigns. New York, United States of America: Peter Lang. htt…
     ↗
  5. T Bøggild (2025)
    Bøggild, T., and C. Jensen. 2025. When politicians behave badly: Political, democratic, and social consequenc…
    American Journal of Political Science  ↗
Show all 30 →
  1. AN Cholifah (2024)
    Cholifah, A. N., D. Alfaruqy, R. Pustika, and S. Sunarsih. 2024. Unmasking logical fallacies: An analysis of …
    Journal of Pragmatics and Discourse Research  ↗
  2. Fernandes et al. (2026)
    Are Insinuated Ad Hominem Arguments Rhetorically Effective? Yes, but Conditions Apply
    Argumentation
  3. Matthew Feinberg (2022)
    Feinberg, Matthew, and Jeremy A. Frimer. 2022. Incivility diminishes interest in what politicians have to say…
    Social Psychological and Personality Science  ↗
  4. Saiyidinal Firdaus (2025)
    Firdaus, Saiyidinal. 2025. Reconstruction of political ideology through Ad hominem argument strategy in the 2…
    International Seminar on Humanity Education and Language  ↗
  5. Goffredo, P., Haddadan, S., Vorakitphan, V., Cabrio. E., Villata, S. 2022. Fallacious argument classification…
     ↗
  6. Hansen, H. V. 2009. Commentary on dima Mohammed’s Ad hominem as a derailment of confrontational strategic man…
  7. Macagno (2013)
    Strategies of Character Attack
    Argumentation
  8. Schroeder, A. 2016. Presidential debates: Risky business on the campaign trail. New York: Columbia University…
     ↗
  9. Y Setyaningsih (2025)
    Setyaningsih, Y., R. K. Rahardi, and W. Rahmat. 2025. Unpacking argumentative fallacies in indonesia’s 2024 p…
    Jurnal Gramatika  ↗
  10. Tindale (2018)
    David Hitchcock (2017): On Reasoning and Argument: Essays in Informal Logic and…
    Argumentation
  11. TA van Dijk (1990)
    van Dijk, T. A. 1990. Discourse & society: A new journal for a new research focus. Discourse & Society 1 (1):…
    Discourse & Society  ↗
  12. van Dijk, T. A. 2008. Discourse and context: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press…
     ↗
  13. TA Van Dijk (2012)
    Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach
  14. Van Dijk, T. A. 2014a. Critical discourse studies: a sociocognitive approach. In The discourse studies reader…
     ↗
  15. van Dijk, T. A. 2014b. Discourse and knowledge: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Pr…
     ↗
  16. van Eemeren, F. H. 2010. Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: Extending the pragma-dialectical t…
     ↗
  17. Eemeren et al. (2023)
    The Pragma-Dialectical Approach to the Fallacies Revisited
    Argumentation
  18. van Eemeren, F. H., and P. Houtlosser. 2015. Strategic maneuvering: Examining argumentation in context. In Re…
     ↗
  19. Eemeren et al. (2023)
    The Making of Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-dialectical View
    Argumentation
  20. Walton, D. 1998. Ad hominem arguments. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press. https://books.google.co.id/bo…
  21. Walton, D. 2008. Informal logic: A pragmatic approach. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://…
  22. Wu, Peng. 2017. Strategic maneuvering by personal attacks in spokespersons’ argumentative replies at diplomat…
     ↗
  23. Wu, Peng. 2023. Responding to questions at press conferences: Confrontational maneuvering by Chinese spokespe…
     ↗
  24. Zarefsky, D. 2003. Felicity conditions for the circumstantial ad hominem. In Anyone Who Has a View: Theoretic…
     ↗
  25. Zarefsky, D. 2014. Rhetorical Perspectives on Argumentation, vol. 24. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-…
     ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network → Build reading path →