Argumentation Mar 2026 Open Access

Are Insinuated Ad Hominem Arguments Rhetorically Effective? Yes, but Conditions Apply

Daniel de Oliveira Fernandes University of Fribourg ; Steve Oswald University of Fribourg

Abstract

Abstract Personal attacks, which might convey damaging accusations, can take either an explicit or an implicit form. When they are communicated implicitly, they are referred to as insinuations . Their implicit nature is said to allow speakers to evade responsibility, preserve their public image, or even conceal argumentative weaknesses. In previous studies, we found that insinuated ad hominem arguments supporting disagreement made speakers appear more persuasive and trustworthy than explicit ones. However, further exploratory analyses of our data revealed that the advantage of insinuated over explicit ad hominem arguments was either only present or more pronounced when the personal attack was fallacious. This distinction between explicitness and fallaciousness —and their possible interaction—had not been accounted for in earlier work. To investigate this interaction more systematically, we conducted four preregistered experiments examining the combined effects of explicitness and fallaciousness in ad hominem arguments. Results indicate that there is no significant interaction between fallaciousness and implicitness, regardless of whether the personal attack targets the proponent’s expertise or character. While the often-assumed persuasive benefits of insinuation do not consistently emerge—and may even undermine argumentative support in the context of disagreemen—insinuation confers social advantages, as the speaker is perceived as more trustworthy overall. Moreover, valid arguments are consistently preferred over fallacious ones—not only when it comes to supporting disagreement, but also in shaping how the speaker is perceived. This suggests that while pragmatic subtleties, such as insinuation, can enhance perceived trustworthiness, argumentative soundness remains a central criterion in both rhetorical and interpersonal judgments.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-025-09681-0
CompPile
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
rhetorical criticism
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Firdaus (2026)
    Ad Hominem at the Boundary of Reasonableness: Strategic Maneuvering and Ideolog…
    Argumentation

References (41)

  1. Aristotle. 1984. Complete Works of Aristotle, Vol. 1 (J. Barnes, Ed.; Bollingen Series edition). Princeton Un…
  2. DM Bell (1997)
    Bell, D.M. 1997. Innuendo. Journal of Pragmatics 27 (1): 35–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(97)88001-0.
    Journal of Pragmatics  ↗
  3. P Bondy (2010)
    Bondy, P. 2010. Argumentative injustice. Informal Logic 30 (3): 263–278. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v30i3.3034.
    Informal Logic  ↗
  4. Brown, P., and S. C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in Language usage. Cambridge University Press.
     ↗
  5. LL Carli (1990)
    Carli, L.L. 1990. Gender, language, and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59 (5): 941–9…
    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology  ↗
Show all 41 →
  1. Chalupnik, M., C. Christie, and L. Mullany. 2017. (Im)politeness and Gender. In J. Culpeper, M. Haugh, & D. Z…
     ↗
  2. Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd Edition). Routledge. https://doi.…
     ↗
  3. Copi, I. M., Carl Cohen, and K. McMahon. 2014. Introduction to logic. Pearson.
  4. de Oliveira Fernandes, D., and S. Oswald. 2023. On the Rhetorical Effectiveness of Implicit Meaning - A Pragm…
     ↗
  5. Fraser, B. 2001. An account of innuendo. In Pragmatics & beyond new series, ed. I. Kenesei, and R. M. Harnish…
     ↗
  6. M Fuoli (2018)
    Fuoli, M., and C. Hart. 2018. Trust-building strategies in corporate discourse: An experimental study. Discou…
    Discourse & Society  ↗
  7. M Fuoli (2014)
    Fuoli, M., and C. Paradis. 2014. A model of trust-repair discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 74: 52–69. https://…
    Journal of Pragmatics  ↗
  8. Goffman, E. 1982. Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior (1st Pantheon Books ed). Pantheon Books.
     ↗
  9. N Gotzner (2021)
    Gotzner, N., and D. Mazzarella. 2021. Face management and negative strengthening: The role of power relations…
    Frontiers in Psychology  ↗
  10. A Haro Marchal (2025)
    Haro Marchal, A. 2025. It’s a two-way street: The joint meaning of illocutionary acts of arguing. Informal Lo…
    Informal Logic  ↗
  11. T Holtgraves (1992)
    Holtgraves, T., and J. Yang. 1992. Interpersonal underpinnings of request strategies: General principles and …
    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology  ↗
  12. J Hurwitz (2005)
    Hurwitz, J., and M. Peffley. 2005. Playing the race card in the post–Willie Horton era: The impact of raciali…
    Public Opinion Quarterly  ↗
  13. Lakoff, R. 1975. Language and woman’s place. Harper & Row.
  14. Lakoff, R. 2003. Language, Gender, and Politics: Putting Women and Power in the Same Sentence. In J. Holmes &…
     ↗
  15. S Lee (2012)
    Lee, S. 2012. A pragmatic analysis of defamation and slanderous remarks. Korean Journal of Linguistics 37(2):…
    Korean Journal of Linguistics  ↗
  16. E Lombardi Vallauri (2014)
    Lombardi Vallauri, E., and V. Masia. 2014. Implicitness impact: Measuring texts. Journal of Pragmatics 61: 16…
    Journal of Pragmatics  ↗
  17. Lomelí Hernández, A., and J. Schumann. 2023. Gender Bias in Argument Evaluation. 10th International Society f…
  18. Mannaioli, G. 2025. Vagueness as an Implicitating Persuasive Strategy (Vol. 350). John Benjamins Publishing C…
     ↗
  19. RC Mayer (1999)
    Mayer, R.C., and J.H. Davis. 1999. The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A …
    Journal of Applied Psychology  ↗
  20. RC Mayer (1995)
    Mayer, R.C., J.H. Davis, and F.D. Schoorman. 1995. An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy Of M…
    Academy Of Management Review  ↗
  21. D Mazzarella (2018)
    Mazzarella, D., R. Reinecke, I. Noveck, and H. Mercier. 2018. Saying, presupposing and implicating: How pragm…
    Journal of Pragmatics  ↗
  22. Mercier, H. 2017. Confirmation bias – myside bias. In R. F. Pohl (Ed.), Cognitive illusions: Intriguing pheno…
  23. P Morency (2008)
    Morency, P., S. Oswald, and L. de Saussure. 2008. Explicitness, implicitness and commitment attribution: A co…
    Belgian Journal of Linguistics  ↗
  24. RS Nickerson (1998)
    Nickerson, R.S. 1998. Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review Of General Psychology…
    Review Of General Psychology  ↗
  25. Oswald, S. 2022. Insinuation is committing. Journal of Pragmatics 198 (1): 158–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j…
     ↗
  26. S Pinker (2007)
    Pinker, S. 2007. The evolutionary social psychology of off-record indirect speech acts. Intercultural Pragmat…
    Intercultural Pragmatics  ↗
  27. Posit Team. 2024. RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R (Version 2023.12.1.402) [Computer softwar…
  28. R Core Team. 2023. R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 4.3.2) [Computer software…
  29. D Sperber (1995)
    Sperber, D., F. Cara, and V. Girotto. 1995. Relevance theory explains the selection task. Cognition 57(1):31–…
    Cognition  ↗
  30. NA Valentino (2002)
    Valentino, N.A., V.L. Hutchings, and I.K. White. 2002. Cues that matter: How political ads prime racial attit…
    American Political Science Review  ↗
  31. F van Eemeren (2000)
    van Eemeren, F., B. Meuffels, and M. Verburg. 2000. The (Un)Reasonableness of ad hominem fallacies. Journal o…
    Journal of Language and Social Psychology  ↗
  32. van Eemeren, F., B. Garssen, and B. Meuffels. 2009. Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness (Vol. 16). Spri…
     ↗
  33. C Vullioud (2017)
    Vullioud, C., F. Clément, T. Scott-Phillips, and H. Mercier. 2017. Confidence as an expression of commitment:…
    Evolution and Human Behavior  ↗
  34. Wagemans, J. 2016. Constructing a periodic table of arguments. In P. Bondy & L. Benacquista (Eds.), Proceedin…
     ↗
  35. Walton, D. 1998. Ad hominem arguments. University of Alabama.
  36. Walton, D. 2006. Fundamentals of critical argumentation. Cambridge University Press.
     ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Computers and Composition Jun 2026
    Navigating platform algorithms: Global south feminist activists’ rhetorical and composition practices in digital advocacy on social media ↗
    Kalpana Shrestha
    rhetorical criticism social media gender and writing
  2. Computers and Composition Jun 2026
    Legacies, commitments, and new challenges: The Sweetland Digital Rhetoric Collaborative interviews three generations of Computers and Composition editors ↗
    Ali Alalem; Alyse Campbell; Thais Rodrigues Cons; Funmilola Fadairo; Nicole Koyuki Golden
    rhetorical criticism collaborative writing digital rhetoric
  3. Computers and Composition Jun 2026
    How Baldwin's voice moved Cambridge: Activation contours, mimesis, and a computational approach to rhetoric's sensorium ↗
    David M. Rieder; Michael R. Jackson
    rhetorical criticism
  4. Written Communication May 2026
    Genres Fall Apart: Recuperating the Centrifugal in Rhetorical Genre Analysis ↗
    Rebecca Lorimer Leonard; Angela Rounsaville
    rhetorical criticism genre theory multilingual writers literacy studies community literacy
  5. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly May 2026
    Andrew Carnegie and the Rhetorical History of Business and Professional Communication ↗
    Joe Edward Hatfield
    rhetorical criticism teacher development professional writing archival research