Metaphors and Linguistic Intimacy in Ad Populum Arguments

Francesca Ervas University of Cagliari ; Giulia Zucca University of Cagliari ; Oriana Mosca University of Cagliari

Abstract

Metaphor is a pragmatic device that might influence how arguments are evaluated. Beyond its cognitive and aesthetic value, metaphor also fosters linguistic intimacy, i.e., the feeling of belonging to an intimate community. The paper hypothesizes that linguistic intimacy might be particularly relevant in ad populum arguments, where a sense of belonging to the community endorsing the argument might influence the acceptance of the conclusion. In ad populum arguments, indeed, metaphors might act as a “concealed invitation” to accept and share a conclusion, encouraging effortful interpretation that results in a feeling of shared community. However, not all ad populum arguments are fallacious: they may reflect reasonable consensus, with the agreement with their conclusion depending on how they are framed. The article presents an empirical study investigating whether conventional and novel emotive metaphors vs. their literal counterparts within ad populum premises increase participants’ acceptance of the argument conclusion. The results showed that especially novel and negative metaphors in the premises make people less prone to evaluate the conclusion of ad populum arguments as logically acceptable, while conventional and positive metaphors in the premises makes them feel intimacy with the group of people supporting the conclusion, more easily leading to agreement with their conclusion.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-026-09690-7
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (5)

  1. Argumentation
  2. Argumentation
  3. Argumentation
  4. Argumentation
  5. Argumentation
Also cites 55 works outside this index ↓
  1. Bambini, V., C. Bertini, W. Schaeken, A. Stella, and F. Di Russo. 2016. Disentangling metaphor from context: …
    Frontiers in Psychology  
  2. Black, M. 1954. Metaphor. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 55: 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1093/aristo…
    Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society  
  3. Blanchette, I., and A. Richards. 2010. The influence of affects on higher level cognition: a review of resear…
    Cognition & Emotion  
  4. Bowes, A., and A. Katz. 2015. Metaphor creates intimacy and temporarily enhances theory of mind. Memory & cog…
    Memory & Cognition  
  5. Carston, R. 1997. Enrichment and Loosening: Complementary Processes in Deriving the Proposition Expressed?. I…
  6. Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication
  7. Carston, R. 2010. Metaphor: Ad hoc concepts, literal meaning and mental images. Proceedings of the Aristoteli…
    Proceedings of the Aristotelian society   
  8. Carston, R., and C. Wearing. 2011. Metaphor, hyperbole and simile: A pragmatic approach. Language and Cogniti…
  9. Citron, F.M., and A.E. Goldberg. 2014. Metaphorical sentences are more emotionally engaging than their litera…
    Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience  
  10. Clore, G.L., and J.R. Huntsinger. 2007. How emotions inform judgment and regulate thought. Trends Cogn. Sci 1…
    Trends in Cognitive Sciences  
  11. Cohen, T. 1978. Metaphor and the Cultivation of Intimacy. Critical inquiry 5(1): 3–12.
    Critical Inquiry  
  12. Passionate Engines. What Emotions reveals about Mind and Artificial Intelligence
  13. De Sousa, R. 2008. Really, what else is there? Emotions, value and morality. Critical Quarterly, 50(4).
  14. Dokic, J. 2012. Seeds of self-knowledge: Noetic feelings and metacognition. Foundations of metacognition 6: 3…
    Foundations of Metacognition  
  15. Ervas, F. 2022. Feeling the extraordinary in ordinary language: familiarity and linguistic intimacy. Metodo 1…
    Metodo  
  16. Ervas, F., A. Ledda, A. Ojha, GA. Pierro, and B. Indurkhya. 2018. Creative Argumentation: When and Why People…
  17. Ervas, F., MG. Rossi, A. Ojha, and B. Indurkhya. 2021. The Double Framing Effect of Emotive Metaphors in Argu…
    Frontiers in Psychology  
  18. Ervas, F., and O. Mosca. 2024. An experimental study on the evaluation of metaphorical ad hominem arguments. …
    Informal Logic  
  19. Fredrickson, B.L., and C. Branigan. 2005. Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action…
    Cognition & Emotion  
  20. Gildea, P., and S. Glucksberg. 1983. On understanding metaphor: the role of context. Journal of verbal learni…
    Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior  
  21. Understanding Figurative Language: From Metaphors to Idioms
  22. Glucksberg, S. 2003. The psycholinguistics of metaphor. Trends Cogn. Sci. 7: 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S…
    Trends in Cognitive Sciences  
  23. Glucksberg, S., and A. Estes. 2000. Feature accessibility in conceptual combination: effects of context-induc…
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review  
  24. Godden, D. 2015. Argumentation, rationality, and psychology of reasoning. Informal logic 35(2): 135–166.
    Informal Logic  
  25. Hall A. 2008. Free Enrichment or Hidden Indexicals?. Mind & Language 23: 426-456. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1…
  26. Horton, W. S. 2007. Metaphor and readers’ attributions of intimacy. Memory & cognition 35(1): 87–94.
    Memory & Cognition  
  27. Horton, W.S. 2013. Character intimacy influences the processing of metaphoric utterances during narrative com…
    Metaphor and Symbol  
  28. Jansen, H. 2020. “The people want it” Analysis and evaluation of the populist argument in the context of deli…
    Journal of Argumentation in Context  
  29. Emotive Language in Argumentation
  30. Maiese, M. 2014. How can emotions be both cognitive and bodily? Phenomenology and Cognitive Science 13: 513–5…
    Phenomenology and Cognitive Science  
  31. Oswald, S. 2023. Pragmatics for argumentation. Journal of Pragmatics 203: 144–156.
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  32. Panzeri, F., S. Di Paola, and F. Domaneschi. 2021. Does the COVID-19 war metaphor influence reasoning?. Plos …
    PLoS One  
  33. Pollaroli, C., S. Greco, S. Oswald, J. Miecznikowski, and A. Rocci. 2019. Rhetoric and Language: emotions and…
    Informal Logic  
  34. Rozin, P., and E.B. Royzman. 2001. Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and soci…
    Personality and Social Psychology Review  
  35. Santibáñez, C. 2010. Metaphors and argumentation: The case of Chilean parliamentarian media participation. Jo…
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  36. Schumann, J., S. Zufferey, and S. Oswald. 2019. What makes a straw man acceptable? Three experiments assessin…
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  37. Semino, E., Z. Demjen, and J. Demmen. 2016. An integrated approach to metaphor and framing in cognition, disc…
    Applied Linguistics  
  38. Solomon, R.C. 2003. I. Emotions, thoughts and feelings: What is a ‘cognitive theory’of the emotions and does …
    Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement  
  39. Steen, G. 2017. Deliberate Metaphor Theory: Basic assumptions, main tenets, urgent issues. Intercultural prag…
    Intercultural Pragmatics  
  40. Steen, G. J., W.G. Reijnierse, and C. Burgers. 2014. When do natural language metaphors influence reasoning? …
    PLoS One  
  41. Thibodeau, P.H., and L. Boroditsky. 2011. Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning. PloS on…
    PLoS One  
  42. Thibodeau, P.H., and L. Boroditsky. 2013. Natural language metaphors covertly influence reasoning. PloS one 8…
    PLoS One  
  43. Fallacies and argument appraisal
  44. van Eemeren, F.H., B. Garssen, E.C.W. Krabbe, A.F. Snoeck Henkemans, B. Verheij, and J.H.M. Wagemans. 2014. H…
  45. van Eemeren, F.H., and R. Grootendorst. (Eds.). 2004. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. The pragma-dialec…
  46. van Eemeren, F.H. 2015. Fallacies as Derailments of Argumentative Discourse Acceptance Based on Understanding…
  47. Argumentation theory: A pragma-dialectical perspective
  48. van Eemeren, F.H., B. Meuffels, and M. Verburg. 2000. The (Un)Reasonableness of Ad Hominem Fallacies. Journal…
    Journal of Language and Social Psychology  
  49. Fallacies and Judgment of Reasonableness. Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialec…
  50. van Eemeren, F.H., B. Garssen, and B. Meuffels. 2012. The disguised abusive ad hominem empirically investigat…
    Thinking & Reasoning  
  51. van Poppel, L. 2020. The relevance of metaphor in argumentation. Uniting pragma-dialectics and deliberate met…
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  52. van Poppel and Pilgram. 2023. Types of Resistance to Metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol 38(4): 311-328. https://do…
  53. van Poppel and Pilgram. 2024. Exploiting metaphor in disagreements. Journal of Language Aggression and Confli…
  54. Wagemans, J. 2016. Analyzing metaphor in argumentative discourse. Rivista italiana di filosofia del linguaggi…
  55. Wagemans, J.H. 2019. Four basic argument forms. Research in Language 17(1): 57–69. https://doi.org/10.2478/re…
    Research in Language (RiL)