Beyond Structure: Using the Rational Force Model to Assess Argumentative Writing

Ylva Backman Luleå University of Technology ; Alina Reznitskaya Montclair State University ; Viktor Gardelli Luleå University of Technology ; Ian A. G. Wilkinson The Ohio State University

Abstract

Current approaches used in educational research and practice to evaluate the quality of written arguments often rely on structural analysis. In such assessments, credit is awarded for the presence of structural elements of an argument, such as claims, evidence, and rebuttals. In this article, we discuss limitations of such approaches, including the absence of criteria for evaluating the quality of the argument elements. We then present an alternative framework, based on the Rational Force Model (RFM), which originated from the work of a Nordic philosopher Næss. Using an example of an argumentative essay, we demonstrate the potential of the RFM to improve argument analysis by focusing on the acceptability and relevance of argument elements, two criteria widely considered to be fundamental markers of argument strength. We outline possibilities and challenges with using the RFM in educational contexts and conclude by proposing directions for future research.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2023-04-01
DOI
10.1177/07410883221148664
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Written Communication

Cites in this index (4)

  1. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  2. Written Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Research in the Teaching of English
Also cites 39 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1080/00461520.2016.1155458
  2. 10.1080/00461520.2020.1786388
  3. 10.1002/sce.20402
  4. 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2021.10.002
  5. 10.1080/00461520.2017.1341319
  6. 10.1037/10903-000
  7. 10.1598/RRQ.43.4.5
  8. 10.1007/s11422-017-9847-8
  9. 10.1002/sce.20012
  10. 10.1037/a0014702
  11. 10.1080/00461520.2016.1168741
  12. 10.4324/9781315795225
  13. 10.1007/s11422-017-9846-9
  14. 10.1002/sce.20395
  15. 10.1177/0956797611402512
  16. 10.1080/23735082.2015.994254
  17. 10.1111/1467-8624.00605
  18. 10.1007/s10648-008-9081-8
  19. 10.1002/tea.20430
  20. 10.1002/sce.21081
  21. 10.1207/s1532690xci1402_1
  22. 10.1598/RRQ.46.3.4
  23. 10.1007/s11165-011-9266-x
  24. 10.1007/s11145-018-9848-3
  25. 10.1126/science.1183944
  26. 10.1002/tea.20035
  27. 10.5817/SP2019-4-8
  28. 10.1080/21645515.2020.1780846
  29. 10.22329/il.v42i1.7222
  30. 10.3102/0034654313487606
  31. Reznitskaya A., Anderson R. C., McNurlen B., Nguyen-Jahiel K., Archodidou A., Kim S. (2001). Influence of ora…
  32. 10.1080/03057640802701952
  33. 10.5817/SP2019-4-3
  34. 10.1002/sce.20276
  35. 10.3138/9781487574475
  36. 10.3138/9781442681859
  37. 10.1080/19462166.2013.858183
  38. 10.1017/CBO9780511802034
  39. 10.1002/tea.10008
CrossRef global citation count: 8 View in citation network →