Beyond Structure: Using the Rational Force Model to Assess Argumentative Writing

Ylva Backman Luleå University of Technology ; Alina Reznitskaya Montclair State University ; Viktor Gardelli Luleå University of Technology ; Ian A. G. Wilkinson The Ohio State University

Abstract

Current approaches used in educational research and practice to evaluate the quality of written arguments often rely on structural analysis. In such assessments, credit is awarded for the presence of structural elements of an argument, such as claims, evidence, and rebuttals. In this article, we discuss limitations of such approaches, including the absence of criteria for evaluating the quality of the argument elements. We then present an alternative framework, based on the Rational Force Model (RFM), which originated from the work of a Nordic philosopher Næss. Using an example of an argumentative essay, we demonstrate the potential of the RFM to improve argument analysis by focusing on the acceptability and relevance of argument elements, two criteria widely considered to be fundamental markers of argument strength. We outline possibilities and challenges with using the RFM in educational contexts and conclude by proposing directions for future research.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2023-04-01
DOI
10.1177/07410883221148664
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Written Communication

References (62) · 4 in this index

  1. 10.1080/00461520.2016.1155458
  2. Scientific thinking tools: A base for academic studies
  3. 10.1080/00461520.2020.1786388
  4. 10.1002/sce.20402
  5. Argumentation analysis: Skills for critical thinking
Show all 62 →
  1. Argumentationsanalys
  2. 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2021.10.002
  3. 10.1080/00461520.2017.1341319
  4. Personal epistemology and teacher education
  5. Written Communication
  6. Epistemic criteria and reliable processes as indicators of argument quality in science st…
  7. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  8. Written Communication
  9. 10.1037/10903-000
  10. 10.1598/RRQ.43.4.5
  11. Critical thinking and reasoning
  12. 10.1007/s11422-017-9847-8
  13. 10.1002/sce.20012
  14. 10.1037/a0014702
  15. Argumentasjonsteori, språk og vitenskapsfilosofi
  16. Argumentation analysis: New theory and new applications
  17. 10.1080/00461520.2016.1168741
  18. A practical study of argument
  19. 10.4324/9781315795225
  20. Truth decay: An initial exploration of the diminishing role of facts and analysis in Amer…
  21. 10.1007/s11422-017-9846-9
  22. 10.1002/sce.20395
  23. 10.1177/0956797611402512
  24. 10.1080/23735082.2015.994254
  25. 10.1111/1467-8624.00605
  26. 10.1007/s10648-008-9081-8
  27. 10.1002/tea.20430
  28. 10.1002/sce.21081
  29. Supporting grade 5-8 students in constructing explanations in science: The claim, evidenc…
  30. 10.1207/s1532690xci1402_1
  31. Communication and argument: Elements of applied semantics
  32. Common core state standards: Appendix A. research supporting key elements of the standards
  33. 10.1598/RRQ.46.3.4
  34. 10.1007/s11165-011-9266-x
  35. 10.1007/s11145-018-9848-3
  36. 10.1126/science.1183944
  37. 10.1002/tea.20035
  38. 10.5817/SP2019-4-8
  39. Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2012). A Framework for 21st Century Learning. http://www.p21.org/index.php
  40. The end of education: Redefining the value of school
  41. 10.1080/21645515.2020.1780846
  42. 10.22329/il.v42i1.7222
  43. 10.3102/0034654313487606
  44. Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices
  45. Reznitskaya A., Anderson R. C., McNurlen B., Nguyen-Jahiel K., Archodidou A., Kim S. (2001). Influence of ora…
  46. 10.1080/03057640802701952
  47. 10.5817/SP2019-4-3
  48. 10.1002/sce.20276
  49. Curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class and school-age educare
  50. The uses of argument
  51. 10.3138/9781487574475
  52. Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning
  53. 10.3138/9781442681859
  54. 10.1080/19462166.2013.858183
  55. 10.1017/CBO9780511802034
  56. Research in the Teaching of English
  57. 10.1002/tea.10008