Investigating Instruction for Improving Revision of Argumentative Essays

Jodie A. Butler Northern Illinois University ; M. Anne Britt Northern Illinois University

Abstract

Students are expected to come into the current college classroom already possessing certain skills including the ability to write at the appropriate academic level regardless of discipline and the ability to create well-structured arguments. Research indicates, however, that most students entering college are underprepared in both areas. One strategy that may help students write at a more academic level is teaching students to focus on spending their time on revision. In the current study, we examine two potential sources of difficulty in the revision of argumentative essays: a poorly developed argument schema and a poorly developed global revision task schema. We created and tested the effectiveness of two written tutorials designed to provide college students information to saturate their knowledge base as well as provide them with procedural tasks to complete. We found that without instruction, students focused their revisions on making local wording changes that did not qualitatively improve their essays. An argument tutorial helped students make higher level global changes, include more argument content, and improve the structure of the essay. A global revision tutorial also helped students make more substantive structural changes. Thus, both tutorials helped students improve their revisions, and the tutorials were completed independently by the students successfully.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2011-01-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088310387891
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cites in this index (9)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Research in the Teaching of English
  5. Computers and Composition
Show all 9 →
  1. Research in the Teaching of English
  2. Research in the Teaching of English
  3. Research in the Teaching of English
  4. Research in the Teaching of English
Also cites 35 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01432.x
  2. 10.1016/0749-596X(88)90054-X
  3. 10.1007/BF01464075
  4. 10.2307/748198
  5. 10.1207/S15326950DP3401_4
  6. 10.1007/BF03172827
  7. 10.1037/0022-0663.92.4.694
  8. 10.3102/00346543057004481
  9. 10.2307/357381
  10. 10.1007/978-94-007-1048-1_5
  11. 10.1037/0022-0663.74.4.557
  12. 10.1080/01638539409544891
  13. 10.1177/001872088402600308
  14. 10.1037/0022-0663.87.2.230
  15. 10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445
  16. 10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1106
  17. 10.1348/096317906X120231
  18. 10.1080/01638539409544892
  19. 10.1017/CBO9780511571350
  20. 10.1111/1467-8624.00605
  21. 10.1007/978-94-007-1048-1_8
  22. 10.1207/S15326985EP3501_3
  23. 10.1037/0022-0663.89.4.667
  24. 10.1016/0749-596X(85)90057-9
  25. 10.1007/s11145-007-9067-9
  26. 10.1007/BF00182257
  27. 10.1080/00377990209599887
  28. 10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.157
  29. 10.1037/0022-0663.77.5.562
  30. 10.1007/978-94-007-1048-1_3
  31. 10.2307/356588
  32. Stein, N.L. & Miller, C.A. ( 1993). The development of memory and reasoning skill in argumentative contexts: …
  33. 10.1016/0959-4752(91)90013-X
  34. 10.1037/0022-0663.88.4.682
  35. 10.1080/13546780701527674
CrossRef global citation count: 56 View in citation network →