Patterns of Revision in Online Writing

Written Communication Apr 2008

Patterns of Revision in Online Writing

John Jones

Abstract

This study examines the revision histories of 10 Wikipedia articles nominated for the site's Featured Article Class (FAC), its highest quality rating, 5 of which achieved FAC and 5 of which did not. The revisions to each article were coded, and the coding results were combined with a descriptive analysis of two representative articles in order to determine revision patterns. All articles in both groups showed a higher percentage of additions of new material compared to deletions and revisions that rearranged the text. Although the FAC articles had roughly equal numbers of content and surface revisions, the non-FAC articles had fewer surface revisions and were dominated by content revisions. Although the unique features of the Wikipedia environment inhibit strict comparisons between these results and those of earlier revision studies, these results suggest revision in this environment places unique structural demands on writers, possibly leading to unique revision patterns.

Journal: Written Communication
Published: 2008-04-01
DOI: 10.1177/0741088307312940
Open Access: Closed
Topics: online writing instruction revision

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (9)

Yim et al. (2024)

“I Don’t Feel Like It Is ‘Mine’ at All”: Assessing Wikipedia Editors’ Sense of …

Written Communication
Vetter et al. (2019)

From Opportunities to Outcomes: The Wikipedia-Based Writing Assignment

Computers and Composition
Holcomb et al. (2018)

First-Year Composition as “Big Data”: Towards Examining Student Revisions at Scale

Computers and Composition
Vetter (2018)

Teaching Wikipedia: Appalachian Rhetoric and the Encyclopedic Politics of Repre…

College English
Bridgewater (2017)

History Writing and Wikipedia

Computers and Composition

Show all 9 →

Bilansky (2016)

Using<i>Wikipedia</i>to Teach Audience, Genre, and Collaboration

Pedagogy
Butler et al. (2011)

Investigating Instruction for Improving Revision of Argumentative Essays

Written Communication
Jones (2009)

Book Review: Karaganis, Joe. (Ed.). (2007). Structures of Participation in Digi…

Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Spinuzzi (2009)

Starter Ecologies

Journal of Business and Technical Communication

Cites in this index (5)

Bracewell et al. (2003)

Tasks, Ensembles, and Activity

Written Communication
Wolfe (2002)

Marginal Pedagogy

Written Communication
WIJK et al. (1999)

Identifying Writing Strategies Through Text Analysis

Written Communication
Owston et al. (1992)

The Effects of Word Processing on Students' Writing Quality and Revision Strategies

Research in the Teaching of English
Witte (1983)

Topical Structure and Revision: An Exploratory Study

College Composition and Communication

Also cites 15 works outside this index ↓

10.5210/fm.v11i11.1413

↗
10.2307/356602

↗
10.3102/00346543057004481

↗
10.2307/356630

↗
10.2307/357381

↗
10.1038/438900a

↗
10.1207/s15327051hci0402_3

↗
10.1111/1467-8535.00185

↗
10.1177/001440298805400607

↗
10.1177/002221949602900403

↗
Neuwirth, C.M., Chandhok, R., Charney, D., Wojahn, P. & Kim, L. (1994). Distributed collaborative writing: A …

↗
10.1109/47.272859

↗
10.2307/4486062

↗
10.2307/356588

↗
10.1177/002194369403100103

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 44 View in citation network →