Marginal Pedagogy

Joanna Wolfe University of Louisville Hospital

Abstract

Historically, annotations have provided a means for discussing texts and teaching students about reading practices. This study argues that giving students annotated readings can influence their perceptions of the social context of a writing-from-sources task. Over 120 students read variously annotated letters to the editor, wrote response essays, and answered recall and attitude questionnaires. Evaluative annotations influenced students'perceptions of the text: Passages annotated with positive evaluations were rated as more persuasive than identical passages without annotations; passages annotated with negative evaluations were perceived as less persuasive. Students' global attitudes to the issue were unaffected. Evaluative annotations seemed to decrease student writers' reliance on summary and encourage advanced engagement with source materials. However, some annotations appeared to have negative impacts on essays, causing students to include irrelevant information. Ahypothesis that the perceived position of the annotator shapes students'conceptions of the rhetorical task is advanced and lent limited support.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2002-04-01
DOI
10.1177/074108830201900203
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

  1. Pedagogy
  2. Computers and Composition
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Written Communication

Cites in this index (8)

  1. College Composition and Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Written Communication
  5. Research in the Teaching of English
Show all 8 →
  1. Written Communication
  2. Research in the Teaching of English
  3. Research in the Teaching of English
Also cites 11 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1037/h0030286
  2. 10.3102/00028312026002143
  3. 10.1037/h0033574
  4. 10.1109/47.387775
  5. Reading-to- write: Exploring a cognitive and social process
  6. 10.1037/h0036750
  7. 10.2307/358026
  8. 10.1145/263690.263806
  9. 10.1145/276627.276632
  10. 10.1145/313238.313262
  11. 10.1145/48511.48519
CrossRef global citation count: 17 View in citation network →