The Structure of Argumentative Texts Written by Hebrew Speaking Children in Primary Schools: Relationships Between Writing and Reading Comprehension

Written Communication Oct 2025

The Structure of Argumentative Texts Written by Hebrew Speaking Children in Primary Schools: Relationships Between Writing and Reading Comprehension

Sara Zadunaisky Ehrlich ; Anat Stavans Beit Berl College

Abstract

This experimental study aimed to investigate the relationship between text structure (TS) in argumentations written by Hebrew-speaking primary school children and their reading comprehension (RC) performance. A total of 293 students from second to fifth grade wrote an argumentative text and completed two RC tasks. These tasks consisted of a passage followed by multiple-choice questions targeting different levels of reading comprehension: literal, inferential, evaluative, and gap-filling questions. The students’ scores on the RC tasks were calculated, and their arguments were classified into different levels of complexity based on various structural components. Significant associations were found between text structure and grade level, with the most complex texts produced by students in the highest grade. However, there were fluctuations in the elaboration of text components across different grade levels. Correlations between reading comprehension and text structure were found to be weak and dependent on grade level. Children who scored higher on inferential reading comprehension questions tended to produce texts that were better structured and provided lengthier support for the writer’s claims.

Journal: Written Communication
Published: 2025-10-01
DOI: 10.1177/07410883251349196
Open Access: Closed
Topics: argument

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (4)

Uccelli (2023)

The Language Demands of Analytical Reading and Writing at School

Written Communication
O’Hallaron (2014)

Supporting Fifth-Grade ELLs’ Argumentative Writing Development

Written Communication
Paz et al. (2012)

Adolescents’ Disciplinary Use of Evidence, Argumentative Strategies, and Organi…

Written Communication
Leitão (2003)

Evaluating and Selecting Counterarguments

Written Communication

Also cites 30 works outside this index ↓

10.1037/a0019318

↗
10.1177/1534508408330082

↗
Basaraba D. Yovanoff P. Alonzo J. Tindal G. (2013). Examining the structure of reading comprehension: Do lite…

↗
10.1037/a0019319

↗
10.1007/s11145-005-5600-x

↗
10.2307/1495109

↗
10.1037/a0027182

↗
10.1037/0022-0663.80.2.143

↗
10.1007/s11881-013-0081-0

↗
10.1037/edu0000082

↗
10.3102/0034654315619491

↗
10.1007/978-3-030-38811-9_2

↗
10.1007/s11145-018-9855-4

↗
10.1598/0872075028.46

↗
10.1002/9780470757642.ch12

↗
10.1598/RRQ.45.1.4

↗
Nippold M. A. Ward-Lonergan J. M. Fanning J. L. (2005). Persuasive writing in children adolescents and adults…

↗
10.1007/s11145-006-9029-7

↗
10.1002/9780470757642.ch13

↗
10.1086/518623

↗
10.1037/a0037769

↗
10.1177/1086296X19859515

↗
10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100870

↗
10.1075/wll.5.2.05tol

↗
10.37514/PER-B.2023.1800.2.06

↗
10.1017/CBO9780511840005

↗
10.1007/s11145-018-9875-0

↗
10.1007/s10503-015-9377-z

↗
10.1007/s11145-017-9801-x

↗
10.1016/j.compedu.2013.05.021

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →