Evaluating and Selecting Counterarguments: Studies of Children's Rhetorical Awareness

Selma Leitão Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

Abstract

This article investigates children's evaluation/selection of ideas in writing-related tasks. The critical dimension being considered was to what extent the communicative goal that defines argumentation establishes basic criteria with which children decide whether to include counterargument in a text. Data analysis focused on participants' decisions and, most important, the rationales they present for their decisions. Two constraints seem to drive evaluation/selection processes. First, the content constraint, whereby a writer focuses on agreement with the idea itself; second, the rhetorical constraint, defined as a writer's perception of an idea's value in increasing the acceptability of his or her point of view. Counterargumentation must be perceived as a valuable rhetorical strategy if specific counterarguments are to be incorporated into a text; otherwise, counterargumentation remains part of the process of selection/evaluation without becoming explicit in the product of such a process—the text.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2003-07-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088303257507
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

References (38) · 4 in this index

  1. Alencar, R. M. & Leitão, S. (1998). Produção de idéias e textualização na escrita do texto argumentativo [Con…
  2. Banks-Leite, L. (1996). L'árgumentation chez l'enfant d'âge préscolaire. Paper presented at the Second Confer…
  3. 10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.279
  4. Bronckart, J.P. (1999). Atividade de linguagem, textos e discursos. Por um interacionismo sócio-discursivo [L…
  5. Coirier, P. (1996). Composing argumentative texts: Cognitive and/or textual complexity. In G. Rijlaarsdam, H.…
Show all 38 →
  1. Coirier, P., Andriessen, J. & Chanquoy, L. (1999). From planning to translating: The specificity of argumenta…
  2. Argumentation
  3. Argumentation
  4. Forman, E. A., Larreamendy-Joerns, J., Stein, M. K. & Brown, C. A. (1998). “You're going to want to find out …
  5. Freeman, J. B. (1991). Dialectics and the macrostructure of arguments. Berlin, Germany: Foris.
  6. 10.1007/BF03172821
  7. 10.1080/01638539409544891
  8. Argumentation
  9. Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  10. Leitão, S. (2000a). O manejo de contra-argumentos na escrita argumentativa infantil [The management of counte…
  11. 10.1159/000022695
  12. 10.1590/S0102-79722000000300004
  13. Mehan, H. (1990). Oracular reasoning in psychiatric exam: The resolution of conflict in language. In A. D. Gr…
  14. Perkins, D. N. (1989). Reasoning at it could be: An empirical perspective. In D. M. Top-ping, D. C. Crowell, …
  15. Perkins, D. N., Farady, M. & Bushey, B. (1991). Everyday reasoning and the roots of intelligence. In J. F. Vo…
  16. Pinheiro, R. & Leitão, S. (2000). Consciência da estrutura textual e produção de texto argumentativo. Paper p…
  17. Pouit, D. & Golder, C. (1998). How to find more arguments for writing an argumentative text. Paper presented …
  18. Rego, L. L. B. (1996). Um estudo exploratório dos critérios utilizados pelas crianças para definir histórias …
  19. Santos, C. M. M. & Santos, S. L. (1999). Good argument, content and contextual dimensions. In G. Rijlaarsdam …
  20. Santos, S. L. (1997). O desenvolvimento da escrita argumentativa [The development of argumentative writing]. …
  21. Santos, S. L. (1999). O desenvolvimento da argumentação na escrita …
  22. Simon, H. A (1957). Models of man. New York: Wiley.
  23. Stein, N. L. & Bernas, R. S. (1999). The early emergence of argumentative knowledge and skill. In G. Rijlaars…
  24. Stein, N. L., Bernas, R. S. & Calicchia, D. J. (1996). Conflict talk: Understanding and resolving arguments. …
  25. Stein, N. L. & Miller, C. A. (1991). I win—you lose: The development of argumentative thinking. In J. F. Voss…
  26. Argumentation
  27. Stein, N. L. & Miller, C. A. (1993b). The development of memory and reasoning skill in argumentative contexts…
  28. Toulmin, S. E. (1990). The uses of argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (Originally published…
  29. van Eemeren, F. H. & Grootendorst, R. (1992). Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: A pragma-dialectic…
  30. van Eemeren, F. H. & Grootendorst, R. (1984). Speech acts in argumentative discussions. Dordrecht, Holland: Foris.
  31. van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R. & Kruiger, T. (1987). Handbook of argumentation theory. Dordrecht, Holla…
  32. Voss, J. F., Perkins, D. N. & Segal, J. W. (1991). Preface. In F. Voss, D. N. Perkins & Segal (Eds.), Informa…
  33. Walton, D. N. (1989). Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.