Abstract

This paper investigates the relationship between practical argumentation (PA) and Rhetorical Structure Theory (RST). PA is argumentation providing justification for an agent’s action. PA has been described in terms of a three-level structure composed of practical, evaluative, and classificatory argumentation schemes. RST is a linguistic theory that models the hierarchical structure of monological discourse in terms of discourse coherence relations. RST’s Motivation relation is intended to increase an agent’s inclination to perform some action. Our investigative approach was to analyze argumentation schemes of PA in examples of RST involving Motivation and to analyze RST structure for texts that have been used as examples of PA. The results of the investigation show uses, not only of Motivation, but also RST’s Antithesis, Concession, Evaluation, and Solutionhood. In some cases the RST analysis reflects the layered composition of argumentation schemes of PA.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2025-10-11
DOI
10.1007/s10503-025-09680-1
CompPile
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (26) · 4 in this index

  1. Argumentation
  2. Cabrio, Elena, Sara Tonelli, and Serena Villata. 2013. From discourse analysis to argumentation schemes and b…
  3. Carlson, Lynn. 2001. and Daniel Marcu. Discourse Tagging Reference Manual. ISI Tech Report ISI-TR-545. Univer…
  4. Das, Debopam. 2014. Signalling of Coherence Relations in Discourse. (PhD dissertation), Simon Fraser Universi…
  5. Das, Debopam and Maite Taboada. 2018. Signalling of coherence relations in discourse, beyond discourse marker…
    Discourse Processes  
Show all 26 →
  1. Fahnestock, J. 2011. Rhetorical style: The uses of Language in persuasion. Oxford University Press.
  2. Political discourse analysis
  3. Argumentation
  4. Green, Nancy L. 2023. The use of antithesis and other contrastive relations in argumentation. Argument & Comp…
    Argument & Computation  
  5. Green, Nancy, Rachael Dwight, Kanyamas Navoraphan, and Brian Stadler. 2011. Natural language generation of tr…
    Argument & Computation  
  6. Izutsu, M. N. 2008. Contrast, concessive, and corrective: Toward a comprehensive study of opposition relation…
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  7. Argumentation
  8. Mann, William C., and Sandra A. Thompson. 1987. Rhetorical Structure Theory: A Theory of Text Organization, I…
  9. Mann, William C. and A. Sandra. Thompson. 1988. Rhetorical structure theory: Towards a functional theory of t…
  10. Musi, Elena, Tariq Alhindi, Manfred Stede, Leonard Kriese, Smaranda Muresan, and Andrea Rocci. 2018. A Multi-…
  11. Peldszus, Andreas and Manfrede Stede. 2016. Rhetorical structure and argumentation structure in monologue tex…
  12. Peldszus, Andreas, Saskia Warzecha, and Manfred Stede. 2016. Annotation Guidelines for Argumentation Structur…
  13. Prasad, R., N. Dinesh, A. Lee, E. Miltsakaki, L. Robaldo, A. Joshi, and B. Webber. 2008. The Penn Discourse T…
  14. Stede, Manfred. 2022. Discourse processing. Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technology Lecture #15.
  15. Stede, Manfred, Maite Taboada, and Debopam Das. 2017. Annotation Guidelines for Rhetorical Structure. Univers…
  16. Taboada, Maite, and William C. Mann. 2006. Applications of rhetorical structure theory. Discourse Studies 8(4…
    Discourse Studies  
  17. van Berkel, Kees, H. M. Jean, and Wagemans. 2023. Practical reasoning and practical argumentation: A stakehol…
    Topoi  
  18. Argumentation
  19. Walton, Douglas. 2009. Ethical argumentation. Lexington Books.
  20. Argumentation schemes
  21. Zeldes, Amir, Tatsuya Aoyama, Yang Janet Liu, Siyao Peng, and Debopam Das. 2024. and Luke Gessler. eRST: A Si…