U.S. Secondary Students’ Source-Based Argument Writing in History

Jacob Steiss University of California, Irvine ; Jiali Wang University of California, Irvine ; Young-Suk Grace Kim ; Carol Booth Olson University of California, Irvine

Abstract

Developing students’ source-based argument writing skills is a vital educational goal for the 21st-century information society. Consequently, researchers and educators continually seek ways to understand and improve students’ capacities for advancing arguments and synthesizing multiple documents, texts, or sources in a range of subject areas in secondary schools. This study examined differences between middle and high school students’ argument essays (N = 207) in multiple dimensions of source-based argument writing in history, the dimensions writing in history, and the relations of identified dimensions to overall writing quality. Using multivariate analysis of covariance, middle and high school students’ writing significantly varied in areas of writing related to language use, the presentation of ideas, and evidence use. Their writing varied less so for skills related to historical thinking, indicating a lack of development in these skills across secondary school. Findings from confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling showed a bifactor model with a general factor and 4 specific factors—Presentation of Ideas, Evidence Use, Language Use, and Historical Thinking—best represented writing in this genre, with the general factor strongly predicting holistic writing scores. Implications for both research and educational practice are discussed, including the importance of attending to developmental variation in discrete writing skills.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
10.1177/07410883241263549
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Assessing Writing

References (81) · 10 in this index

  1. Psychological testing
  2. 10.1016/j.lindif.2013.01.007
  3. 10.58680/ej201116413
  4. 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00775.x
  5. Journal of Writing Assessment
Show all 81 →
  1. 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
  2. 10.1207/S1532690XCI2004_2
  3. 10.1177/003172171309400512
  4. California Department of Education. (2024, February 20). California Assessment of Student Performance and Pro…
  5. 10.1080/10888438.2022.2132864
  6. Common Core State Standards Initiative (CCSI). (2012). Implementing the common core state standards. Common C…
  7. 10.1002/rrq.281
  8. 10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.003
  9. Written Communication
  10. 10.1002/rrq.147
  11. Scale development: Theory and applications
  12. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101297
  13. 10.1080/19345747.2017.1300361
  14. 10.1007/BF02295430
  15. What Works Clearinghouse
  16. 10.1080/10824669.2013.773217
  17. 10.1080/00461520.2016.1168741
  18. 10.1080/00461520.2018.1481406
  19. Written Communication
  20. Teaching argument writing, grades 6–12
  21. 10.1080/10705519909540118
  22. 10.1080/07370008.2021.1880410
  23. 10.1037/edu0000407
  24. 10.1037/a0037210
  25. 10.1037/edu0000564
  26. 10.1037/a0013097
  27. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling
  28. Written Communication
  29. Envisioning knowledge: Building literacy in the academic disciplines
  30. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.03.003
  31. 10.1007/s11145-018-9853-6
  32. 10.1037/edu0000805
  33. Handbook of writing research
  34. 10.1598/JAAL.52.2.1
  35. 10.3102/0002831208319733
  36. 10.1080/10508406.2010.481014
  37. 10.1111/j.1467-873X.2011.00547.x
  38. Social Education
  39. 10.1007/s11145-018-9891-0
  40. 10.1177/1086296X12450445
  41. Mplus user’s guide
  42. The Nation’s Report Card: 2014 U.S. history, geography, and civics at grade 8
  43. Social studies for the next generation: Purposes, practices, and implications of the college, career, and civic life (C3) framework for social studies state standards
  44. Common Core State Standards for English language arts and literacy in history/ social stu…
  45. The Analytic Writing Continuum: A comprehensive writing assessment system
  46. 10.1057/978-1-137-52908-4_29
  47. Written Communication
  48. Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory (NREL). (2011). 6+1 Trait® writing. http://educationnorthwest.org/traits
  49. 10.1037/a0037549
  50. Written Communication
  51. The History Teacher
  52. 10.1080/00273171.2012.715555
  53. 10.1080/07370008.2011.634081
  54. 10.1080/00461520.2017.1329015
  55. Advances in applied psycholinguistics: Vol. 2. Reading, writing, and language learning
  56. 10.17763/haer.78.1.v62444321p602101
  57. 10.1097/TLD.0b013e318244557a
  58. 10.17239/L1ESLL-2016.16.01.03
  59. 10.4324/9781410610317
  60. The Big Six Historical Thinking Concepts
  61. Stanford History Education Group. (n.d.). Montgomery Bus Boycott. https://sheg.stanford.edu/history-lessons/m…
  62. Assessing Writing
  63. 10.1080/00377996.2024.2324926
  64. American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting 2022
  65. Written Communication
  66. The Language and Literacy Spectrum
  67. Written Communication
  68. 10.1080/07370008.2012.661813
  69. Journal of Writing Research
  70. 10.1007/s11145-010-9266-7
  71. 10.1086/696097
  72. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199611)10:7<63::AID-ACP438>3.0.CO;2-5
  73. Assessing Writing
  74. 10.1037/0022-0663.83.1.73
  75. Historical thinking and other unnatural acts: Charting the future of teaching the past
  76. Social Education