U.S. Secondary Students’ Source-Based Argument Writing in History

Jacob Steiss University of California, Irvine ; Jiali Wang University of California, Irvine ; Young-Suk Grace Kim ; Carol Booth Olson University of California, Irvine

Abstract

Developing students’ source-based argument writing skills is a vital educational goal for the 21st-century information society. Consequently, researchers and educators continually seek ways to understand and improve students’ capacities for advancing arguments and synthesizing multiple documents, texts, or sources in a range of subject areas in secondary schools. This study examined differences between middle and high school students’ argument essays (N = 207) in multiple dimensions of source-based argument writing in history, the dimensions writing in history, and the relations of identified dimensions to overall writing quality. Using multivariate analysis of covariance, middle and high school students’ writing significantly varied in areas of writing related to language use, the presentation of ideas, and evidence use. Their writing varied less so for skills related to historical thinking, indicating a lack of development in these skills across secondary school. Findings from confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling showed a bifactor model with a general factor and 4 specific factors—Presentation of Ideas, Evidence Use, Language Use, and Historical Thinking—best represented writing in this genre, with the general factor strongly predicting holistic writing scores. Implications for both research and educational practice are discussed, including the importance of attending to developmental variation in discrete writing skills.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
10.1177/07410883241263549
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (7)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Written Communication
  5. Written Communication
Show all 7 →
  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication
Also cites 49 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1016/j.lindif.2013.01.007
  2. 10.58680/ej201116413
  3. 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00775.x
  4. 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
  5. 10.1207/S1532690XCI2004_2
  6. 10.1177/003172171309400512
  7. 10.1080/10888438.2022.2132864
  8. 10.1002/rrq.281
  9. 10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.003
  10. 10.1002/rrq.147
  11. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101297
  12. 10.1080/19345747.2017.1300361
  13. 10.1007/BF02295430
  14. 10.1080/10824669.2013.773217
  15. 10.1080/00461520.2016.1168741
  16. 10.1080/00461520.2018.1481406
  17. 10.1080/10705519909540118
  18. 10.1080/07370008.2021.1880410
  19. 10.1037/edu0000407
  20. 10.1037/a0037210
  21. 10.1037/edu0000564
  22. 10.1037/a0013097
  23. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.03.003
  24. 10.1007/s11145-018-9853-6
  25. 10.1037/edu0000805
  26. 10.1598/JAAL.52.2.1
  27. 10.3102/0002831208319733
  28. 10.1080/10508406.2010.481014
  29. 10.1111/j.1467-873X.2011.00547.x
  30. 10.1007/s11145-018-9891-0
  31. 10.1177/1086296X12450445
  32. 10.1057/978-1-137-52908-4_29
  33. 10.1037/a0037549
  34. 10.1080/00273171.2012.715555
  35. 10.1080/07370008.2011.634081
  36. 10.1080/00461520.2017.1329015
  37. 10.17763/haer.78.1.v62444321p602101
  38. 10.1097/TLD.0b013e318244557a
  39. 10.17239/L1ESLL-2016.16.01.03
  40. 10.4324/9781410610317
  41. 10.1016/j.asw.2021.100600
  42. 10.1080/00377996.2024.2324926
  43. 10.1080/07370008.2012.661813
  44. 10.17239/jowr-2021.13.02.01
  45. 10.1007/s11145-010-9266-7
  46. 10.1086/696097
  47. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199611)10:7<63::AID-ACP438>3.0.CO;2-5
  48. 10.1016/j.asw.2017.08.002
  49. 10.1037/0022-0663.83.1.73
CrossRef global citation count: 7 View in citation network →