Abstract

This article provides three major contributions to the literature: we provide granular information on the development of student argumentative writing across secondary school; we replicate the MacArthur et al. model of Natural Language Processing (NLP) writing features that predict quality with a younger group of students; and we are able to examine the differences for students across language status. In our study, we sought to find the average levels of text length, cohesion, connectives, syntactic complexity, and word-level complexity in this sample across Grades 7-12 by sex, by English learner status, and for essays scoring above and below the median holistic score. Mean levels of variables by grade suggest a developmental progression with respect to text length, with the text length increasing with grade level, but the other variables in the model were fairly stable. Sex did not seem to affect the model in meaningful ways beyond the increased fluency of women writers. We saw text length and word level differences between initially designated and redesignated bilingual students compared to their English-only peers. Finally, we see that the model works better with our higher scoring essays and is less effective explaining the lower scoring essays.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2024-07-01
DOI
10.1177/07410883241242093
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Written Communication

References (63) · 8 in this index

  1. 10.1155/2019/2173638
  2. Journal of Writing Assessment
  3. 10.1177/002221940203500104
  4. 10.1007/s11145-010-9262-y
  5. 10.1017/CBO9781316106372
Show all 63 →
  1. Center for Research on Education Outcomes. (2020). Estimates of learning loss in the 2019-2020 school year. h…
  2. 10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.471
  3. Journal of Writing Research
  4. 10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.006
  5. Written Communication
  6. 10.37514/PER-B.2012.0452.2.05
  7. Dorn E., Hancock B., Sarakatsannis J., Viruleg E. (2020, December 8). COVID-19 and learning loss—disparities …
  8. College Composition and Communication
  9. 10.3758/BF03195564
  10. 10.3102/0091732X18821125
  11. 10.1007/s11145-013-9495-7
  12. Best practices in writing instruction
  13. 10.1207/S1532799Xssr0502_3
  14. 10.17161/foec.v44i4.6687
  15. 10.1086/693009
  16. Writing next-effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high sc…
  17. 10.1080/00405841.2022.2107334
  18. Written Communication
  19. Research in the Teaching of English
  20. 10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100824
  21. 10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0152)
  22. 10.1080/10888438.2010.493964
  23. 10.1037/edu0000564
  24. 10.1007/s11145-015-9542-7
  25. 10.1037/edu0000129
  26. Kogan V., Lavertu S. (2021). How the COVID-19 pandemic affected student learning in Ohio: Analysis of spring …
  27. 10.3102/0013189X20965918
  28. 10.1007/s11145-018-9853-6
  29. 10.1177/0004944116664618
  30. 10.1016/0749-596X(86)90036-7
  31. 10.1007/BF01464076
  32. 10.1037/0022-0663.86.2.256
  33. 10.1515/text.1.1982.2.1-3.113
  34. Written Communication
  35. 10.3758/s13428-012-0258-1
  36. 10.4018/978-1-60960-741-8.ch011
  37. 10.1017/CBO9780511894664
  38. Mplus: Eighth version
  39. National Center for Education Statistics. (n.d.a). NAEP achievement levels. https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreport…
  40. National Center for Education Statistics. (n.d.b). 2017 Writing. https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/writin…
  41. National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). The nation’s report card: Writing 2011 (NCES 2012-470). Ins…
  42. Nesbitt J. (2022). Writing while Black: African American vernacular English (AAVE) and perceived writing perf…
  43. 10.1037/edu0000387
  44. 10.1006/ceps.1998.0995
  45. 10.1007/s40593-016-0122-z
  46. Assessing Writing
  47. Powers D. E. (2005). Wordiness: A selective review of its influence, and suggestions for investigating its re…
  48. Handbook of writing research
  49. 10.1037/amp0000356
  50. 10.4159/harvard.9780674433014
  51. 10.1037/edu0000701
  52. Oh, yeah?!: Putting argument to work both in school and out
  53. Direct measures of writing skill: Issues and applications
  54. 10.1017/S0305000917000423
  55. Assessing Writing
  56. School effectiveness for language minority students
  57. A national study of school effectiveness for language minority students’ long-term academ…
  58. Mind as action