Argumentation Jan 2026 Open Access

Non-verbal Artifacts and Propositionality: Adjusting Speech Act Theory To Accommodate Multimodal Argumentation

Maciej Grzenkowicz University of Groningen

Abstract

Discussions about multimodal argumentation have long been hindered by doubts about whether non-verbal artifacts can express propositions. The opponents of multimodal argumentation have stated that semiotic modes other than language lack the precision required to express verifiable statements about the world. The aim of this article is to demonstrate that the account of propositions presented in speech act theory is suitable for analyzing multimodal communication, which is why multimodal argumentation can be studied in the pragma-dialectical tradition. By connecting Searle’s approach with the pragma-dialectic argumentation schemes, I suggest that the propositional act is constructed of three, and not two, elements: referring expression, predicating quality, and proposition scheme, the latter being a characterization of the relationship between the first two. I derive proposition schemes directly from argumentation schemes, noticing that the pragma-dialectical argumentation schemes actually characterize the relationship within propositions, and not between them. Based on that notion, I argue that when interacting with seemingly ambiguous multimodal artifacts, the receiver automatically chooses the most probable connection between the referring expression and the predicating quality from the list of proposition schemes, explaining why multimodal communication can be easily interpreted intuitively. Finally, I analyze several argumentative examples to illustrate how the proposition schemes can be used in reconstructing the reasoning expressed multimodally.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2026-01-27
DOI
10.1007/s10503-026-09688-1
CompPile
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
discourse analysis argument multimodality
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (47) · 5 in this index

  1. A Abdel-Raheem (2021)
    Abdel-Raheem, A. 2021. Multimodal metaphor and (im)politeness in political cartoons: A sociocognitive approac…
    Journal of Pragmatics  ↗
  2. Asher, N., and A. Lascarides. 2003. Logics of conversation. Cambridge University Press.
  3. Bateman, J. A. 2011. The Decomposability of Semiotic Modes. In K. L. O’Halloran & B. A. Smith (Eds.), Multimo…
     ↗
  4. Bateman, J., J. Wildfeuer, and T. Hiippala. 2017. Multimodality: Foundations, research and Analysis – A Probl…
     ↗
  5. J Bateman (2020)
    Bateman, J., J. Wildfeuer, and T. Hiippala. 2020. Book review: A question of definitions: Foundations for mul…
    Visual Communication  ↗
Show all 47 →
  1. DS Birdsell (1996)
    Birdsell, D. S., and L. Groarke. 1996. Toward a theory of visual argument. Argumentation and Advocacy 33(1):1–10.
    Argumentation and Advocacy
  2. LF Bitzer (1968)
    Bitzer, L. F. 1968. The rhetorical situation. Philosophy & Rhetoric 1(1):1–14.
    Philosophy & Rhetoric
  3. Blair (2015)
    Probative Norms for Multimodal Visual Arguments
    Argumentation
  4. Champagne et al. (2020)
    Why Images Cannot be Arguments, But Moving Ones Might
    Argumentation
  5. Czerwionka, L., S. Dickerson, and R. Aragon-Bautista. 2022. Multimodal and co-constructed speech acts: Gratit…
     ↗
  6. U Eco (1976)
    A theory of semiotics
     ↗
  7. D Fleming (1996)
    Fleming, D. 1996. Can pictures be arguments? Argumentation and Advocacy 33(1):11–22.
    Argumentation and Advocacy
  8. Forceville, C. 2014. Relevance Theory as model for analysing visual and multimodal communication. In D. Machi…
     ↗
  9. Forceville, C. 2020. Visual and multimodal communication: Applying the relevance principle. Oxford University…
     ↗
  10. C Forceville (2014)
    Forceville, C., and B. Clark. 2014. Can pictures have explicatures? Linguadem Em (Dis)Curso 14(3):1–22.
    Linguadem Em (Dis)Curso
  11. C Forceville (2018)
    Forceville, C., and J. E. Kjeldsen. 2018. The affordances and constraints of situation and genre. Internation…
    International Review of Pragmatics  ↗
  12. Grice, H. P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Speech acts (pp. 41–58). BRILL. …
     ↗
  13. L Groarke (1996)
    Groarke, L. 1996. Logic, Art and argument. Informal Logic 18(2–3):105–129.
    Informal Logic
  14. Groarke, L. 2017. Editorial cartoons and ART: Arguing with Pinocchio. In A. Tseronis & C. Forceville (Eds.), …
     ↗
  15. Groarke, L. 2019. Matching schemes of argument: Verbal, visual, multimodal. In B. Barssen, D. Godden, G. R. M…
  16. Groarke, L. (forthcoming)., H. Stöckl, A. Tseronis, and J. Wildfeuer. eds. Arguing with multiple semiotic mod…
  17. L Grundlingh (2018)
    Grundlingh, L. 2018. Memes as speech acts. Social Semiotics 28(2):147–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2…
    Social Semiotics  ↗
  18. Grzenkowicz, M. 2025. Non-verbal Artifacts and Argumentation: Towards a Method of Reconstructing Multimodally…
     ↗
  19. Johnson, R. H. 2003. Why visual arguments aren’t arguments. In J. A. Blair, H. V. Hansen, R. H. Johnson, & C.…
  20. Jucker, A. H. 2024. Speech acts: Discursive, multimodal and diachronic. Cambridge University Press. https://d…
     ↗
  21. G Kišiček (2018)
    Kišiček, G. 2018. Persuasive power of prosodic features. Argumentation and Advocacy 54(4):345–350. https://do…
    Argumentation and Advocacy  ↗
  22. Kjeldsen (2015)
    The Study of Visual and Multimodal Argumentation
    Argumentation
  23. Kjeldsen, J. E. 2015b. Where is Visual Argument? In F. H. Van Eemeren & B. Garssen (Eds.), Reflections on The…
     ↗
  24. JE Kjeldsen (2016)
    Kjeldsen, J. E. 2016. Symbolic condensation and Thick representation in visual and multimodal communication. …
    Argumentation and Advocacy  ↗
  25. Kjeldsen, J. E. 2018. Visual rhetorical argumentation. Semiotica, 2018(220), 69–94. https://doi.org/10.1515/s…
     ↗
  26. Macagno, F., and R. B. W. S. Pinto. 2020. Reconstructing multimodal arguments in advertisements: Combining pr…
     ↗
  27. Mann, W. C., and S. A. Thompson. 1988. Rhetorical structure theory: Toward a functional theory of text organi…
     ↗
  28. O’Halloran, K. L., S. Tan, and M. K. L. E. 2014. Multimodal pragmatics. In K. P. Schneider & A. Barron (Eds.)…
     ↗
  29. Philipp. 2021. Who wants change? Who wants to change? In Know Your Meme. https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/who-w…
  30. Searle, J. 2010. The unity of the proposition. Conceptus 39(96). https://doi.org/10.1515/cpt-2010-9602
     ↗
  31. Searle, J. R. 2018. Are there non-propositional intentional states? In Non-Propositional intentionality, ed. …
     ↗
  32. Searle, J. R. 2011 [1969]. Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press. h…
     ↗
  33. H Stöckl (2024)
    Stöckl, H. 2024. Fresh perspectives on multimodal argument reconstruction. Frontiers in Communication 9:13661…
    Frontiers in Communication  ↗
  34. Tseronis, A. 2017. Analysing multimodal argumentation within the pragma-dialectical framework: Strategic mano…
     ↗
  35. Tseronis, A., and C. Forceville. 2017. The argumentative relevance of visual and multimodal antithesis in Fre…
     ↗
  36. Hoven et al. (2013)
    The Argumentative Reconstruction of Multimodal Discourse, Taking the ABC Covera…
    Argumentation
  37. Van Eemeren, F. H., and B. Garssen. 2019. Argument schemes: Extending the pragma-dialectical approach. In G. …
     ↗
  38. Van Eemeren, F. H., and R. Grootendorst. 2004. A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical a…
     ↗
  39. Laar (2024)
    Multimodal Argument as Dialogue
    Argumentation
  40. JHM Wagemans (2016)
    Wagemans, J. H. M. 2016. Constructing a periodic table of arguments. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org…
    SSRN Electronic Journal  ↗
  41. Walton, D., C. Reed, and F. Macagno. 2008. Argumentation schemes. Cambridge University Press.
     ↗
  42. Wildfeuer, J., and C. Pollaroli. 2017. Seeing the untold: Multimodal argumentation in movie trailers. In A. T…
     ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Research in the Teaching of English May 2025
    Argument as Architecture: Constructing an Alternative K–12 Writing Paradigm for Collective Civic Futures ↗
    Nicole Mirra; Kia Turner; Antero Garcia
    discourse analysis writing pedagogy argument assessment multimodality literacy studies
  2. Philosophy & Rhetoric Dec 2023
    Figures of Entanglement: Diffractive Readings of Barad, New Materialism, and Rhetorical Theory and Criticism ↗
    Savannah Greer Downing
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism discourse analysis decolonial rhetorics argument multimodality race and writing gender and writing book reviews editorial matter
  3. Pedagogy Apr 2023
    A Mighty Cooperative ↗
    Jennifer Horwitz
    discourse analysis decolonial rhetorics writing pedagogy teacher development argument qualitative research digital rhetoric multimodality online writing instruction race and writing disability studies place and space editorial matter
  4. Rhetoric & Public Affairs Sep 2022
    Heritage and Hate: Old South Rhetoric at Southern Universities ↗
    Eryn Johnson; Jesse Crombie
    rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument labor and working conditions archival research multimodality race and writing disability studies
  5. Rhetoric & Public Affairs Mar 2022
    Andrew Jackson: A Rhetorical Portrayal of Presidential Leadership ↗
    Jacob Justice
    rhetorical criticism genre theory discourse analysis revision argument multimodality race and writing public rhetoric editorial matter