Abstract

Discussions about multimodal argumentation have long been hindered by doubts about whether non-verbal artifacts can express propositions. The opponents of multimodal argumentation have stated that semiotic modes other than language lack the precision required to express verifiable statements about the world. The aim of this article is to demonstrate that the account of propositions presented in speech act theory is suitable for analyzing multimodal communication, which is why multimodal argumentation can be studied in the pragma-dialectical tradition. By connecting Searle’s approach with the pragma-dialectic argumentation schemes, I suggest that the propositional act is constructed of three, and not two, elements: referring expression, predicating quality, and proposition scheme, the latter being a characterization of the relationship between the first two. I derive proposition schemes directly from argumentation schemes, noticing that the pragma-dialectical argumentation schemes actually characterize the relationship within propositions, and not between them. Based on that notion, I argue that when interacting with seemingly ambiguous multimodal artifacts, the receiver automatically chooses the most probable connection between the referring expression and the predicating quality from the list of proposition schemes, explaining why multimodal communication can be easily interpreted intuitively. Finally, I analyze several argumentative examples to illustrate how the proposition schemes can be used in reconstructing the reasoning expressed multimodally.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2026-01-27
DOI
10.1007/s10503-026-09688-1
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (5)

  1. Argumentation
  2. Argumentation
  3. Argumentation
  4. Argumentation
  5. Argumentation
Also cites 32 works outside this index ↓
  1. Abdel-Raheem, A. 2021. Multimodal metaphor and (im)politeness in political cartoons: A sociocognitive approac…
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  2. Bateman, J. A. 2011. The Decomposability of Semiotic Modes. In K. L. O’Halloran & B. A. Smith (Eds.), Multimo…
  3. Bateman, J., J. Wildfeuer, and T. Hiippala. 2017. Multimodality: Foundations, research and Analysis – A Probl…
  4. Bateman, J., J. Wildfeuer, and T. Hiippala. 2020. Book review: A question of definitions: Foundations for mul…
    Visual Communication  
  5. Czerwionka, L., S. Dickerson, and R. Aragon-Bautista. 2022. Multimodal and co-constructed speech acts: Gratit…
  6. A theory of semiotics
  7. Forceville, C. 2014. Relevance Theory as model for analysing visual and multimodal communication. In D. Machi…
  8. Forceville, C. 2020. Visual and multimodal communication: Applying the relevance principle. Oxford University…
  9. Forceville, C., and J. E. Kjeldsen. 2018. The affordances and constraints of situation and genre. Internation…
    International Review of Pragmatics  
  10. Grice, H. P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Speech acts (pp. 41–58). BRILL. …
  11. Groarke, L. 2017. Editorial cartoons and ART: Arguing with Pinocchio. In A. Tseronis & C. Forceville (Eds.), …
  12. Grundlingh, L. 2018. Memes as speech acts. Social Semiotics 28(2):147–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2…
    Social Semiotics  
  13. Grzenkowicz, M. 2025. Non-verbal Artifacts and Argumentation: Towards a Method of Reconstructing Multimodally…
  14. Jucker, A. H. 2024. Speech acts: Discursive, multimodal and diachronic. Cambridge University Press. https://d…
  15. Kišiček, G. 2018. Persuasive power of prosodic features. Argumentation and Advocacy 54(4):345–350. https://do…
    Argumentation and Advocacy  
  16. Kjeldsen, J. E. 2015b. Where is Visual Argument? In F. H. Van Eemeren & B. Garssen (Eds.), Reflections on The…
  17. Kjeldsen, J. E. 2016. Symbolic condensation and Thick representation in visual and multimodal communication. …
    Argumentation and Advocacy  
  18. Kjeldsen, J. E. 2018. Visual rhetorical argumentation. Semiotica, 2018(220), 69–94. https://doi.org/10.1515/s…
  19. Macagno, F., and R. B. W. S. Pinto. 2020. Reconstructing multimodal arguments in advertisements: Combining pr…
  20. Mann, W. C., and S. A. Thompson. 1988. Rhetorical structure theory: Toward a functional theory of text organi…
  21. O’Halloran, K. L., S. Tan, and M. K. L. E. 2014. Multimodal pragmatics. In K. P. Schneider & A. Barron (Eds.)…
  22. Searle, J. 2010. The unity of the proposition. Conceptus 39(96). https://doi.org/10.1515/cpt-2010-9602
  23. Searle, J. R. 2018. Are there non-propositional intentional states? In Non-Propositional intentionality, ed. …
  24. Searle, J. R. 2011 [1969]. Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press. h…
  25. Stöckl, H. 2024. Fresh perspectives on multimodal argument reconstruction. Frontiers in Communication 9:13661…
    Frontiers in Communication  
  26. Tseronis, A. 2017. Analysing multimodal argumentation within the pragma-dialectical framework: Strategic mano…
  27. Tseronis, A., and C. Forceville. 2017. The argumentative relevance of visual and multimodal antithesis in Fre…
  28. Van Eemeren, F. H., and B. Garssen. 2019. Argument schemes: Extending the pragma-dialectical approach. In G. …
  29. Van Eemeren, F. H., and R. Grootendorst. 2004. A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical a…
  30. Wagemans, J. H. M. 2016. Constructing a periodic table of arguments. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org…
    SSRN Electronic Journal  
  31. Walton, D., C. Reed, and F. Macagno. 2008. Argumentation schemes. Cambridge University Press.
  32. Wildfeuer, J., and C. Pollaroli. 2017. Seeing the untold: Multimodal argumentation in movie trailers. In A. T…