“No Facts Equals Unconvincing”: Fact and Opinion as Conceptual Tools in High School Students’ Written Arguments

Written Communication Jul 2018

“No Facts Equals Unconvincing”: Fact and Opinion as Conceptual Tools in High School Students’ Written Arguments

Jon-Philip Imbrenda University of Pittsburgh

Abstract

In this study, I present a qualitative analysis of 11 writing portfolios drawn from a yearlong instructional program designed to apprentice students into the practices of argumentative writing typical of early-college coursework in the United States. The students’ formal and informal writings were parsed into utterances and coded along two developmental dimensions: reciprocity, or the extent to which each utterance answered to the immediate context in which it was generated; and indexicality, or the extent to which each utterance evidenced modes of reasoning that reflect the conventions of academic argumentation. My analysis found that although students’ writing evidenced a high degree of reciprocity, they frequently employed nonacademic modes of reasoning. Focusing on a subset of utterances, I show how their tacit orientations toward the concepts of fact and opinion limited the extent to which their reasoning satisfied the evidentiary expectations of formal academic discourse. This discovery suggests that students’ development as writers of academic arguments is closely linked to their formal instruction in argumentative writing as well as to their tacit understandings of concepts fundamental to argumentation. Moreover, these findings highlight important distinctions between formal and informal reasoning and how those distinctions may be implicated in both curriculum and instruction.

Journal: Written Communication
Published: 2018-07-01
DOI: 10.1177/0741088318768560
Open Access: Closed
Topics: curriculum design multimodality multilingual writers argument

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

Fleming (2019)

Fear of Persuasion in the English Language Arts

College English
Hesse (2019)

Journals in Composition Studies, Thirty-Five Years After

College English

Cites in this index (11)

Olsen et al. (2018)

Examining Intertextual Connections in Written Arguments: A Study of Student Wri…

Written Communication
Imbrenda (2016)

The Blackbird Whistling or Just After? Vygotsky’s Tool and Sign as an Analytic …

Written Communication
Kuhn et al. (2016)

Tracing the Development of Argumentive Writing in a Discourse-Rich Context

Written Communication
DeStigter (2015)

On the Ascendance of Argument: A Critique of the Assumptions of Academe’s Domin…

Research in the Teaching of English
Felton et al. (2015)

Arguing to Agree

Written Communication

Show all 11 →

VanDerHeide et al. (2013)

Instructional Chains as a Method for Examining the Teaching and Learning of Arg…

Written Communication
Wolfe (2012)

Individual Differences in the “Myside Bias” in Reasoning and Written Argumentation

Written Communication
Wolfe (2011)

Argumentation Across the Curriculum

Written Communication
Wilder et al. (2009)

Sharing the Tacit Rhetorical Knowledge of the Literary Scholar: The Effects of …

Research in the Teaching of English
Wolfe et al. (2009)

Argumentation Schema and the Myside Bias in Written Argumentation

Written Communication
HAAS (1994)

Learning to Read Biology

Written Communication

Also cites 12 works outside this index ↓

10.7208/chicago/9780226161822.001.0001

↗
Bakhtin M. M. (1986)

Speech genres and other late essays

↗
10.1080/10749039.2012.688231

↗
10.1002/tea.21076

↗
10.1080/01638531003653344

↗
10.1017/CBO9780511815355

↗
10.17239/jowr-2014.06.02.3

↗
10.1598/RRQ.46.3.4

↗
Nystrand M. (1986)

The structure of written communication: Studies in reciprocity between writers and readers

↗
Smith M. W. (2018)

Developing writers of argument: Tools and rules that sharpen students’ reasoning

↗
10.1080/09500782.2017.1326504

↗
10.1080/13546780701527674

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 2 View in citation network →