Are Two Voices Better Than One? Comparing Aspects of Text Quality and Authorial Voice in Paired and Independent L2 Writing

Written Communication Oct 2020

Are Two Voices Better Than One? Comparing Aspects of Text Quality and Authorial Voice in Paired and Independent L2 Writing

Reza Zabihi University of Neyshabur ; Maryam Bayan University of Neyshabur

Abstract

Research has shown that collaboratively produced texts are better in quality compared with individually written texts. However, no study has considered the role of collaboration in authorial voice, which is an essential element in current writing curricula. This study analyzes the effects of collaborative task performance in the quality of L2 learners’ argumentative texts and in their authorial voice strength. A total of 306 upper-intermediate L2 learners were selected and divided into independent ( N = 130) and paired ( N = 176) groups. Each learner/pair was asked to write one argumentative text. The quality of writings was determined by a quantitative analysis that included three measures of complexity, accuracy, and fluency (CAF). Participants’ authorial voice strength was assessed by two raters using an analytic voice rubric. Comparison of means revealed that pairs outperformed independent writers in all CAF measures. However, the results for the role of collaboration in authorial voice were mixed: While pairs were more successful than independent writers in manifesting their ideational voice, independent writers outperformed pairs with regard to affective and presence voice dimensions and holistic voice scores. The article concludes that, despite its positive implications for L2 writing, collaborative writing may pose challenges for learners’ authorial stance taking.

Journal: Written Communication
Published: 2020-10-01
DOI: 10.1177/0741088320939542
Open Access: Closed
Topics: assessment multilingual writers voice and style affect and writing

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

Wang et al. (2025)

Getting to “the Upper End of the Novice Zone”: An Exploration of Doctoral Stude…

Written Communication

Cites in this index (5)

Zabihi (2018)

The Role of Cognitive and Affective Factors in Measures of L2 Writing

Written Communication
Kuhn et al. (2016)

Tracing the Development of Argumentive Writing in a Discourse-Rich Context

Written Communication
Wolfe (2011)

Argumentation Across the Curriculum

Written Communication
Hyland (2010)

Community and Individuality: Performing Identity in Applied Linguistics

Written Communication
Elbow (2007)

Reconsiderations: Voice in Writing Again: Embracing Contraries

College English

Also cites 40 works outside this index ↓

10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00035-2

↗
10.1016/S0021-9924(03)00019-4

↗
Cappello M. (2006)

10.58680/la20064909

Language Arts ↗
10.1007/s10734-011-9428-9

↗
10.1016/j.asw.2011.01.003

↗
10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80120-9

↗
10.1075/lllt.11

↗
10.1016/j.jslw.2011.12.002

↗
10.1017/S0272263100015047

↗
10.1007/BF02903072

↗
10.1016/j.jslw.2003.08.001

↗
10.1016/S1060-3743(03)00015-8

↗
10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00038-2

↗
10.2307/30046464

↗
10.1016/j.asw.2008.12.002

↗
10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.405

↗
10.1016/j.paid.2009.03.016

↗
10.1080/09588220903467335

↗
10.1017/CBO9781139524551.014

↗
10.1093/applin/amp043

↗
10.1016/j.asw.2011.07.001

↗
10.1016/B978-012589042-7/50015-3

↗
10.1057/9781137030825_10

↗
10.1016/j.system.2004.01.003

↗
10.1177/1362168810375364

↗
10.1093/applin/amp044

↗
10.4324/9781410604712

↗
10.15702/mall.2011.14.1.121

↗
10.1016/S1060-3743(96)90013-2

↗
10.1598/RRQ.46.1.4

↗
10.1016/S1060-3743(02)00070-X

↗
10.1016/j.jslw.2005.05.002

↗
10.1017/S0267190511000079

↗
10.21832/9781847699954

↗
Vinken H. (2004)

Comparing cultures: Dimensions of culture in a comparative perspective

↗
10.1177/0265532209104670

↗
10.17239/jowr-2019.11.02.04

↗
10.1177/0265532212456965

↗
10.1016/j.asw.2016.08.004

↗
10.1016/j.asw.2008.10.003

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 13 View in citation network →