The Role of Cognitive and Affective Factors in Measures of L2 Writing

Reza Zabihi University of Neyshabur

Abstract

This study investigates the direct and/or indirect effects of some cognitive (working memory capacity) and affective (writing anxiety and writing self-efficacy) variables on the complexity, accuracy, and fluency (CAF) of second language (L2) learners’ writings. To achieve this goal, 232 upper-intermediate English learners performed an automated version of a working memory capacity task (A-OSPAN) and a timed narrative writing task in L2. Furthermore, participants were asked to complete two self-report questionnaires. The proposed path model adequately fitted the data, and results of path analyses indicated the following: All three measures of L2 writing were directly predicted by learners’ writing self-efficacy; writing self-efficacy affected CAF indirectly through writing anxiety; the direct paths from writing anxiety to all measures of L2 writing were negatively significant; higher working memory spans directly predicted higher L2 writing scores regarding complexity and fluency, but negatively affected learners’ accuracy scores. Based on these findings, the author discusses techniques for enhancing learners’ writing self-efficacy, reducing their anxiety, and helping them make efficient use of working memory resources.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2018-01-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088317735836
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Written Communication

Cites in this index (3)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Research in the Teaching of English
  3. Research in the Teaching of English
Also cites 49 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1002/tesq.8
  2. 10.1016/j.system.2009.09.007
  3. 10.1038/nrn1201
  4. 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60452-1
  5. 10.1037/a0029692
  6. 10.15858/engtea.68.4.201312.43
  7. 10.1016/j.jslw.2004.07.001
  8. 10.1111/0023-8333.00095
  9. 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
  10. 10.1080/00220671.1978.10885110
  11. 10.1075/lllt.11
  12. 10.1037/0096-3445.128.3.309
  13. 10.1080/00220671.1981.10885348
  14. 10.1017/S0272263100015047
  15. 10.1017/S0272263100010457
  16. 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01174.x
  17. 10.1017/S0267190501000071
  18. 10.1075/lllt.32
  19. 10.1080/10705519909540118
  20. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.11.001
  21. 10.3758/BF03195739
  22. 10.1023/A:1014626805572
  23. 10.1017/CBO9781139524551.014
  24. 10.1093/applin/amp043
  25. 10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00306.x
  26. 10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
  27. 10.1075/lllt.2.12mac
  28. 10.1007/BF01464076
  29. 10.1207/S15326985EP3501_3
  30. 10.1016/j.jml.2006.06.006
  31. 10.2307/357635
  32. 10.1093/applin/amp044
  33. 10.1017/S0142716406060322
  34. 10.1027/1016-9040.9.1.32
  35. 10.1080/10573560308222
  36. 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6807(199604)33:2<163::AID-PITS10>3.0.CO;2-C
  37. 10.1080/00220671.1997.10544593
  38. 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1992.tb02573.x
  39. 10.1080/01443410.2011.621411
  40. 10.1080/2331186X.2016.1179164
  41. 10.1007/978-1-4419-6868-5_10
  42. 10.1080/10573560308219
  43. 10.1177/136216889700100302
  44. 10.1111/1467-9922.00071
  45. 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00444.x
  46. 10.3758/BF03192720
  47. 10.1057/9780230523470_7
  48. 10.1111/j.1944-9720.1986.tb01032.x
  49. 10.1016/S0959-4752(99)00019-5
CrossRef global citation count: 85 View in citation network →