Abstract

This article explores the usefulness of identifying the stasis of an argument, that is, whether it concerns an issue of fact, definition, cause, value, or action. The stasis of an argument can be seen as a component that has to be justified. An author must either assume or overtly appeal to the value of addressing a particular audience on a topic in a particular stasis. Once this principle of rhetorical analysis is in place, it is especially useful as an approach in the current enterprise of analyzing the rhetoric of the disciplines. While arguments in public forums naturally exploit the full stases, arguments in disciplinary contexts usually concern only the first two. “Exemplary” arguments in representative issues of Science and PMLA are then analyzed for their stasis and how they justify arguing over the issues they address. While science articles open and reopen questions of fact, classification, and cause while assuming the value of their enterprise, articles in literary criticism are problematic. They concern issues of value that are to a great extent already granted by their audience.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
1988-10-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088388005004002
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (33)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Written Communication
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Written Communication
  5. Rhetoric Review
Show all 33 →
  1. Written Communication
  2. Argumentation
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  5. Written Communication
  6. Technical Communication Quarterly
  7. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  8. Rhetoric Review
  9. Rhetoric Review
  10. Written Communication
  11. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  12. Written Communication
  13. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  14. Written Communication
  15. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  16. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  17. Written Communication
  18. Rhetoric Review
  19. Written Communication
  20. Pedagogy
  21. Written Communication
  22. Technical Communication Quarterly
  23. Rhetoric Review
  24. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  25. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  26. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  27. Rhetoric Review
  28. Written Communication

References (25) · 1 in this index

  1. 10.1126/science.3457472
  2. 10.1126/science.232.4751.775
  3. De inventione; de optimo genere oratorum; topica
  4. 10.1080/03637755009375016
  5. Written Communication
Show all 25 →
  1. Penn State Conference on Rhetoric and Composition
  2. Argument in transition
  3. Oldspeak/newspeak: Rhetorical transformations
  4. Dimensions of argument
  5. Dimensions of argument
  6. 10.1126/science.3008338
  7. 10.2307/462534
  8. 10.1126/science.232.4751.746
  9. 10.1126/science.3961503
  10. 10.1080/03637756409375419
  11. 10.1126/science.232.4751.749
  12. The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation
  13. Institution oratoria
  14. 10.1126/science.2421411
  15. 10.2307/462533
  16. 10.1126/science.3008339
  17. 10.2307/462532
  18. 10.1080/00335637209383109
  19. The uses of argument
  20. 10.1126/science.2938259