In Praise of Carbon, In Praise of Science

Abstract

This article explores the nature of epideictic rhetoric in science through a close textual analysis of three Nobel lectures. It examines the effects of the genre shift from original research reports to ceremonial speeches, revealing significant differences from Fahnestock's analysis of the genre shift from forensic research reports to epideictic articles in the popular press, especially a move toward greater candidness about the research process. Epideictic scientific rhetoric, therefore, can be said to celebrate the scientific method in general as much as it does the particular line of research at hand.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
2007-07-01
DOI
10.1177/1050651907300468
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Rhetoric Review

Cites in this index (4)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Written Communication
Also cites 12 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1084/jem.79.2.137
  2. Heath, J.R., O'Brien, S.C., Zhang, Q., Liu, Y., Curl, R.F., Kroto, H.W., et al. (1985). Lanthanum complexes o…
  3. 10.1038/347354a0
  4. 10.1038/329529a0
  5. 10.1038/318162a0
  6. 10.1016/S0009-2614(86)80042-2
  7. 10.2307/375964
  8. 10.1080/00335638409383686
  9. 10.1177/016224399401900302
  10. 10.1038/171737a0
  11. 10.1021/ja00221a085
  12. 10.1021/j100276a001
CrossRef global citation count: 5 View in citation network →